Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Psychometric evaluation of a Turkish version of the modified Hemodialysis Fear of Injecting Questionnaire for patients undergoing hemodialysis: a methodological study Cover

Psychometric evaluation of a Turkish version of the modified Hemodialysis Fear of Injecting Questionnaire for patients undergoing hemodialysis: a methodological study

By:   
Open Access
|Sep 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Item content of the FSI subscale of the D-FISQ and the HD-FIQ.

Item No.Snoek et al. (original English version of the FSI). (When I have to inject myself)Mollema et al. (abbreviated English version of the FSI). (When I have to inject myself)Celik and Pinar (Turkish version of the FSI). (When I have to inject myself)In the present study (HD-FIQ). (When a needle must be inserted into a vascular access for HD)
1I feel afraid.I become restless.I become restless.I feel tense.
2I start to sweat.I feel tense.I feel tense.I feel afraid.
3I become restless.I feel afraid.I feel afraid.I feel nervous.
4I try to avoid it.I worry about it.I worry about it.I brood about it.
5I feel tense.I feel nervous.I feel nervous.
6I get a stomachache.I brood about it.I brood about it.
7I panic.
8I worry about it.
9My heart starts pounding.
10I feel nervous.
11I start trembling.
12I feel anxious.
13I have trouble breathing.
14I try to postpone it.
15I get angry.

[i] Note: D-FISQ, Diabetes Fear of Injecting and Self-Testing Questionnaire; FSI, Fear of Self-Injecting; HD, Hemodialysis; HD-FIQ, Hemodialysis Fear of Injecting Questionnaire.

Figure 1.

STROBE flow diagram of the study design.

Note: STROBE: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology.

Table 2.

Descriptions of participant characteristics and comparison of the HD-FIQ scores by participant characteristics (N = 100).

Variablesn (%)HD-FIQ
M (SD)z†P-value
Gender
  Female38 (38.0)5.95 (3.01)–0.060.951
  Male62 (62.0)6.26 (3.32)
Marital status
  Married58 (58.0)6.41 (3.50)–0.680.495
  Unmarried42 (42.0)5.76 (2.74)
Education level
  Literate/primary school (5 years)39 (39.0)6.44 (3.23)–1.080.281
  Secondary school or greater (≥6 years)61 (61.0)5.95 (3.20)
Employment status
  Working20 (20.0)5.65 (2.56)–0.680.498
  Not working80 (80.0)6.26 (3.34)
Income level
  Adequate20 (20.0)5.35 (2.25)2.160.339
  Moderate45 (45.0)6.16 (3.42)
  Inadequate35 (35.0)6.57 (3.35)
Comorbidity
  Yes76 (76.0)6.07 (2.90)−0.380.703
  No24 (24.0)6.38 (4.06)
Dialysis frequency
  Twice weekly8 (8.0)7.00 (3.16)–1.050.294
  3 times weekly92 (92.0)6.07 (3.21)
Residual urine output
  Yes12 (12.0)6.08 (3.03)–0.140.886
  No88 (88.0)6.15 (3.24)
Vascular access
  AVF87 (87.0)6.39 (3.30)–2.730.006
  Catheter13 (13.0)4.46 (1.66)
Injection fear
  Yes48 (48.0)8.46 (3.32)–9.15<0.001
  No52 (52.0)4.00 (0.01)
Intensity of injection fear (n = 48)
  No52 (52.0)4.00 (0.01)89.23<0.001
  Mild31 (31.06.97 (1.96)
  Medium11 (11.0)9.18 (2.09)
  High6 (6.0)14.83 (2.86)
Intensity of anxiety
  Medium32 (32.0)6.06 (4.47)–2.700.007
  High68 (68.0)6.18 (2.43)

Note: AVF, arteriovenous fistula; HD-FIQ, Hemodialysis Fear of Injecting Questionnaire; M, mean; SD, standard deviation;

† Group differences were measured by the Mann–Whitney U test, except for income level and intensity of injection fear (Kruskal–Wallis test, χ2).

Table 3.

Means, SDs, ranges, medians, and comparison of the HD-FIQ scores by various parameters (n = 100).

VariablesM (SD)RangeMedianHD-FIQ
r†P
Age (years)62.99 (16.34)21–9663.000.140.157
Dialysis vintage (months)88.61 (85.03)1–39660.00–0.40<0.001
Intensity of injection fear (VAS)2.62 (2.19)1–91.000.96<0.001
STAI-S61.87 (6.50)50–7563.000.330.001

Note: HD-FIQ, Hemodialysis Fear of Injecting Questionnaire; M, mean; SDs, standard deviations; STAI-S, State Scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; VAS, visual analog scale;

† Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to calculate P-values.

Table 4.

Item means, SDs, CITC, CAID, component loading, and inter-item correlation matrix of the HD-FIQ (n = 100).

Item NoM (SD)CITCCAIDaComponent loading†Item 1 r*Item 2 r*Item 3 r*
11.57 (0.86)0.880.890.94–
21.69 (0.88)0.870.890.930.80–
31.44 (0.83)0.870.890.930.710.72–
41.50 (0.88)0.830.900.910.700.670.75

Note: CAID, Cronbach’s alpha if item deleted; CITC, corrected item-total correlation; HD-FIQ, Hemodialysis Fear of Injecting Questionnaire; M, mean; SDs, standard deviations;

a Cronbach’s alpha: 0.89;

† Component loadings were computed using principal components analysis;

* Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to calculateP-values (P < 0.001; 2-tailed).

Table 5.

Comparison of the HD-FIQ test-retest scores and correlation (n = 30).

ItemFirst interview M (SD)Second interview M (SD)taP-valueICC (95% CI)
HD-FIQ7.43 (4.56)7.50 (4.44)–0.5280.6010.94 (0.92–0.98)*

Note: CI, confidence interval; HD-FIQ, Hemodialysis Fear of Injecting Questionnaire; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient, average measure; M, mean; SD, standard deviation;

a Paired-samples t-test was used to calculate the P-value;

* P < 0.001 (2-tailed).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2026-0038 | Journal eISSN: 2544-8994 | Journal ISSN: 2097-5368
Language: English
Page range: 345 - 355
Submitted on: Sep 22, 2025
Accepted on: Nov 6, 2025
Published on: Sep 25, 2026
Published by: Shanxi Medical Periodical Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Belgüzar Kara, published by Shanxi Medical Periodical Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.