References
- Akindele, T.S., Afolabi, A.Y., Pitan, O.O. and Gidado, O.T., 2016. The Threads of Organizational Theory: A Phenomenological Analysis. 6 (5):158-184, https://doi.org/10.5923/j.mm.20160605.03.
- Rathaus, C., 2023. Public Sector Reform and Merit: Principles, Practices, and pushback, In Goldfinch, F. S. (ed.), Handbook of Public Administration Reform, pp.27-40, Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Aristovnik, A., Murko, E. and Ravšelj, D., 2022. From Neo-Weberian to Hybrid Governance Models in Public Administration: Differences between State and Local Self-Government Administrative Sciences 12 (1): 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010026.
- Bauer, M.W. and Trondal, J., 2015. The Administrative System of the European Union In: Bauer, M.W., Trondal, J. (eds). The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System. European administrative governance, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp.1-31. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137339898_1.
- Bouckaert, G., 2022. From NPM to NWS in Europe. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, Special Issue, pp.22-31.
- Bouckaert, G., 2023. The neo-Weberian state: From ideal type model to reality? Max Weber Studies 23(1), 13-59. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/max.2023.0002.
- Chave, D. and Richard, G., 1982. Neo Taylorism or worker autonomy? Reflections on Three Experiments in Work Organization International Journal of Sociology, 12 (4):77-89, https://doi.org/10.1080/15579336.1982.11769809.
- Cozza, A., 2024. Understanding Organizational Culture Innovation, Transparency, Leadership, Community, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
- Crowley, M., Tope, D., Chamberlain, L.J. and Hodson, R., 2010. Neo-Taylorism at Work: Occupational Change in the Post-Fordist Era. Social Problems, 57 3 (1):421-447, https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2010.57.3.421.
- Çiner, C.U. and Olgun, B., 2015. The Neo-Weberian state: A new debate for New Public Management reforms. In Ö. Köseoğlu and Z.M. Sobaci (Eds.), The search for paradigms in public administration, pp.205-230, Dora Publishing.
- DeVries, J., 2013. Public Sector Reform: An Overview of Recent Literature and Research on NPM and Alternative Paths International Journal of Public Sector Administration, 26 (1):4-16.
- Demirel, E., Alp, M., Taşdemir, M. and Torlak, S., 2018. An examination of the effects of digital Taylorism on labor, production, and the economy. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 5(18), pp.430-438.
- Dunn, W.N. and Miller, D.Y., 2007. A Critique of the New Public Administration and the Neo-Weberian State: Advancing a Critical Theory of Administrative Reform Public Organization Review, 7:345-358. doi.org/10.1007/s11115-007-0042-3.
- Durant, F.R., 2000. Whither the Neoadministrative State? Toward a Policy-Centered Theory of Administrative Reform, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10 (1):79-109, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024268.
- Drechsler, W., 2009. The Rise and Demise of the New Public Administration: Lessons and Opportunities for South East Europe, Central European Public Administration Review, 7 (3):7-27.
- Dreschsler, W. and Kattel, R., 2008/2009. Toward the Neo-Weberian State?: Perhaps, but Certainly Adieu, NPM. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2): 95-101.
- Freemantle, N., 1995. Taylorism in a post modern age? HealthServManageRes. 8 (1):3-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/095148489500800101.
- Estragó, A., 2023. Administration in worker cooperatives: Democracy vs. dissonance, and possible overcoming approaches, Journal of Cooperative Organization and Administration, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2023.100216.
- Gualmini, E., 2008. Restructuring Weberian bureaucracy: Comparing managerial reforms in Europe and the United States Public Administration, 86(1):75-94.
- Hood, C. and Dixon, R., 2013. What we have to show for 30 years of new public administration: Higher costs, more complaints, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 28(3): 265-267.
- Hughes, O.E., 2003. Public Administration and Administration: An Introduction, 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.
- Ivanova, M. and von Scheve, C., 2020. Power through empowerment? The managerial discourse on employee empowerment. Organization, 27 (6):777-796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419855709.
- Kettl, F.D., 2022. Public administration and political science: Can this marriage be saved? Governance, 35 (4):983-990, https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12724.
- Kovač, P. and Jukić, T., 2016. Development of Public Administration and its Research in Slovenia through the Lenses of Content Analysis of the International Public Administration Review International Public Administration Review, 14(1):75-114.
- Liiv, R.T., 2008/2009. New Public Administration versus neo-weberian state in central and Eastern Europe. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1 (2):69-83.
- Lomba, C., 2005. Beyond the debate over Post vs Neo-Taylorism, International Sociology, 20 (1):71-91.
- Lottholz, P. and Hébert, L.N., 2016. Re-reading Weber, Re-Conceptualizing State-Building: From Neo-Weberian to Post-Weberian Approaches to State, Legitimacy, State Building. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2016.1230588.
- Lynn, L.E., 2003. Public Administration in the Twenty-First Century. Review of the Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for the Twenty-First Century America; the Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance, Public Administration Review, 63 (5):631-635.
- Lynn, L.E., 2008/2009. What is a Neo-Weberian State? Reflections on a concept and its Implications. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1 (2):17-31.
- Niepce, W. and Molleman, E., 1998. Work Design Issues in Lean Production from a Sociotechnical Systems Perspective: Neo-Taylorism or the Next Step in Sociotechnical Design? Human Relations 51, 259-287. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016992403973
- Olsen, J.P., 2005. Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16 (1):1-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui027.
- Ongaro, E., 2024. Integrating the neo-Weberian state and public value. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90 (4): 830-844. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523241228830.
- Özer, M.A., 2022. Bureaucracy lessons. Gazi Publishing.
- Özer, M.A., 2017. Where is New Public Management heading? Projections for Turkey. Journal of Turkish Administration, 90(486), pp.259-294.
- Page, S., 2005. What’s new about the new public administration? Administrative change in the human services. Public Administration Review 65 (6):713-727.
- Peaculle, L.J., 2000. From Taylorism to Post-Taylorism Journal of Organizational Change, 13(5):452-467.
- Kitsches, R., 1993. Aspects of Max Weber’s Theory on Bureaucracy and NPM Approach. The Indian Journal of Public Administration, XIX (4):643-651.
- Pruijt, H., 2003. Teams between Neo-Taylorism and Anti-Taylorism. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24 (1):77-101.
- Pruijt, H., 2000. Repainting, Modifying, Smashing Taylorism. Journal of Organizational Change Administration, 13 (5):439-451.
- Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G., 2017. Public Administration Reform: A Comparative Analysis NPM, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State, 4. Edition, New York: Oxford University Press.
- Pollitt, C., 2015. Wickedness will not wait: climate change and public administration research, Public Money & Administration 35 (3):181-186 https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.102749 0.
- Pollitt, C., 2008/2009. An Overview of the Papers and Propositions of the First TransEuropean Dialogue (TEDI), The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1 (2):9-16.
- Ramos, C. and Milanesi, A., 2018. The Neo-Weberian State and the Neodevelopmentalist Strategies in Latin America: The Case of Uruguay. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0 (0):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318763525.
- Roehl, B., U., U., 2023. Automated decisionmaking and good administration: Views from inside the government machinery. Government Information Quarterly, 40 (4), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101864.
- Rosenbloom, D., Kravchuk, R. and Clerkin, M.R., 2022. Public Administration. 9th edition, UK: Routledge.
- Sanderson, K.S., 1988. The Neo-Weberian Revolution: A Theoretical Balance Sheet, Sociological Forum, 3 (2):307-314.
- Treiber, H., 2023. Critical reflections on Pollitt and Bouckaert’s construct of the neo-Weberian state (NWS) in their standard work on public management reform. Theor Soc 52, 179–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09478-0
- Vidal, M., 2024. From Labour Process Theory to Organisational Political Economy: A Response to Benassi, Ikeler and Wood. Critical Sociology, https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231219209.
- Vázquez, J. and Purificación, G.M., 2017. From Taylorism to neo-Taylorism: a 100-year journey in human resource administration. Menedzsment innovációk az üzleti és a nonbusiness szférákban, (ed.) Márton, V., Klára, K., SZTE Gazdaságtudományi Kar Szeged, 2017, pp.496-517.
- Ward, P., 2021. Administration Theory of Max Weber: Principles of bureaucracy, https://nanoglobals.com/glossary/administration-theory-max-weber-bureaucracy/
- Weber, M., 1946. From Max Weber Essays in Sociology. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Witzel, M. and Warner, M., 2015. Taylorism Revisited: Culture, Administration Theory and Paradigm Shift, Journal of General Administration. 40 (3):55-70.