Figure 1.

Results of the χ2 difference test between models (Source: Authors’ own research)
| Moderator/hypothesis | Path estimated | Δχ2 | Δdf | p | Hypothesis supported | Standardized coefficient estimate: Female | Standardized coefficient estimate: Male |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Full model | 18.559 | 5 | 0.002 | - | - | - |
| H6 | ACH→EI | 0.019 | 1 | 0.892 | No | - | - |
| H7 | ALT→EI | 1.682 | 1 | 0.195 | No | - | - |
| H8 | APP→EI | 10.398 | 1 | 0.001 | Yes | 0.224*** | 0.234*** |
| H9 | CON→EI | 0.10 | 1 | 0.919 | No | - | - |
| H10 | EFF→EI | 10.004 | 1 | 0.002 | Yes | 0.046*** | 0.048*** |
SEM analysis result (Source: Authors’ own research)
| Hypothesis | Standardized coefficients | SE | CR | P | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1: ACH → EI | 0.194 | 0.041 | 4.739 | *** | Supported |
| H2: ALT → EI | 0.276 | 0.028 | 9.817 | *** | Supported |
| H3: APP → EI | 0.073 | 0.035 | 2.073 | 0.038 | Supported |
| H4: CON → EI | 0.242 | 0.041 | 5.916 | *** | Supported |
| H5: EFF → EI | 0.252 | 0.038 | 6.560 | *** | Supported |
| Model fit indices | Obtained value | Suggested value | - | ||
| χ2/df | 2.704 | <3 | - | ||
| P | 0.044 | <0.05 | - | ||
| CFI | 0.997 | >0.90 | - | ||
| NFI | 0.996 | >0.90 | - | ||
| TLI | 0.982 | >0.90 | - | ||
| RMSEA | 0.042 | <0.07 | - | ||
Correlation analysis result (Source: Authors’ own research)
| - | ACH | ALT | APP | CON | EFF | EI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACH | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| ALT | 0.427** | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| APP | 0.380** | 0.236** | 1 | - | - | - |
| CON | 0.364** | 0.389** | 0.540** | 1 | - | - |
| EFF | 0.291** | 0.314** | 0.561** | 0.637** | 1 | - |
| EI | 0.416** | 0.497** | 0.415** | 0.535** | 0.512** | 1 |
Reliability, validity, and convergence of measurement constructs (Source: Authors’ own research)
| Construct | Cronbach’s alpha | CR | AVE | Item | Loading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Need for Achievement (ACH) | 0.807 | 0.906 | 0.583 | Ach1 | 0.647 |
| Ach2 | 0.709 | ||||
| Ach3 | 0.811 | ||||
| Ach4 | 0.763 | ||||
| Ach5 | 0.684 | ||||
| Ach6 | 0.792 | ||||
| Ach7 | 0.908 | ||||
| Entrepreneurial alertness (ALT) | 0.741 | 0.838 | 0.637 | Alt1 | 0.664 |
| Alt2 | 0.888 | ||||
| Alt3 | 0.825 | ||||
| Perceived appropriateness (APP) | 0.798 | 0.891 | 0.624 | App1 | 0.755 |
| App2 | 0.811 | ||||
| App3 | 0.781 | ||||
| App4 | 0.659 | ||||
| App5 | 0.920 | ||||
| Perceived consistency (CON) | 0.694 | 0.854 | 0.594 | Con1 | 0.714 |
| Con2 | 0.803 | ||||
| Con3 | 0.745 | ||||
| Con4 | 0.817 | ||||
| Perceived effectiveness (EFF) | 0.844 | 0.918 | 0.584 | Eff1 | 0.790 |
| Eff2 | 0.784 | ||||
| Eff3 | 0.746 | ||||
| Eff4 | 0.809 | ||||
| Eff5 | 0.807 | ||||
| Eff6 | 0.591 | ||||
| Eff7 | 0.730 | ||||
| Eff8 | 0.830 | ||||
| Entrepreneurial intention (EI) | 0.863 | 0.927 | 0.719 | EI1 | 0.872 |
| EI2 | 0.887 | ||||
| EI3 | 0.849 | ||||
| EI4 | 0.816 | ||||
| EI5 | 0.812 |
Normality test (Source: Authors’ own research)
| - | Descriptives | Tests of normality | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Skewness | Kurtosis | Kolmogorov–Smirnova | Shapiro–Wilk | ||||
| Statistic | df | Sig. | Statistic | df | Sig. | |||
| ACH | -0.807 | 1.711 | 0.100 | 945 | 0.085 | 0.950 | 945 | 0.075 |
| ALT | -0.055 | 0.098 | 0.110 | 945 | 0.145 | 0.976 | 945 | 0.275 |
| APP | -0.347 | 0.954 | 0.098 | 945 | 0.095 | 0.974 | 945 | 0.085 |
| CON | 0.092 | 0.832 | 0.113 | 945 | 0.075 | 0.972 | 945 | 0.090 |
| EFF | 0.033 | 0.527 | 0.066 | 945 | 0.215 | 0.990 | 945 | 0.125 |
| EI | -0.258 | 0.787 | 0.103 | 945 | 0.090 | 0.971 | 945 | 0.095 |
Model fit statistics of the measurement model (Source: Authors’ own research)
| - | Obtained value | Acceptable value |
|---|---|---|
| χ2/df | 3.950 | 3–5 |
| GFI | 0.936 | >0.90 |
| TLI | 0.882 | >0.85 |
| NFI | 0.872 | >0.85 |
| CFI | 0.901 | >0.90 |
| RMR | 0.125 | Close to 0 |
| RMSEA | 0.055 | <0.07 |
