Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Effect of Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Styles on Job Satisfaction Cover

The Effect of Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Styles on Job Satisfaction

Open Access
|Dec 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Conceptual model
(Source: Authors’ own research)
Conceptual model (Source: Authors’ own research)

Figure 2:

Structural equation model
(Source: Authors’ own research)
(Variables used in the research: BD: individual support, DK: using emotions, EU: intellectual stimulation, IEA: idealized influence-attributed, IED: idealized influence-behavior, İT: job satisfaction, IVM: inspiring motivation, KDD: evaluating your own emotions, KÖ: contingent reward)
Structural equation model (Source: Authors’ own research) (Variables used in the research: BD: individual support, DK: using emotions, EU: intellectual stimulation, IEA: idealized influence-attributed, IED: idealized influence-behavior, İT: job satisfaction, IVM: inspiring motivation, KDD: evaluating your own emotions, KÖ: contingent reward)

Results of the Measurement Model Source: Authors’ own research)

Structures/statementsFactor load
Transformational leadership (individual support) α = 0.969, CR = 0.972, AVE = 0.699
He/she spares time to nurture and guide me0.810
He/she sees people not only as members of a group, but also as individuals0.811
He/she helps me to improve my strengths0.838
He/she reviews important decisions to determine whether they are appropriate0.803
He/she seeks different approaches to solving problems0.848
He/she allows me to look at problems from many different perspectives0.879
He/she provides suggestions on how the assigned tasks can be performed in different ways0.869
He/she makes me feel proud and enjoy working with him/her0.860
He/she treats me in a way that creates respect for him/her0.803
He/she shows that they are confident and strong0.825
He/she clearly knows the importance of striving for a goal0.808
He/she emphasizes the importance of having a common sense of purpose0.819
He/she shows great interest and willingness when talking about things that need to be taken care of0.795
He/she creates a motivative vision for the future0.883
He/she expresses that he/she believes and trusts that the goals will be achieved0.878
Transactional leadership (contingent reward) α = 0.897, CR = 0.928, AVE = 0.763
He/she helps me in return for my efforts0.885
He/she discusses and specifies in detail who is responsible for achieving performance goals0.878
He/she clearly explains what the performer can achieve in return when performance goals are achieved0.873
He/she expresses his/her satisfaction when I fulfill what is expected of me0.857
Emotional intelligence (using emotions) α = 0.853, CR = 0.887, AVE = 0.529
I always set goals for myself and do my best to achieve these goals0.645
I have high internal motivation0.699
I always encourage myself to do my best0.705
Most of the time, I can understand why I feel some of my emotions0.744
I can understand my feelings well0.780
I really know how I feel0.783
I always know if I'm happy or not0.727
Job satisfaction α = 0.859, CR = 0.914, AVE = 0.781
I am quite satisfied with my current job0.909
Most days I go to work eagerly0.921
I find my job fun0.817

Divergent Validity Results (Fornell and Larcker criteria) (Source: Authors’ own research)

Transformational leadershipTransactional leadershipEmotional intelligenceJob satisfaction
Transformational leadership(0.836)---
Transactional leadership0.833(0.873)--
Emotional intelligence0.1730.144(0.727)-
Job satisfaction0.4660.4770.325(0.884)

Demographic Characteristics and Other Information of the Respondents (Source: Authors’ own research)

FrequencyPercentage
Age18–3011922.0
31–4017732.7
41–5018934.9
51 years and above5710.6
Total542100.0
GenderFemale27150.0
Male27150.0
Total542100.0
Working periodLess than 1 year193.5
1–5 years8315.3
6–10 years9617.7
11–15 years9217.0
16–20 years7313.5
20 years and above17933.0
Total542100.0
Role/position in the institutionLaborer9815.2
Civil servant17026.4
Specialist/assistant specialist8212.8
Technical staff335.1
Lower level manager284.4
Intermediate level manager9414.6
Senior manager375.8
Total643100
SectorPublic sector27650.9
Private sector26649.1
Total542100.0
Total643100

Research Design (Hypothesis Tests) (Source: Authors’ own research)

VariablesSt. βSSt valueP
Transactional leadershipJob satisfaction0.2950.0793.7570.000
Transformational leadershipJob satisfaction0.2200.0772.8710.004
Emotional IntelligenceJob satisfaction0.2530.0416.1790.000
Transactional leadershipEmotional intelligenceJob satisfaction-0.0010.0970.0070.994
Transformational leadershipEmotional intelligenceJob satisfaction0.1730.0971.7820.075

Divergent Validity Results (HTMT criteria) (Source: Authors’ own research)

Transformational leadershipTransactional leadershipEmotional intelligenceJob satisfaction
Transformational leadership----
Transactional leadership0.890---
Emotional intelligence0.1810.159--
Job satisfaction0.5050.5360.371-

Research Pattern Coefficients (Source: Authors’ own research)

VariablesVIFR2f2Q2
Transactional leadershipJob satisfaction3.2630.3050.0370.233
Transformational leadershipJob satisfaction3.2940.3050.0140.233
Transactional leadershipEmotional intelligence3.2630.0300.0000.014
Transformational leadershipEmotional intelligence3.2630.0300.0090.014
Emotional intelligenceJob satisfaction1.0310.3050.0890.233
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2024-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5661 | Journal ISSN: 2080-7279
Language: English
Page range: 311 - 324
Published on: Dec 31, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Yeşim MONUS, Sena ERDEN AYHÜN, published by Warsaw University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.