Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Innovative Behavior and Firm Competitive Advantage: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism Cover

Innovative Behavior and Firm Competitive Advantage: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism

By: Olawale Fatoki  
Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., Sambrook S., 2009. Towards a Multidisciplinary Definition of Innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), pp.1323–1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578.
  2. Barney, J., 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), pp.99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108.
  3. Baron, R., Tang., J., 2011. The Role of Entrepreneurs in Firm-Level Innovation: Joint Effects of Positive Affect, Creativity, and Environmental Dynamism. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), pp.49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.06.002.
  4. Bennet, N., Lemoine, G.J., 2014. What a Difference a Word Makes: Understanding the Threats to Performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), pp.1–7. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2406676.
  5. Bos-Nehles, A., Bondarouk, T., Nijenhuis, K., 2017. Innovative Work Behaviour in Knowledge-Intensive Public Sector Organizations: The Case of Supervisors in the Netherlands Fire Services. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 28(2), pp.299–398 DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2016.1244894.
  6. Boyd, B., Dess, G., Rasheed, A., 1993. Divergence Between Archival and Perceptual Measures of the Environment: Causes and Consequences. Academy of Management Review, 18, pp.204–226,.
  7. Castaneda, D.I., Cuellar, S., 2020. Knowledge Sharing and Innovation: A Systematic Review. Knowledge and Process Management, 27(3); pp.159–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1637.
  8. Ceglinski, P., 2017. The Concept of Competitive Advantages. Logic, Sources and Durability Journal of Positive Management, 7(3), pp.57–70. DOI: 10.12775/JPM.2016.016.
  9. Chatzoglou, P., Chatzoudes, D., 2018. The Role of Innovation in Building Competitive Advantages: an Empirical Investigation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(1), pp. 44–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2017-0015.
  10. Chittithaworn, C., Islam, A., Keawchana, T., Yusuf, D.H.M., 2011. Factors Affecting Business Success of Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Thailand. Asian Social Science 7(5), pp.180–190. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n5p180.
  11. Dess, G., Beard, D., 1984. Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), pp.52–73.
  12. Duncan, R.B., 1972. Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), pp.313–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392145.
  13. Hou, B., Hong, J., Zhu, K. and Zhou, Y., 2019. Paternalistic Leadership and Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp.562–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2018-0141.
  14. Hosseini, A.S., Soltani, S., Mehdizadeh, M., 2018. Competitive Advantage and Its Impact on New Product Development Strategy (Case Study: Toos Nirro Technical Firm. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(2), pp.1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4020017.
  15. Jacobs, M., Maritz, R., 2020. Dynamic Strategy: Investigating the Ambidexterity–Performance Relationship. South African Journal of Business Management, 51(1), a1643. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v51i1.1643.
  16. Jiao, H., Alon, I., Cui, Y., 2011. Environmental Dynamism, Innovation, and Dynamic Capabilities: The Case of China. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 5(2), pp.131–144. DOI: 10.1108/17506201111131550.
  17. Lee, K., Yoo, J., 2019. How Does Open Innovation Lead Competitive Advantage? A Dynamic Capability View Perspective. Plos One 14(11), e0223405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223405.
  18. Li, D., Liu, Y., 2014. Dynamic Capabilities, Environmental Dynamism, and Competitive Advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), pp.2793–2799, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.007.
  19. Matchaba-Hove, T., Farrington, S., Sharp, G., 2015. The Entrepreneurial Orientation – Performance Relationship: a South African Small Business Perspective. The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management, 7, pp.36–68.
  20. Mohammad, H.I., 2019. Mediating Effect of Organizational Learning and Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism on the Relationship Between Strategic Change and Firm Performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(2), pp.275–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2018-0064.
  21. Nandakumar, M.K., Ghobadian, A., O'Regan, N., 2010. Business-Level Strategy and Performance: The Moderating Effects of Environment and Structure. Management Decision 48(6), pp.907–939. DOI: 10.1108/00251741011053460.
  22. Nkomo, S.M., 2015. Challenges for Management and Business Education in a “Developmental. State: The Case of South Africa. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(2), pp.242–258.
  23. Nunnally, J.C., 1978. Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  24. Okeyo, WO., 2014. The Influence of Business Environmental Dynamism, Complexity and Munificence on Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 4(8), pp.59–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v4i8.587.
  25. Omri, W., 2015. Innovative Behavior and Venture Performance of SMEs: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(2), pp.195–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2013-0015.
  26. Pasara, M., Garidzirai, R., 2020. Causality Effects Among Gross Capital Formation, Unemployment and Economic Growth in South Africa. Economies, 8(26), pp.1–12.
  27. Pérez-Luño, A., Gopalakrishnan, S., Cabrera R., 2014. Innovation and Performance: The Role of Environmental Dynamism on the Success of Innovation Choices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(3), pp.499–510.
  28. Permana, A., Laksmana, A., Ellitan, L., 2017. The Effect of Environmental Dynamism, Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, and Deliberate Organizational Learning on the SME Performance with Dynamic Capabilities as Mediator. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(7), pp.540–551. DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4750.
  29. Purc, E., Laguna M., 2019. Personal Values and Innovative Behaviour of Employees. Frontiers of Psychology. 10 (865), pp.1–16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00865.
  30. Guttel, W.H., Hermann, F., Kessler, A., 2017. Environmental Dynamism, Hostility, and Dynamic Capabilities in Medium-Sized Enterprises. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 18(3), pp.185–194 https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750317723219.
  31. Roper and Love, 2017. Knowledge Context, Learning and Innovation: An Integrating Framework. Industry and Innovation, 28(4), 339–364 https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1414744.
  32. Seo, E., Kim C., Kim, K. 2020. A Study on the Mechanisms Linking Environmental Dynamism to Innovation Performance. Sustainability, 2020, 12, 9999; doi:10.3390/su12239999.
  33. Senyard, J.M, Davidsson, P., Steffens, P., 2015 Environmental Dynamism as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Bricolage and Firm Performance. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1, pp.14893–14893. DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.14893abstract.
  34. Sharma, S., Durand, R.M., Gur-Arie, O., 1981. Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), pp.291–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150970.
  35. Śliwa, M and Patalas-Maliszewska, J., 2016. A Strategic Knowledge Map for the Research and Development Department in a Manufacturing Company. Foundations of Management, 8, pp.151–165. https://doi.org/10.1515/fman-2016-0012.
  36. Small Enterprise Development Agency, 2019. SMME Quarterly Update 1st Quarter 2019. http://www.seda.org.za/Publications/Publications/SMME%20Quarterly%202019-Q1.pdf.
  37. SME Landscape Report, 2019. An Assessment of South Africa's SME landscape. https://smesouthafrica.co.za/Reports_and_Surveys.
  38. Struwig, F.W., Kruger, J., Nuwagaba, G., 2019. The Influence of the Business Environment on the Growth of Informal Businesses in Uganda. The Southern Africa Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management. 11(1): a200. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajesbm.v11i1.200.
  39. Teece, D., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp.509–533. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.390.9899. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:73.0.CO;2-Z.
  40. Ting, H., Wang, H., Wang, D., 2012. The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism on the Influence of Innovation Strategy and Firm Performance. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(5), pp.517–520.
  41. Surty, S., Scheepers, C.B., 2020. Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism on Leadership Practices and Employees’ Response to Change in South Africa. Management Research Review. 43(7), pp.787–810. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2019-0094.
  42. Van Uden, A., Vermeulen, P., Knoben, J., 2019. Paralyzed by the Dashboard Light: Environmental Characteristics and Firm's Scanning Capabilities in East Africa. Strategic Organisation, 17(2), pp.241–265 https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018755320.
  43. Wang, H., 2014. Theories for Competitive Advantage. In: H. Hasan (Eds.). Being Practical with Theory: A Window into Business Research, pp.33–43. Wollongong, Australia: THEORI. http://eurekaconnection.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/p-33-43-theories-of-competitive-advantage-theoriebook_finaljan2014-v3.pdf.
  44. Wang, Y., 2016. Environmental Dynamism, Trust and Dynamic Capabilities of Family Businesses. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(5), pp.643–670. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0234.
  45. West, M.A., Farr, J.L., 1990. Innovation at Work. In West, M.A. and Farr, J.L. (Eds), Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies, pp.3–13. Chichester: Wiley.
  46. Zhu, X., Wang, J., Liu, B., Di, X., 2020. Inventory Stickiness, Environmental Dynamism, Financial Constraints and Survival of New SMEs in China. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-11-2019-0401.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2021-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5661 | Journal ISSN: 2080-7279
Language: English
Page range: 159 - 170
Published on: Oct 14, 2021
Published by: Warsaw University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Olawale Fatoki, published by Warsaw University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.