Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Seed priming and foliar application of GA3 enhance disease control in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cover

Seed priming and foliar application of GA3 enhance disease control in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Open Access
|Feb 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Selected concentrations and durations of priming agents and GA.

Seed priming agentConcentrationDuration (hr)
Control (T0)
Moringa leaf extract (T1)Leaf extract: water @ 1:3018
NaCl (T2)1%36
PEG 6000 (T3)10%12
GA3 (T4)100 ppm24
KNO3 (T5)5%24
Thiourea (T6)1000 ppm24
Distilled water (T7)-12
KH2PO4 (T8)2%6
NAA (T9)0.5 mmol · L−16
Foliar application of GA3 (G1)
No application of GA3 (G0)

1 GA, gibberellic acid; PEG, polyethylene glycol.

Figure 1.

Bacterial wilt disease.

Table 2.

Influence of different priming materials in combination with or without GA3 on the incidence of bacterial wilt disease in tomato.

GA32019–2020
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9Mean G
G022.07* (28.36)14.41 (22.71)18.55 (25.88)14.24 (22.58)18.68 (25.97)15.03 (23.21)18.21 (25.63)21.54 (28.00)13.60 (22.05)18.11 (25.56)17.44 (24.99)
G120.37 (27.19)13.07 (21.61)17.05 (24.77)12.67 (21.28)16.98 (24.71)13.96 (22.35)16.62 (24.44)20.12 (27.01)11.98 (20.69)16.78 (24.56)15.96 (23.86)
Mean T21.22 (27.78) a13.74 (22.16) f17.80 (25.32) c13.46 (21.93) g17.83 (25.34) c14.49 (22.78) e17.41 (25.03) d20.83 (27.51) b12.79 (21.37) h17.45 (25.06) d
TGT at same level of GG at same level of T
SEM (±)0.0820.0750.1140.130
LSD (0.05)0.2440.456NSNS
CV (%)0.8231.6800.8020.802
GA32020–2021
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9Mean G
G023.12 (29.08)15.57 (23.63)19.67 (26.68)15.22 (23.36)19.68 (26.69)16.58 (24.41)19.50 (26.56)22.99 (28.99)14.52 (22.80)19.58 (26.62)18.64 (25.88)
G121.85 (28.22)14.33 (22.65)18.44 (25.80)14.01 (22.39)18.41 (25.77)15.46 (23.55)18.26 (25.67)21.74 (28.13)13.63 (22.08)18.35 (25.73)17.45 (25.00)
Mean T22.49 (28.65) a14.95 (23.14) d19.05 (26.24) b14.62 (22.88) d19.04 (26.23) b16.02 (23.98) c18.88 (26.11) b22.36 (28.56) a14.08 (22.44) e18.96 (26.18) b
TGT at same level of GG at same level of T
SEM (±)0.1190.0480.1380.106
LSD (0.05)0.3540.295NSNS
CV (%)1.1471.0430.6790.679

1 Note: G = with GA3 and without GA3 treatment, G0 = without GA3, G1 with GA3, T = priming treatment, T0 = control, T1 = moringa leaf extract, T2 = 1% NaCl, T3 = 10% PEG, T4 = 100 ppm GA3, T5 = 5% KNO3, T6 = 1000 ppm thiourea, T7 = distilled water, T8 = 2% KH2PO4, T9 = 0.5 mol/L NAA.

1* In brackets, the arcsine value is given.

1 CV, coefficient of variation; GA, gibberellic acid; LSD, least significant difference; NAA, 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid; NS, Non-significant; PEG, polyethylene glycol; SEM: standard error of mean.

Figure 2.

Collar rot disease.

Table 3.

Influence of different priming materials in combination with or without GA3 on the incidence of collar rot disease in tomato.

GA32019–2020
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9Mean G
G015.65* (23.70)10.38 (19.26)13.27 (21.78)9.24 (18.19)14.02 (22.40)11.04 (19.86)12.35 (21.01)15.17 (23.32)9.90 (18.81)14.30 (22.63)12.53 (21.10)
G113.91 (22.31)9.00 (17.95)11.86 (20.58)8.11 (17.06)12.69 (21.30)9.62 (18.55)11.06 (19.88)13.87 (22.28)8.65 (17.60)13.20 (21.72)11.20 (19.92)
Mean T14.78 (23.00) a9.69 (18.60) h12.57 (21.18) e8.68 (17.63) J13.36 (21.85) d10.33 (19.21) g11.71 (20.44) f14.52 (22.80) b9.27 (18.21) i13.75 (22.18) c
TGT at same level of GG at same level of T
SEM (±)0.0860.0200.1370.145
LSD (0.05)0.2540.121NSNS
CV (%)1.0200.5301.2821.282
GA32020–2021
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9Mean G
G016.70 (24.50)11.81 (20.54)14.39 (22.70)10.66 (19.51)15.25 (23.38)12.17 (20.85)13.70 (22.14)16.53 (24.37)11.23 (20.03)15.72 (23.75)13.82 (22.18)
G115.66 (23.71)10.33 (19.21)13.12 (21.65)9.43 (18.36)13.89 (22.30)11.00 (19.82)12.23 (20.90)15.19 (23.34)9.94 (18.85)14.28 (22.61)12.51 (21.08)
Mean T16.18 (24.10) a11.07 (19.88) h13.76 (22.18) e10.04 (18.94)i14.57 (22.84) d11.58 (20.34) g12.97 (21.52) f15.86 (23.85) b10.59 (19.44) i15.00 (23.18) c
TGT at same level of GG at same level of T
SEM (±)0.0770.0130.0990.084
LSD (0.05)0.2290.080NSNS
CV (%)0.8730.3310.7010.701

1 Note: G = with GA3 and without GA3 treatment, G0 = without GA3, G1 = with GA3, T = priming treatment, T0 = control, T1 = moringa leaf extract, T2 = 1% NaCl, T3 =10% PEG, T4 = 100 ppm GA3, T5 = 5% KNO3, T6 = 1000 ppm thiourea, T7 = distilled water, T8 = 2% KH2PO4, T9 = 0.5 mol/L NAA.

1* In brackets, the arcsine value is given.

1 CV, coefficient of variation; GA3, gibberellic acid; LSD, least significant difference; NAA, 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid; NS, Non-significant; PEG, polyethylene glycol; SEM: standard error of mean.

Figure 3.

Target leaf spot disease.

Table 4.

Influence of different priming materials in combination with or without GA3 on the PDI of the target leaf spot.

GA32019–2020
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9Mean G
G038.73* (38.78)29.10 (32.96)30.89 (34.07)32.90 (35.30)36.16 (37.26)27.81 (32.15)33.82 (35.86)37.90 (38.29)26.87 (31.55)36.96 (37.74)33.11 (35.40)
G136.64 (37.55)26.67 (31.42)28.29 (32.45)30.22 (33.66)33.60 (35.73)26.36 (31.22)31.82 (34.64)35.73 (37.01)24.70 (30.13)34.24 (36.12)30.83 (33.99)
Mean T37.69 (38.16) a27.88 (32.19) h29.59 (33.26) g31.56 (34.48)f34.88 (36.50) d27.09 (31.68) i32.82 (35.25) e36.82 (37.65) b25.79 (30.84) j35.60 (36.93) c
TGT at same level of GG at same level of T
SEM (±)0.0500.0320.0660.066
LSD (0.05)0.1470.1950.1940.244
CV (%)0.3480.5070.3010.301
GA32020–2021
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9Mean G
G040.11 (39.59)30.27 (33.69)32.39 (35.00)34.17 (36.08)37.41 (38.00)29.20 (33.02)35.24 (36.71)39.33 (39.13)28.31 (32.46)38.36 (38.56)34.48 (36.22)
G137.95 (38.32)28.14 (32.35)29.59 (33.27)31.63 (34.53)34.99 (36.57)27.78 (32.12)33.04 (35.39)37.08 (37.81)26.22 (31.13)35.66 (36.96)32.21 (34.85)
Mean T39.03 (38.96) a29.20 (33.02)h30.99 (34.13) g32.90 (35.30) f36.20 (37.28) d28.49 (32.57) i34.14 (36.05) e38.20 (38.47) b27.27 (31.79) j37.01 (37.76) c
TGT at same level of GG at same level of T
SEM (±)0.0550.0140.0790.077
LSD (0.05)0.1650.0850.2350.237
CV (%)0.3820.2150.3900.390

1 Note: G = with GA3 and without GA3 treatment, G0 = without GA3, G1 = with GA3, T = priming treatment, T0 = control, T1 = moringa leaf extract, T2 = 1% NaCl, T3 = 10% PEG, T4 = 100 ppm GA3, T5 = 5% KNO3, T6 = 1000 ppm thiourea, T7 = Distilled water, T8 = 2% KH2PO4, T9 = 0.5 mol/L NAA.

1* In brackets, the arcsine value is given.

1 CV, coefficient of variation; GA, gibberellic acid; LSD, least significant difference; NAA, 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid; NS, Non-significant; PDI, percent disease index; PEG, polyethylene glycol; SEM: standard error of mean.

Figure 4.

Early leaf blight disease.

Table 5.

Influence of different priming materials in combination with or without GA3 on the PDI of early blight.

GA32019–2020
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9Mean G
G030.72* (33.97)21.46 (27.94)23.19 (29.13)24.29 (29.86)27.58 (32.00)20.95 (27.59)25.98 (30.97)29.83 (33.42)19.94 (26.88)28.31 (32.47)25.23 (30.42)
G128.76 (32.75)21.09 (27.69)21.98 (28.30)23.51 (29.34)26.55 (31.34)20.16 (27.03)24.96 (30.31)27.97 (32.25)17.27 (24.93)27.00 (31.63)23.93 (29.56)
Mean T29.74 (33.36) a21.28 (27.82) h22.59 (28.72) g23.90 (29.60) f27.06 (31.67) d20.55 (27.31) i25.47 (30.64) e28.90 (32.83) b18.61 (25.91) j27.66 (32.05) c
TGT at same level of GG at same level of T
SEM (±)0.0370.0210.0550.059
LSD (0.05)0.1090.1280.1620.197
CV (%)0.2990.3850.3310.331
GA32020–2021
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9Mean G
G032.26 (34.92)22.69 (28.79)24.64 (30.09)25.58 (30.71)28.97 (32.88)22.33 (28.54)27.37 (31.86)31.22 (34.28)21.18 (27.75)29.60 (33.27)26.58 (31.31)
G130.08 (33.58)22.29 (28.52)23.13 (29.09)24.86 (30.24)27.93 (32.22)21.40 (27.91)26.18 (31.10)29.18 (33.01)18.63 (25.94)28.21 (32.40)25.19 (30.40)
Mean T31.17 (34.25) a22.49 (28.65) h23.89 (29.59) g25.22 (30.48) f28.45 (32.55) d21.87 (28.23) i26.77 (31.48) e30.20 (33.64) b19.91 (26.84)j28.91 (32.84) c
TGT at same level of GG at same level of T
SEM (±)0.0340.0180.0410.035
LSD (0.05)0.1020.1140.1240.138
CV (%)0.2740.3320.1840.184

1 Note: G = with GA3 and without GA3 treatment, G0 = without GA3, with GA3, T = priming treatment, T0 = control, T1 = moringa leaf extract, T2 = 1% NaCl, T3 = 10% PEG, T4 = 100 ppm GA3, T5 = 5% KNO3, T6 = 1000 ppm thiourea, T7 = Distilled water, T8 = 2% KH2PO4, T9 = 0.5 mol/L NAA.

1* In brackets, the arcsine value is given.

1 CV, coefficient of variation; GA3, gibberellic acid; LSD, least significant difference; NAA, 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid; NS, Non-significant; PDI, percent disease index; PEG, polyethylene glycol; SEM: standard error of mean.

Figure 5.

Late blight disease.

Table 6.

Influence of different priming materials in combination with or without GA3 on the PDI of late blight.

GA32019–2020
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9Mean G
G025.63* (30.74)17.80 (25.33)19.03 (26.23)19.91 (26.86)23.04 (29.02)17.25 (24.92)22.39 (28.58)24.92 (30.28)16.56 (24.39)23.91 (29.61)21.05 (27.60)
G124.67 (30.11)16.92 (24.67)18.48 (25.83)19.16 (26.32)22.29 (28.52)16.38 (24.26)20.93 (27.58)23.92 (29.61)14.92 (23.12)23.32 (29.21)20.10 (26.92)
Mean T25.15 (30.43) a17.36 (25.00) h18.76 (26.03) g19.54 (26.59) f22.67 (28.77) d16.82 (24.59) i21.66 (28.08) e24.42 (29.94) b15.74 (23.76) j23.62 (29.41) c
TGT at same level of GG at same level of T
SEM (±)0.0130.0080.0180.019
LSD (0.05)0.0400.0540.0480.062
C.V. (%)0.1210.1800.0830.083
GA32020–2021
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9Mean G
G026.92 (31.58)19.12 (26.29)20.37 (27.18)21.33 (27.85)24.31 (29.87)18.69 (25.98)23.76 (29.51)26.21 (31.12)17.95 (25.44)25.32 (30.54)22.40 (28.54)
G125.87 (30.90)18.16 (25.59)19.78 (26.76)20.37 (27.18)23.66 (29.44)17.56 (25.15)22.16 (28.42)25.11 (30.40)16.20 (24.12)24.59 (30.06)21.35 (27.80)
Mean T26.40 (31.24) a18.64 (25.94) h20.07 (26.97) g20.85 (27.52) f23.99 (29.66) d18.12 (25.56) i22.96 (28.97) e25.66 (30.76) b17.08 (24.78) j24.96 (30.30) c
TGT at same level of GG at same level of T
SEM (±)0.0530.0290.0770.081
LSD (0.05)0.1560.1790.2280.273
C.V. (%)0.4570.5730.4850.485

1 Note: G = with GA3 and without GA3 treatment, G0 = without GA3, G1 with GA3, T = priming treatment, T0 = control, T1 = moringa leaf extract, T2 = 1% NaCl, T3 = 10% PEG, T4 = 100 ppm GA3, T5 = 5% KNO3, T6 1000 ppm thiourea, T7 = distilled water, T7 = 2% KH2PO4, T9 = 0.5 mol/L NAA.

1* In brackets, the arcsine value is given.

1 CV, coefficient of variation; GA3, gibberellic acid; LSD, least significant difference; NAA, 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid; NS, Non-significant; PDI, percent disease index; PEG, polyethylene glycol; SEM: standard error of mean.

Figure 6.

Tomato leaf curl viral disease.

Table 7.

Influence of different priming materials in combination with or without GA3 on the PDI of tomato leaf curl viral disease.

GA32019–2020
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9Mean G
G019.78* (26.77)13.66 (22.11)17.09 (24.80)13.51 (21.98)17.04 (24.76)14.27 (22.60)15.70 (23.74)17.51 (25.11)13.17 (21.70)16.62 (24.44)15.84 (23.80)
G118.51 (25.85)11.15 (19.96)15.94 (23.92)11.06 (19.88)14.89 (23.10)11.85 (20.57)14.66 (22.92)17.76 (25.30)10.71 (19.56)14.88 (23.09)14.14 (22.41)
Mean T19.15 (26.31) a12.41 (21.03) f16.52 (24.36) c12.29 (20.93) f15.96 (23.93) c13.06 (21.59) e15.18 (23.33) d17.63 (25.20) b11.94 (20.63) f15.75 (23.77) c
TGT at same level of GG at same level of T
SEM (±)0.0580.0330.0630.048
LSD (0.05)0.1730.1980.1900.213
CV (%)0.6160.7730.2860.286
GA32020–2021
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9Mean G
G021.18 (27.75)14.85 (23.06)18.51 (25.85)14.79 (23.02)18.18 (25.61)15.75 (23.78)17.14 (24.83)18.74 (26.01)14.57 (22.84)17.80 (25.33)17.15 (24.81)
G119.91 (26.86)12.44 (21.08)17.22 (24.90)12.50 (21.14)16.11 (24.05)13.13 (21.66)16.13 (24.06)19.13 (26.30)12.06 (20.75)16.20 (24.12)15.48 (23.49)
Mean T20.54 (27.30) a13.64 (22.07) g17.87 (25.37) c13.65 (22.08) g17.15 (24.83) d14.44 (22.72) f16.63 (24.45) e18.93 (26.16) b13.31 (21.80) h17.00 (24.73) d
TGT at same level of GG at same level of T
SEM (±)0.0580.0060.0770.070
LSD (0.05)0.1700.0420.2280.207
CV (%)0.5810.1570.5190.519

1 Note: G = with GA3 and without GA3 treatment, G0 = without GA3, with GA3, T = priming treatment, T0 = control, T1 = moringa leaf extract, T2 = 1% NaCl, T3 = 10% PEG, T4 = 100 ppm GA3, T5 = 5% KNO3, T6 = 1000 ppm thiourea, T7 = distilled water, T8 = 2% KH2PO4, T9 = 0.5 mol/L NAA.

1* In brackets, the arcsine value is given.

1 CV, coefficient of variation; GA3, gibberellic acid; LSD, least significant difference; NAA, 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid; NS, Non-significant; PDI, percent disease index; PEG, polyethylene glycol; SEM: standard error of mean.

Figure S1.

Reduction (%) in disease incidence after seed priming (average over 2 years).

Figure S2.

Reduction (%) in disease severity after seed priming (average over 2 years). Note: T0 = control, T1 = moringa leaf extract, T2 = 1% NaCl, T3 = 10% PEG, T4 = 100 ppm GA3, T5 = 5% KNO3, T6 = 1000 ppm Thiourea, T7 = distilled water, T8 = 2% KH2PO4, T9 = 0.5 m mol · L−1 NAA. PEG, polyethylene glycol.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2025-0025 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Language: English
Page range: 389 - 406
Submitted on: Mar 1, 2025
Accepted on: Nov 18, 2025
Published on: Feb 13, 2026
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2026 Jui Ray, Pabitra Kumar Ghosh, Sanjoy Kumar Bordolui, Raju Das, Venugopalan Visha Kumari, Viliam Bárek, Marian Brestic, Ahmed Gaber, Akbar Hossain, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.