Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Summary of analysis of variance (‘F’ value) for net photosynthesis (A), stomatal conductance (gs), internal CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration rate (E), WUEi, and instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (CEi) as a function of different rootstocks (R) and scion cultivars (S) of mango during its scion phase_
| SV | A | gs | Ci | E | WUEi | CEi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rootstocks (R) | 26.86** | 9.92** | 6.03** | 5.68** | 3.16ns | 15.47** |
| Scion (S) | 22.22** | 13.27* | 14.80** | 8.95** | 2.66ns | 8.10** |
| R × S | 4.95** | 2.44* | 2.91* | 2.19* | 1.06ns | 4.08** |
| CV (%) | 14.94 | 31.65 | 9.02 | 31.85 | 24.63 | 13.73 |
Pearson correlation between PGS_ PH, RSD, CLa_ CLb, and CLt, net photosynthesis (A), stomatai conductance (gs), internal CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration (E), water use efficiency (WUEi), instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (CEi), TSC, and St as a function of different rootstocks (R) and scion cultivars (S) of mango during the seedling formation phase_
| Var. | PGS | PH | RSD | CLa | CIb | CLt | A | gs | Ci | E | WUEi | CEi | TSC | St |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGS | 1 | |||||||||||||
| PH | –0.21 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| RSD | –0.01 | 0.82** | 1 | |||||||||||
| CLa | –0.41 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 1 | ||||||||||
| CIb | –0.17 | 0.33 | 0.10 | 0.88** | 1 | |||||||||
| CLt | –0.30 | 0.31 | 0.06 | 0.97** | 0.97** | 1 | ||||||||
| A | 0.06 | 0.75** | 0.50 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 1 | |||||||
| gs | 0.11 | 0.72** | 0.50 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.98** | 1 | ||||||
| Ci | 0.02 | 0.59* | 0.28 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.85** | 0.91** | 1 | |||||
| E | 0.00 | 0.63* | 0.28 | 0.04 | –0.01 | 0.01 | 0.92** | 0.94** | 0.89** | 1 | ||||
| WUEi | 0.15 | –0.26 | 0.21 | –0.12 | –0.01 | –0.06 | –0.62· | –0.64· | –0.77** | –0.85** | 1 | |||
| CEi | 0.04 | 0.68* | 0.52 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.92** | 0.83** | 0.58* | 0.76** | –0.41 | 1 | ||
| TSC | –0.42 | 0.53 | 0.07 | 0.60* | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.47 | –0.47 | 0.42 | 1 | |
| St | 0.36 | –0.62* | –0.46 | –0.36 | –0.30 | –0.34 | –0.26 | –0.29 | –0.26 | –0.27 | 0.18 | –0.16 | –0.38 | 1 |
| –1 | 0 | 1 |
Summary of analysis of variance (‘F’ value) for PGS, PH, RSD, CLa, CLb and CLt, TSC, and St as a function of different rootstocks (R) and scion cultivars (C) of mango during the scion formation phase_
| SV | PGS | PH | RSD | CLa | CLb | CLt | TSC | St |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rootstocks (R) | 536.2** | 56.59** | 51.57** | 20.15** | 18.62** | 21.56** | 46.62** | 3.60* |
| Scion (S) | 1098** | 2.89* | 0.58ns | 4.38** | 11.43** | 7.78** | 3.09* | 2.97* |
| R × S | 109.9** | 5.10** | 2.05** | 3.86** | 3.92** | 3.89** | 1.84* | 2.95* |
| CV (%) | 3.91 | 10.71 | 12.53 | 8.45 | 22.51 | 11.66 | 17.74 | 20.51 |