Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Outcomes of foliar iodine application on growth, minerals and antioxidants in tomato plants under salt stress Cover

Outcomes of foliar iodine application on growth, minerals and antioxidants in tomato plants under salt stress

Open Access
|Feb 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Representation of treatments and controls.

Salt conditionsNaCl (salt control) 35 plantsNaCl + KIO3 35 plants
Normal conditionsAbsolute control (only Steiner solution)
35 plants

[i] KIO3, potassium iodate.

Figure 1

Effect of iodine application in vegetative biomass, in three samplings [(1) 41 dat, (2) 71 dat, (3) 125 dat]; the units are expressed in grams. Means with same letters do not show statistically significant differences, p ≤ 0.05, vertical bars represent standard deviations. KIO3, potassium iodate.

Figure 2

Effects of iodine application in total tomato yield expressed in kg F.W.; treatments control, salt control (NaCl) and KIO3. Means with same letters do not show statistically significant differences, p ≤ 0.05, vertical bars represent standard deviations. KIO3, potassium iodate.

Table 2

Effects of iodine on fruit number, plant fresh weight, height, number of foliole and stem diameter of tomato plants.

TreatmentFruit numberFresh weight (g)Height (cm)
Sampling123123
NaCl21.6 c*231.96 b609.32 b784.80 b52.40 b61.70 b73.60 b
KIO3 + NaCl34.2 b245.96 b683.16 b760.22 b51.10 b61.80 b70.80 b
Control48.8 a394.42 a833.06 a1914.92 a59.80 a94.70 a96.00 a
Foliole numberStem diameter (cm)
123123
NaCl151.00 b294.60 b780.80 b9.80 b11.80 a15.00 b
KIO3 + NaCl142.40 b307.40 b603.00 b10.80 b13.20 a15.20 b
Control217.50 a462.20 a1476.00 a14.40 a12.80 a18.60 a

* Means with same letters do not show statistically significant differences, p ≤ 0.05.

KIO3, potassium iodate.

Table 3

Effects of iodine on macroelement content in tomato leaves.

TreatmentsNPCaKMgNa
(g · kg−1 D.W.)
NaCl19.10 b*3.56 a36.83 bc21.03 a16.03 a46.88 a
KIO3 + NaCl22.60 a4.05 a31.60 c23.63 a13.16 a35.27 a
Control17.23 b2.94 a44.52 a29.66 a19.91 a7.14 b

* Means with same letters do not show statistically significant differences, p ≤ 0.05.

KIO3, potassium iodate.

Table 4

Effect of iodine on microelement content in tomato leaves.

TreatmentsFeZnCuMn
(mg · kg−1 D.W.)
NaCl192.34 a*51.60 a13.43 a245.23 a
KIO3 + NaCl145.80 a43.90 a17.12 a241.68 a
Control100.86 b41.50 a5.63 b183.29 a

* Means with same letters do not show statistically significant differences, p ≤ 0.05.

KIO3, potassium iodate.

Table 5

Effects of iodine on macroelement content in tomato fruit.

TreatmentsNPCaKMgNa
(g · kg−1 D.W.)
NaCl24.02 a2.59 a1.00 bc58.31 a2.72 a6.12 a
KIO3 + NaCl18.27 b2.51 a0.53 c52.32 a2.01 a9.04 a
Control15.39 c2.12 a2.02 a58.29 a2.68 a2.32 b

* Means with same letters do not show statistically significant differences, p ≤ 0.05.

KIO3, potassium iodate.

Table 6

Effect of iodine on microelement content in tomato fruits.

TreatmentsFeZnCuMn
(mg · kg−1 D.W.)
NaCl2.96 b27.69 a11.87 a12.81 a
KIO3 + NaCl1.83 b24.35 a10.12 a10.89 a
Control28.04 a23.64 b8.38 a13.29 a

* Means with same letters do not show statistically significant differences, p ≤ 0.05.

KIO3, potassium iodate.

Figure 3

Iodine concentration in leaves and fruits of tomato, expressed in mg · kg−1 D.W. Means with same letters do not show statistically significant differences, p ≤ 0.05, vertical bars represent standard deviations. KIO3, potassium iodate.

Table 7

Effect of iodine on antioxidant content in tomato fruit

TreatmentsCA (mM trolox)AsA* (g · kg−1)Lic (mg · kg−1)GSH (g · kg−1)Prot (g · kg−1)CAT (U · min−1)GPX (U · min−1)APX (U · min−1)SOD (U · min−1)
NaCl51.8 a**37 b19 a0.68 a16.1 b0.12 a1.6 a0.01 a5.68 a
NaCl+KIO321.2 b59.5 a4.4 b0.87 a16.2 a0.11 a1.6 a0.01 a5.40 a
Control29.6 b70.8 a22.5 a0.99 a12.5 c0.14 a3.1 b0.01a6.52 a

* CA, Antioxidant capacity; AsA, ascorbic acid; APX, ascorbate peroxidase; Lic, lycopene; GSH, gluthatione; Prot, total proteins; CAT, catalase; GPX, glutathione peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; KIO3, potassium iodate.

** Means with same letters do not show statistically significant differences, p ≤ 0.05.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2022-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Language: English
Page range: 27 - 37
Submitted on: Nov 26, 2021
Accepted on: Jan 24, 2022
Published on: Feb 27, 2022
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2022 José E. García Fuentes, Biaani F. Herrera Castellanos, Erika N. Rivas Martínez, Willian A. Narváez Ortiz, Adalberto Benavides Mendoza, Julia Medrano Macías, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.