Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Grafted vegetables – the influence of rootstock and scion on postharvest quality Cover

Grafted vegetables – the influence of rootstock and scion on postharvest quality

Folia Horticulturae
Volume 26 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jan 2015
References

References

  1. Alexopoulos A.A., Kondylis A., Passam H.C., 2007. Fruit yield and quality of watermelon in relation to grafting. J. Food Agric. Environ. 5: T178-179.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Aloni B., Cohen R., Kar ni L., Aka s H., Edelstein M., 2010. Hormonal signaling in rootstock-scion interactions. Sci. Hortic. 127: 119-126.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Amadio A., 2004. Alternatives to methyl bromide adopted for cucurbit production in projects funded by Montreal Protocol. Proc. Fifth International Conference on Alternatives to Methyl Bromide, Lisbon: 71-74.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Arvanitoyannis I.S., Khah E.M., Chr istak ou E.C., Bletsos F.A., 2005. Effect of grafting and modified atmosphere packaging on eggplant quality parameters during storage. Intl. J. Food Sci. Technol. 40: 311-322.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Bekhra di F., Kashi A., Delsha d M., 2011. Effect of three cucurbits rootstocks on vegetative and yield of 'Charleston Gray' watermelon. Intl. J. Plant Prod. 5: 105-110.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Calatayud A., Roca D., Mar tínez P. F., 2006. Spatial- temporal variations in rose leaves under water stress conditions studied by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 44: 564-573.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Calatayud A., San Bautista A., Pascual B., Mar otob J.V., López-Galar za S., 2013. Use of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging as diagnostic technique to predict compatibility in melon graft. Sci. Hortic. 149: 13-18.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Chávez-Mendoza C., Sánch ez E., Car vaja l-Millán E., Muñoz-Márquez E., Guevara -Aguilar A., 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Characterization of the nutraceutical quality and antioxidant activity in bell pepper in response to grafting. Molecules 18: 15689-15703.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Cohen R., Tyutyunik J., Fallik E., Oka Y., Tadmor Y., Edelstein M., 2014. Phytopathological evaluation of exotic watermelon germplasm as a basis for rootstock breeding. Sci. Hort. 165: 203-210.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Colla G., Roupha el Y., Leonar di C., Bie Z., 2010. Role of grafting in vegetable crops grown under saline conditions. Sci. Hort. 127: 147-155.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Crino P., Lo Bianco C., Roupha el Y., Colla G., Saccar do F., Para tore A., 2007. Evaluation of rootstock resistance to Fusarium wilt and gummy stem blight and effect on yield and quality of a grafted ‘Inodorus’ melon. Hort. Sci. 42: 521-525.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Daunay M. C., 2008. Eggplant. In: Handbook of Plant Breeding: Vegetables II. J. Prohens and F. Nuez (eds), Springer, New York, USA: 163-220.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Davis A. R., Perk ins-Veazie P., 2005-2006. Rootstock effects on plant vigor and watermelon fruit quality. Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Rep. 28-29: 39-42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Davis A. R., Perk ins-Veazie P., Hassell R., Levi A., King S. R., Zha ng W., 2008a. Grafting effects on vegetable quality. Hort. Sci. 43: 1670-1672.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Davis A. R., Perk ins-Veazie P., Saka ta Y., López- Galar za S., Mar oto J. V., Lee S. G., et al., 2008b. Cucurbit grafting. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 27: 50-74.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Di Gioia F., Serio F., Buttar o D., Ayala O., Santamar ia P., 2010. Influence of rootstock on vegetative growth, fruit yield and quality in ‘Cuore di Bue’, an heirloom tomato. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 85: 477-482.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Di Gioia F., Signore A., Serio F., Santamar ia P., 2013. Grafting improves tomato salinity tolerance through sodium partitioning within the shoot. Hort. Sci. 48: 855-862.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Djidonou D., Gao Z., Zha o X., 2013. Economic analysis of grafted tomato production in sandy soils in northern Florida. HortTechnology 23: 613-621.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Edelstein M., Tyutyunik J., Fallik E., Meir A., Tadmor Y., Cohen R., 2014. Horticultural evaluation of exotic watermelon germplasm as potential rootstocks. Sci. Hort. 165: 196-202.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Flores F. B., Sanch ez-Bel P., Estan M. T., Mar tinez- Rodriguez M. M., Moyano E., Mora les B., et al., 2010. The effectiveness of grafting to improve tomato fruit quality. Sci. Hort. 125: 211-217.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Gao J. H., Liao H. J., 2006. Effect of grafting on watermelon quality. China Cucurbits Veg. 5: 12-14.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Gisbert C., Prohens J., Raigón M. D., Stommel J. R., Nuez F., 2011. Eggplant relatives as sources of variation for developing new rootstocks: Effects of grafting on eggplant yield and fruit apparent quality and composition. Sci. Hort. 128: 14-22.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Hassell R.L., Memmott F., Lierc e D.J., 2008. Grafting methods for watermelon production. HortScience 43: 1677-1679.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Jang Y., Moon J.-H., Lee J.-W., Lee S. G., Kim S. Y., Chun C., 2013. Effects of different rootstocks on fruit quality of grafted pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Korean J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 31: 687-699.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Khah E., 2011. Effect of grafting on growth, performance and yield of aubergine (Solanum melongena L.) in greenhouse and open-field. Intl. J. Plant Prod. 5: 359-366.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. King S.R., Davis A.R., Zha ng X., Crosby K., 2010. Genetics, breeding and selection of rootstocks for Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae. Sci. Hort. 127: 106-111.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Kolayli S., Kara M., Tezca n F., Erim B., Sah in H., Ulusoy S., Aliyazicioglu R., 2010. Comparative study of chemical and biochemical properties of different melon cultivars: standard, hybrid, and grafted melons. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58: 9764-9769.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Kouassi K.C., Koff i-Nevry R., Guillaume L.Y., Yéssé Z.N., Koussémon M., Kab lan T., Atha nase K.K., 2012. Profiles of bioactive compounds of some pepper fruit (Capsicum L.) varieties grown in Côte D’Ivoire. Innovat. Rom. Food Biotechnol. 11: 23-31.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Krumbein A., Schwar z D., 2013. Grafting: A possibility to enhance health-promoting and flavour compounds in tomato fruits of shaded plants? Sci. Hort. 149: 97-107.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Kubota C., 2008. Use of grafted seedlings for vegetable production in North America. Acta Hort. 770: 21-28.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Kubota C., Mcclure M.A., Koka lis-Burelle N., Bausher M.G., Rosskopf E.N., 2008. Vegetable grafting: History, use, and current technology status in North America. Hort. Sci. 43: 1664-1669.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Kyriac ou M.C., Soteriou G.A., 2012. Postharvest change in compositional, visual and textural quality of grafted watermelon cultivars. Acta Hort. 934: 985-991.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Leal-Fernández C., Godoy-Hernández H., Núñez- Colín C.A., Anaya-López J.A., Villalobos-Reyes S., Castellanos J.Z., 2013. Morphological response and fruit yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) grafted onto different commercial rootstocks. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 29: 1-11.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Lee J.M., Oda M., 2003. Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Hort. Rev. 28: 61-124.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Lee J.-M., Kubota C., Tsao S.J., Bie Z., Ech evarr ia P.H., Morra L., Oda M., 2010. Current status of vegetable grafting: diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Sci. Hortic. 127: 93-105.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Liu H.Y., Zhu Z. J., Diao M., Guo Z. P., 2006. Characteristic of the sugar metabolism in leaves and fruits of grafted watermelon during fruit development. Plant Physiol. Commun. 42: 835-840.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Liu N., Yang J.-H., Guo S.-G., Xu Y., Zha ng M.-F., 2013. Genome-wide identification and comparative analysis of conserved and novel microRNAs in grafted watermelon by high-throughput sequencing. PLOS ONE 8: 1-13.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. López-Mar ín J., González A., Pérez-Alfocea F., Egea- Gilab ert C., Fernández J.A., 2013. Grafting is an efficient alternative to shading screens to alleviate thermal stress in greenhouse-grown sweet pepper. Sci. Hort. 149: 39-46.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Louws F.J., Rivar d C.L., Kubota C., 2010. Grafting fruiting vegetables to manage soilborne pathogens, foliar pathogens, arthropods and weeds. Sci. Hort. 127: 127-146.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Mauromica le G., Longo A.M.G., Lo Monac o A., 2011. The effect of organic supplementation of solarized soil on the quality of tomato fruit. Sci. Hort. 129: 189-196.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Meng C., Xu D., Son Y.-J., Kubota C., Lewis M., Tronstad R., 2014. An integrated simulation and AHP approach to vegetable grafting operation design. Comp. Electron. Agric. 102: 73-84.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Miguel A., Mar oto J.V., 2000. Nuevas técnicas en el cultivo de la sandía (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. and Nakai). Consellería de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación de la Generalitat Valenciana y Fundación Caja Rural Valencia. 37-38.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Miguel A., Mar oto J.V., San Bautista A., Baixauli C., Cebolla V., Pascual B., López, S., Guar diola, J. L., 2004. The grafting of triploid watermelon is an advantageous alternative to soil fumigation by methyl bromide for control of Fusarium wilt. Sci. Hort. 103: 9-17.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Moha med F.H., Abd El-Hamed K.E., Elwa n M.W.M., Hussien M.N.E., 2014. Evaluation of different grafting methods and rootstocks in watermelon grown in Egypt. Sci. Hort. 168: 145-150.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Monca da A., Miceli A., Vetra no F., Mineo V., Planeta D., D’anna F., 2013. Effect of grafting on yield and quality of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Sci. Hort. 149: 108-114.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Nicoletto C., Tosini F., Sambo P., 2013. Effect of grafting and ripening conditions on some qualitative traits of ‘Cuore di bue’ tomato fruits. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93: 1397-1403.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Oshiro N., Kuniyoshi K., Naka mura A., Arak i Y., Tamanaha K., Inaf uku Y., 2008. A case of food poisoning due to ingestion of eggplant, Solanum melongena, grafted on devil’s trumpet, Datura metel. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi 49: 376-379 [in Japanese].
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Passam H.C., Stylianoy M., Kotsira s A., 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Performance of eggplant grafted on tomato and eggplant rootstocks. Eur. J. Hort. Sci. 70: 130-134.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Proietti S., Roupha el Y., Colla G., Car dra elli M., De Aga zio M., Zacch ini M., Rea E., Mosca tello S., Battistelli A., 2008. Fruit quality of miniwatermelon as affected by grafting and irrigation regimes. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 88: 1107-1114.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. Ricárdez-Salinas M., Huitrón-Ramírez M.V., Tello- Mar quina J.C., Camach o-Ferr e F., 2010. Planting density for grafted melon as an alternative to methyl bromide use in Mexico. Sci. Hort. 126: 236-241.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. Roupha el Y., Schwar z D., Krumbein A., Colla G., 2010. Impact of grafting on product quality of fruit vegetables. Sci. Hort. 127: 172-179.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. San Bautista A., Calatayud A., Neba uer S.G., Pascual B., Mar oto J.V., López-Galar za S., 2011. Effects of simple and double grafting melon plants on mineral absorption, photosynthesis, biomass and yield. Sci. Hort. 130: 575-580.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. Sánch ez-Rodríguez E., Leyva R., Constán-Aguilar C., Romero L., Ruiz J.M., 2014. How does grafting affect the ionome of cherry tomato plants under water stress? Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 60: 145-155.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Savvas D., Colla G., Roupha e, Y., Schwar z D., 2010. Amelioration of heavy metal and nutrient stress in fruit vegetables by grafting. Sci. Hort. 127: 156-161.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. Savvas D., Savva A., Ntatsi G., Ropokis A., Kara panos I., Krumbein A., Olympios C., 2011. Effects of three commercial rootstocks on mineral nutrition, fruit yield, and quality of salinized tomato. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 174: 154-162.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Schwar z D., Roupha el Y., Colla G., Venema J.H., 2010. Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of vegetables to abiotic stresses: thermal stress, water stress and organic pollutants. Sci. Hort. 127: 162-171.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. Shotorba ni N., Jamei R., Heidar i R., 2013. Antioxidant activities of two sweet pepper Capsicum annuum L. varieties phenolics extracts and the effects of thermal treatment. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 3: 25-34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Soteriou G.A., Kyriac ou M.C., Siomos A.S., Gera sopoulos D., 2014. Evolution of watermelon fruit physicochemical and phytochemical composition during ripening as affected by grafting. Food Chem. 165: 282-289.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  61. Taylor M., Bruton B., Fish W., Roberts W., 2006. Economics of grafted vs conventional watermelon plants. Hort. Sci. 41: 519-520.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  62. Temperini O., Calabr ese N., Temperini A., Roupha el Y., Tesi R., Lenzi A., Car ito A., Colla G., 2013. Grafting artichoke onto cardoon rootstocks: Graft compatibility, yield and Verticillium wilt incidence. Sci. Hort. 149: 22-27.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  63. Tian S.B., Ashraf M.A., Kondo N., Shiigi T., Momin M.A., 2013. Optimization of machine vision for tomato grafting robot. Sensor Lett. 11: 1190-1194.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  64. Tsaba lla A., Atha nasiadis C., Pasentsis K., Ganopoulos I., Nianiou-Obeidat I., Tsaf tar is A., 2013. Molecular studies of inheritable grafting induced changes in pepper (Capsicum annuum) fruit shape. Sci. Hort. 149: 2-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  65. Verzera A., Dima G., Tripodi G., Condurso C., Crinò P., Romano D., Mazzag lia A., Lanza C. M., Restuccia C., Para tore A., 2014. Aroma and sensory quality of honeydew melon fruits (Cucumis melo L. subsp. melo var. inodorus H. Jacq.) in relation to different rootstocks. Sci. Hort. 169: 118-124.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  66. Vinkovic Vrc ek I., Samobor V., Bojic M., Medic- Sar ic M., Vukobra tovic M., Erha tic R., Horvat D., Matotan Z., 2011. The effect of grafting on the antioxidant properties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Span. J. Agric. Res. 9: 844-851.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  67. Wu C.-C., Cha ng Y.-C., Chiu Y.-C., 2007. Study on physiological metabolism of tomato grafted seedlings. J. Taiwan Soc. Hort. Sci. 53: 195-203.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Xu C. Q., Li T. L., Qi H. Y., 2006a. Effects of grafting on development, carbohydrate content, and sucrose metabolizing enzymes activities of muskmelon fruit. Acta Hort. Sinica 33: 773-778.
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. Xu C. Q., Li T. L., Qi H. Y., Wang H., 2006b. Effects of grafting on development and sugar content of muskmelon fruit. J. Shenyang Agric. Univ. 37: 378-381.
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. Zha o X., Guo Y., Huber D.J., Lee J., 2011. Grafting effects on postharvest ripening and quality of 1-methylcyclopropene-treated muskmelon fruit. Sci. Hort. 130: 581-587.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  71. Zhuang Y., Chen L., Sun L., Cao J., 2012. Bioactive characteristics and antioxidant activities of nine peppers. J. Funct. Foods 4: 331-338.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2014-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 79 - 90
Submitted on: Jul 7, 2014
Accepted on: Oct 24, 2014
Published on: Jan 27, 2015
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
grafting methods,
shelf life,
sensory
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science

© 2015 Elazar Fallik, Zoran Ilic, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 26 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)
Previous article
Next article