Table 1.
Regulatory criteria for evaluating the quality of forest crops and natural regeneration at the stage of classification as forested land (Instructions on design, technical acceptance, accounting and quality assessment of forestry objects, 2010)
| Main Tree Species | Type of Forest Site Conditions | Land Category | Quality Class | Polissya | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| age, years | density, thousand trees/ha | average height, m | ||||
| Forest Crops | ||||||
| Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) | A0, A1, B0, B1 | Glades, sands, agricultural lands | 1 | 7 | 6.5 | 1.3 |
| 2 | 5.6 | 1.2 | ||||
| 3 | 5.0 | 0.9 | ||||
| A2, A3 | Glades, burns, clear-cuts without natural regeneration | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 1.4 | |
| 2 | 5.0 | 1.2 | ||||
| 3 | 4.2 | 1.0 | ||||
| B2, B3 | Glades, burns, clear-cuts without natural regeneration | 1 | 6 | 4.5 | 1.6 | |
| 2 | 4.2 | 1.5 | ||||
| 3 | 3.5 | 1.4 | ||||
| A2, A3, B2, B3 | Clear-cuts with sufficient natural regeneration | 1 | 6 | 5.0 | 1.7 | |
| 2 | 4.8 | 1.6 | ||||
| 3 | 4.3 | 1.4 | ||||
| C0, C1 | Glades, clearcuts, agricultural lands | 1 | 7 | 6.0 | 1.4 | |
| 2 | 5.5 | 1.3 | ||||
| 3 | 4.5 | 1.0 | ||||
| C2, C3 | Glades, clearcuts, agricultural lands | 1 | 6 | 4.7 | 1.8 | |
| 2 | 4.5 | 1.7 | ||||
| 3 | 4.0 | 1.5 | ||||
| A4, B4 | Waterlogged lands | 1 | 7 | 3.0 | 1.3 | |
| 2 | 2.8 | 1.1 | ||||
| 3 | 2.3 | 1.0 | ||||
| Natural Forest Regeneration | ||||||
| Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) | A2, A3, B2, B3 | All categories | 1 | 6 | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| 2 | 4.0 | 1.3 | ||||
| 3 | 2.8 | 1.0 | ||||
| C2, C3 | All categories | 1 | 6 | 4.7 | 1.7 | |
| 2 | 4.0 | 1.6 | ||||
| 3 | 2.8 | 1.4 | ||||
| A4, B4 | All categories | 1 | 8 | 3.5 | 1.3 | |
| 2 | 3.0 | 1.1 | ||||
| 3 | 2.5 | 0.9 | ||||
Table 2.
Silvicultural and mensurational indicators of artificial and naturally regenerated stands on permanent sample plots (PSP) in the Eastern Polissya
| No PSP | Type of regeneration | Species composition | Age [years] | Avg H [m] | Avg BH cm] | Density of stocking | Number [hss pcs · ha-1] | Stock [m3 · ha-1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abs [m2 · ha-1] | relative | ||||||||
| 4-Brc | Forest crops Natural regener. | 10PiSy 7BePe3QuRo + PiSy, SaCa | 7 7 | 2.2 1.7 | 2.1 0.3 | 2.57 0.08 | 0.57 0.03 | 6000 7900 | 4.7 0.3 |
| 5-Krk | Forest crops Natural regener. | 10PiSy 6AlGl3BePe1PiSy + QuRo | 8 8 | 2.8 3.7 | 2.5 3.2 | 3.62 1.14 | 0.57 0.25 | 7200 7000 | 11.8 3.4 |
| 1-Nvk | Forest crops | 10PiSy +QuRo | 8 8 | 3.5 1.6 | 4.0 0.5 | 4.84 – | 0.48 – | 3906 208 | 13.9 – |
| 2-Krp | Forest crops Natural regener. | 10Pisy +QuRo 8PiSy1UlLa1AcPl + BePe, QuRo | 8 8 8 | 3.2 1.7 1.9 | 2.9 0.4 1.0 | 0.96 – 0.52 | 0.11 – 0.22 | 1457 257 7527 | 2.5 – 1.4 |
| 9-Uzr | Forest crops Natural regener. | 10PiSy +QuRo 4PiSy3BePe3QuRo + UlLa | 8 8 8 | 2.3 1.5 1.0 | 2.5 0.7 1.6 | 1.70 0.02 0.73 | 0.61 0.01 0.34 | 3425 725 3200 | 3.6 – 1.5 |
| 1-Irz | Forest crops Natural regener. | 10QuRo 5BePe3QuRu2FrEx + SaCa, AcPl | 8 8 | 2.1 2.9 | 1.2 1.9 | 0.44 1.53 | 0.24 0.45 | 4000 8650 | 1.4 4.0 |
| 2-Irz | Forest crops Natural regener. | 10QuRo 5QuRu3PoTr2BePe + FrEx, AcPl | 8 8 | 2.0 2.8 | 2.5 1.5 | 0.56 0.46 | 0.23 0.16 | 3175 3575 | 1.5 1.7 |
| 3-Irz | Forest crops Natural regener. | 10QuRo 4PiSy4QuRu2QuRo+ BePe, AcPl | 8 8 | 1.6 2.1 | 0.5 1.8 | 0.03 0.16 | 0.05 0.10 | 1455 3387 | 0.1 0.4 |
| 5-Oln | Natural regener. | 10PiSy + BePe, PoTr | 6 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 1.12 | 0.34 | 11440 | 0.3 |
| 4-Oln | Natural regener. | 7PiSy3QuRo + AcPl, BePe | 7 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.38 | 0.08 | 3493 | 0.2 |
| 3-Oln | Natural regener. | 7PiSy3BePe + AcPl, QuRo, TiCo | 7 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.35 | 0.23 | 7110 | 1.8 |
| 2-Oln | Natural regener. | 10PiSy + BePe | 7 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.32 | 0.20 | 4802 | 1.2 |
| 1-Oln | Natural regener. | 8PiSy2BePe + QuRo, UlLa, AcPl | 8 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.24 | 0.48 | 9421 | 5.3 |
| 1-Drz | Natural regener. | 3QuRo5AcPl1TiCo1PiSy+ BePe, SaCa | 7 | 1.3 | – | – | – | 23980 | – |
1 PiSy – Pinus sylvestriis, BePe – Betula pendula, QuRo – Quercus robur, SaCa – Salix caprea, AlGl –Alnus glutinosa, UlLa – Ulnus laevis, AcPl – Acer platanoides, FrEx – Fraxinus exelsior, PoTr – Populus tremula, QuRu – Quercus rubra, TiCo – Tilia cordata, Brc – Bretske Forestry, Krk – Koriukivske Forestry, Nvk – Nevklianske Forestry, Krp – Koropske Forestry, Uzr – Uzruivske Forestry, Irz – Irzhavetske Forestry, Oln – Olinske Forestry, Drz – Druzhbivske Forestry.
Table 3.
List of agrotechnical operations for natural regeneration and forest crops during the first three years
| Years | Measures to promote natural regeneration | Creation of a forest crops |
|---|---|---|
| First |
|
|
| Second |
|
|
| Third |
|
|
Table 4.
Calculating the gross domestic product deflator by cumulative total in Ukraine (2015–2024)
| Indicator | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDP deflator | 117.1 | 122.1 | 115.4 | 108.2 | 110.3 | 124.8 | 134.9 | 119.9 | 112.3 |
| GDP deflator by cumulative total | 117.1 | 142.9 | 164.9 | 178.4 | 196.8 | 245.6 | 331.3 | 397.2 | 446.1 |
Table 5.
The volume of forest regeneration by state forestry enterprises
| Years | Area of reforestation, ha | Area of afforestation, ha | Total, ha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| forest crops | natural regeneration | total | forest crops | natural regeneration | total | ||
| 2012 | 3291 | 921 | 4212 | 1124 | 65 | 1189 | 5401 |
| 2013 | 2661 | 351 | 3012 | 289 | – | 289 | 3301 |
| 2019 | 2349 | 429 | 2778 | 90 | – | 90 | 2868 |
| 2023 | 1272 | 167 | 1439 | 35 | – | 35 | 1474 |

Figure 1.
Proportion of forest regeneration across forest site condition types, %
Table 6.
Trends in forest crops areas by tree species composition
| Years | Area of artificial reforestation by dominant tree species, ha | Area of artificial afforestation by dominant tree species, ha | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PiSy | QuRo | Algl | others | PiSy | QuRo | AlgI | Others | |
| 2012 | 2739.0 | 346.0 | 17.3 | 189.1 | 868.7 | 123.4 | 45.8 | 86.1 |
| 2013 | 2309.9 | 215.4 | 50.1 | 85.6 | 250.6 | – | 24.0 | 14.4 |
| 2019 | 2062.1 | 184.2 | 59.2 | 43.5 | 80.0 | – | – | 10.0 |
| 2023 | 1154.5 | 85.0 | 12.2 | 20.3 | 35.0 | – | – | 35.0 |

Figure 2.
Current mean annual height increment (cm) of pedunculate oak (Q. robur) trees in stands established in 2012 using container-grown seedlings (A), three-year-old bare-root seedlings (B), and direct acorn sowing (C)