Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Trends in forest crops areas by tree species composition
| Years | Area of artificial reforestation by dominant tree species, ha | Area of artificial afforestation by dominant tree species, ha | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PiSy | QuRo | Algl | others | PiSy | QuRo | AlgI | Others | |
| 2012 | 2739.0 | 346.0 | 17.3 | 189.1 | 868.7 | 123.4 | 45.8 | 86.1 |
| 2013 | 2309.9 | 215.4 | 50.1 | 85.6 | 250.6 | – | 24.0 | 14.4 |
| 2019 | 2062.1 | 184.2 | 59.2 | 43.5 | 80.0 | – | – | 10.0 |
| 2023 | 1154.5 | 85.0 | 12.2 | 20.3 | 35.0 | – | – | 35.0 |
Calculating the gross domestic product deflator by cumulative total in Ukraine (2015–2024)
| Indicator | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDP deflator | 117.1 | 122.1 | 115.4 | 108.2 | 110.3 | 124.8 | 134.9 | 119.9 | 112.3 |
| GDP deflator by cumulative total | 117.1 | 142.9 | 164.9 | 178.4 | 196.8 | 245.6 | 331.3 | 397.2 | 446.1 |
Silvicultural and mensurational indicators of artificial and naturally regenerated stands on permanent sample plots (PSP) in the Eastern Polissya
| No PSP | Type of regeneration | Species composition | Age [years] | Avg H [m] | Avg BH cm] | Density of stocking | Number [hss pcs · ha-1] | Stock [m3 · ha-1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abs [m2 · ha-1] | relative | ||||||||
| 4-Brc | Forest crops Natural regener. | 10PiSy | 7 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.57 | 0.57 | 6000 | 4.7 |
| 5-Krk | Forest crops Natural regener. | 10PiSy | 8 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 3.62 | 0.57 | 7200 | 11.8 |
| 1-Nvk | Forest crops | 10PiSy | 8 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.84 | 0.48 | 3906 | 13.9 |
| 2-Krp | Forest crops | 10Pisy | 8 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 0.96 | 0.11 | 1457 | 2.5 |
| 9-Uzr | Forest crops | 10PiSy | 8 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 1.70 | 0.61 | 3425 | 3.6 |
| 1-Irz | Forest crops Natural regener. | 10QuRo | 8 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.44 | 0.24 | 4000 | 1.4 |
| 2-Irz | Forest crops Natural regener. | 10QuRo | 8 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0.56 | 0.23 | 3175 | 1.5 |
| 3-Irz | Forest crops Natural regener. | 10QuRo | 8 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 1455 | 0.1 |
| 5-Oln | Natural regener. | 10PiSy + BePe, PoTr | 6 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 1.12 | 0.34 | 11440 | 0.3 |
| 4-Oln | Natural regener. | 7PiSy3QuRo + AcPl, BePe | 7 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.38 | 0.08 | 3493 | 0.2 |
| 3-Oln | Natural regener. | 7PiSy3BePe + AcPl, QuRo, TiCo | 7 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.35 | 0.23 | 7110 | 1.8 |
| 2-Oln | Natural regener. | 10PiSy + BePe | 7 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.32 | 0.20 | 4802 | 1.2 |
| 1-Oln | Natural regener. | 8PiSy2BePe + QuRo, UlLa, AcPl | 8 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.24 | 0.48 | 9421 | 5.3 |
| 1-Drz | Natural regener. | 3QuRo5AcPl1TiCo1PiSy+ BePe, SaCa | 7 | 1.3 | – | – | – | 23980 | – |
Regulatory criteria for evaluating the quality of forest crops and natural regeneration at the stage of classification as forested land (Instructions on design, technical acceptance, accounting and quality assessment of forestry objects, 2010)
| Main Tree Species | Type of Forest Site Conditions | Land Category | Quality Class | Polissya | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| age, years | density, thousand trees/ha | average height, m | ||||
| Forest Crops | ||||||
| Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) | A0, A1, B0, B1 | Glades, sands, agricultural lands | 1 | 7 | 6.5 | 1.3 |
| 2 | 5.6 | 1.2 | ||||
| 3 | 5.0 | 0.9 | ||||
| A2, A3 | Glades, burns, clear-cuts without natural regeneration | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 1.4 | |
| 2 | 5.0 | 1.2 | ||||
| 3 | 4.2 | 1.0 | ||||
| B2, B3 | Glades, burns, clear-cuts without natural regeneration | 1 | 6 | 4.5 | 1.6 | |
| 2 | 4.2 | 1.5 | ||||
| 3 | 3.5 | 1.4 | ||||
| A2, A3, B2, B3 | Clear-cuts with sufficient natural regeneration | 1 | 6 | 5.0 | 1.7 | |
| 2 | 4.8 | 1.6 | ||||
| 3 | 4.3 | 1.4 | ||||
| C0, C1 | Glades, clearcuts, agricultural lands | 1 | 7 | 6.0 | 1.4 | |
| 2 | 5.5 | 1.3 | ||||
| 3 | 4.5 | 1.0 | ||||
| C2, C3 | Glades, clearcuts, agricultural lands | 1 | 6 | 4.7 | 1.8 | |
| 2 | 4.5 | 1.7 | ||||
| 3 | 4.0 | 1.5 | ||||
| A4, B4 | Waterlogged lands | 1 | 7 | 3.0 | 1.3 | |
| 2 | 2.8 | 1.1 | ||||
| 3 | 2.3 | 1.0 | ||||
| Natural Forest Regeneration | ||||||
| Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) | A2, A3, B2, B3 | All categories | 1 | 6 | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| 2 | 4.0 | 1.3 | ||||
| 3 | 2.8 | 1.0 | ||||
| C2, C3 | All categories | 1 | 6 | 4.7 | 1.7 | |
| 2 | 4.0 | 1.6 | ||||
| 3 | 2.8 | 1.4 | ||||
| A4, B4 | All categories | 1 | 8 | 3.5 | 1.3 | |
| 2 | 3.0 | 1.1 | ||||
| 3 | 2.5 | 0.9 | ||||
The volume of forest regeneration by state forestry enterprises
| Years | Area of reforestation, ha | Area of afforestation, ha | Total, ha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| forest crops | natural regeneration | total | forest crops | natural regeneration | total | ||
| 2012 | 3291 | 921 | 4212 | 1124 | 65 | 1189 | 5401 |
| 2013 | 2661 | 351 | 3012 | 289 | – | 289 | 3301 |
| 2019 | 2349 | 429 | 2778 | 90 | – | 90 | 2868 |
| 2023 | 1272 | 167 | 1439 | 35 | – | 35 | 1474 |
List of agrotechnical operations for natural regeneration and forest crops during the first three years
| Years | Measures to promote natural regeneration | Creation of a forest crops |
|---|---|---|
| First |
|
|
| Second |
|
|
| Third |
|
|