Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Productivity of medieval artificial oak stands
| Quarter | Allotment | Area, ha | Age, years | Composition of the plantation | Medium | Growth class | Fullness | Stock of stemwood, m3·ha−1 | Stock of stemwood, m3·ha−1 resulted in fullness of 0.7 | Stock of stemof wood, at a fullness of 0.7 resulted to 45 years of age, m3·ha−1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N, m | D1,3, cm | |||||||||||
| 41–50 years | ||||||||||||
| Cultivations of common oak created using the first agrotechnological method | ||||||||||||
| 2 | 4 | 1.5 | 45 | 4Co2Cash2Ro1Chor1Norm + Pr | 16 | 16 | I | 0.8 | 170 | 148.75 | 148.75 | |
| 2 | 6 | 1.6 | 45 | 3Co2Cash3Ro2 Norm + Chor + Pr | 17 | 20 | I | 0.9 | 200 | 155.56 | 155.56 | |
| 6 | 2 | 5.9 | 49 | 8Co1Sll1Norm + Chor | 17 | 20 | I | 0.9 | 220 | 171.11 | 157.14 | |
| 10 | 10 | 6.2 | 46 | 5Co2Cash1Sll1Norm1Chor | 16 | 16 | I | 0.8 | 170 | 148.75 | 145.52 | |
| LSD0.5 | 2.12 | 1.82 | 2.15 | 2.04 | ||||||||
| Cultivations of common oak using the second agrotechnological method | ||||||||||||
| 11 | 4 | 2.7 | 46 | 4Co3Chor2Cash1Norm + Pr + Sb | 17 | 14 | I | 0.9 | 170 | 132.22 | 129.35 | |
| 15 | 3 | 3.2 | 48 | 3Co4 Chor1Sll1Norm1Cash + Pr + As | 19 | 20 | Ia | 0.9 | 200 | 155.56 | 145.84 | |
| 15 | 15 | 1.4 | 48 | 3Co4 Chor1Sll1Norm1Cash + Pr + As | 19 | 20 | Ia | 0.9 | 200 | 155.56 | 145.84 | |
| Cultivations of common oak using the third agrotechnological method | ||||||||||||
| 16 | 1 | 2.8 | 42 | 3Co1Ro3 Chor 2As1Cash + Norm + Sll + Pr | 12 | 12 | II | 0.8 | 90 | 78.75 | 84.38 | |
| 16 | 10 | 1.7 | 42 | 3Co1Ro3 Chor2As1Cash + Norm + Sll + Hs | 12 | 12 | II | 0.8 | 90 | 78.75 | 84.38 | |
| LSD0.5 | 2.03 | 1.91 | 2.14 | 2.14 | ||||||||
| Σ | 27.0 | |||||||||||