Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Photoautotrophic microclonal propagation of raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) variety Delniwa Cover

Photoautotrophic microclonal propagation of raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) variety Delniwa

Open Access
|Sep 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Cultivation of raspberry in vitro in containers with a volume of 200 ml
Cultivation of raspberry in vitro in containers with a volume of 200 ml

Figure 2.

Microclimate maintenance scheme for photoautotrophic nutrition
Microclimate maintenance scheme for photoautotrophic nutrition

Figure 3.

The influence of different concentrations of 6-benzylaminopurine (a) and kinetin (b) on the coefficient of multiplication of raspberries in vitro
The influence of different concentrations of 6-benzylaminopurine (a) and kinetin (b) on the coefficient of multiplication of raspberries in vitro

Figure 4.

The determining effect of cytokinins on the offspring of donors raised on substances with cytokinin activity in quantities of 1 mg/l, where 1 – kinetin; 2 – BAP
The determining effect of cytokinins on the offspring of donors raised on substances with cytokinin activity in quantities of 1 mg/l, where 1 – kinetin; 2 – BAP

Figure 5.

Negative consequences of excessive watering on peat substrates
Negative consequences of excessive watering on peat substrates

Figure 6.

Use of Drosera to control insect population in bioreactors of photoautotrophic microclonal propagation
Use of Drosera to control insect population in bioreactors of photoautotrophic microclonal propagation

Figure 7.

The second generation of cuttings by photoautotrophic microclonal reproduction
The second generation of cuttings by photoautotrophic microclonal reproduction

Figure 8.

State of the regenerants on the 21st day after leaving from the bioreactor
State of the regenerants on the 21st day after leaving from the bioreactor

Figure 9.

Raspberry leaf polymorphism due to the loss of juvenility: 1 – adapted plants in vitro (the first generation, grown ex vitro); 2 – second generation ex vitro; 3 – third generation ex vitro
Raspberry leaf polymorphism due to the loss of juvenility: 1 – adapted plants in vitro (the first generation, grown ex vitro); 2 – second generation ex vitro; 3 – third generation ex vitro

Figure 10.

The state of the root system in donors of apical cuttings
The state of the root system in donors of apical cuttings

Figure 11.

The influence of the intensity of lighting on the state of the photoassimilating surface of raspberry cuttings in vivo
The influence of the intensity of lighting on the state of the photoassimilating surface of raspberry cuttings in vivo

Figure 12.

Symptoms of magnesium deficiency before (1, 2) and after feeding (3, 4)
Symptoms of magnesium deficiency before (1, 2) and after feeding (3, 4)

Figure 13.

The condition of raspberry cuttings in vivo in a bioreactor
The condition of raspberry cuttings in vivo in a bioreactor

Duration of plant regeneration in vitro from different types of primary explants, days

Type of explantMedium
MSM1MK
Meristem63 ± 7.257 ± 8.161 ± 7.0
Bud39 ± 3.933 ± 4.830 ± 4.1
Shoot stem34 ± 4.732 ± 4.230 ± 3.8

Peculiarities of adaptation of regenerants depending on the basis of the substrate

IndicatorThe basis of the substrate
PeatPerlite
Survival, %73.3 ± 6.089.3 ± 6.3
Height of regenerants on the 30th day, mm76.5 ± 6.067.1 ± 5.3
Inhabitation by insects, pieces/container23.1 ± 6.44.0 ± 1.7

The influence of the nutrient medium on the rate of raspberry multiplication in vitro (BAP 1_0 mg/l, fifth passage)

IndicatorMedium
MSMKM1
Multiplication coefficient4.7 ± 0.32.1 ± 0.35.6 ± 0.3
Regeneration period, days32.0 ± 4.449.0 ± 4.924.0 ± 3.2

Effectiveness of controlling the quantity of insects in humid chambers

Number of insectsControlStandardInsectivorous plants
DroseraDionaeaNepenthes
Peat substrate
Beginning9±3.210±3.09±2.911±4.28±2.8
End27±4.97±1.83±0.919±4.023±5.7
Perlite substrate
Beginning3±0.93±0.64±0.63±0.44±1.1
End11±2.85±1.21±0.29±1.98±2.9

The influence of the type of primary explants on the number of transfers and the yield of regenerants in vitro, medium M1

Type of explantNumber of transfers, piecesYield of regenerants from primary explants, %
Meristem2.7±0.42.3±1.1
Bud1.9±0.318.4±3.6
Shoot stem1.5±0.354.3±4.1

The composition of nutrient media

ComponentQuantity, mg/l
MSM1MK
NH4NO31650.001250417.00
KNO31900.001100367.00
MgSO4 × 7H2O370.00770257.00
KH2PO4170.00970324.00
Ca(NO3)2 × 4H2O440293.00
CaCl2 × 2H2O440.00
FeSO4 × 7H2O27.8018.54
Na2MoO4 × 2H2O37.3024.70
Ferrilene 4.8 Orto–Orto183.4
H3BO36.2
MnSO4 × H2O22.3
CoCl2 × 6H2O0.025
CuSO4 × H2O0.025
ZnSO4 × 7H2O8.6
Na2MoO4 × 2H2O0.25
KJ0.83
Thiamine-HCl1.6
Pyridoxine-HCl0.5
Vitamin C2.0
Nicotinic acid1.0
Mesoinosit100
Glycine0.5
Adenine0.2
Saccharose30,000
Agar7,000
pH 5.6

The influence of cultivation of donor plants during five passages on media with different concentrations of cytokinins on the rhizogenesis of regenerants

IndicatorCytokinin, mg/l
BAP 0.25BAP 1.0Kinetin 0.25Kinetin 1.0
Beginning of root formation, days19.0 ± 3.224.0 ± 3.713.0 ± 2.416.0 ± 2.9
The length of the root system on the 30th day of cultivation, mm9.3 ± 3.04.2 ± 0.916.4 ± 3.114.1 ± 3.9
The number of roots on the 30th day of cultivation9.2 ± 2.87.4 ± 2.27.3 ± 2.45.1 ± 1.8

The length of the raspberry root system ex vitro, mm

ConditionsCultivation day
7142130
Wet chamber3±1.211±5.459±8.8
Bioreactor27±3.268±7.0103±9.1124±11.0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2024-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2199-5907 | Journal ISSN: 0071-6677
Language: English
Page range: 183 - 194
Submitted on: Jan 23, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 15, 2024
Published on: Sep 12, 2024
Published by: Forest Research Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Vyacheslav Matskevych, Vasyl Yukhnovskyi, Larysa Filipova, Natalia Kravchenko, Olga Tupchii, Yurii Matskevych, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.