Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of the genetic diversity and population structures of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) stands in Poland based on simple sequence repeat markers Cover

Analysis of the genetic diversity and population structures of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) stands in Poland based on simple sequence repeat markers

Open Access
|Dec 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Forest stands where plant material was collected for genetic analyses. The origin of the plant material is indicated in brackets

No.Forestry divisionArea (ha)Tree age (years)Geographical coordinates
1Cybinka (PL)1.0572
  • N 52 7 23.7

  • E 14 56 43.5

2Krosno 232 (PL)3.1892
  • N 52 8 24.1

  • E 14 55 14.3

3Krosno 90 (PL)1.1439
  • N 52 5 40.2

  • E 14 58 13.7

4Mieszkowice (PL)1.3150
  • N 52 51 31.5

  • E 14 11 40.7

5Pińczów (PL)3.1938
  • N 50 15 53.0

  • E 20 42 7.2

6Strzelce (PL)1.3640
  • N 50 29 37.7

  • E 18 2 54.2

7Wołów (PL)2.8646N 51 25 12.5
8Oborniki Śląskie (HU)1.0915
  • N 51 22 39.5

  • E 16 53 23.7

9Buckow (DE)1.1058N 52 33 32.8
Table 2.

Nuclear microsatellite loci used in the analysis of genetic diversity of R. pseudoacacia

LocusRepeatPrimer sequence (5′–3′)Ta. (°C)Size range (bp)No. of allelesGenBank NCBI accession no.
Rops15(CT)20GCCCATTTTCAAGAATCCATATATTGG54112–25443AB120731
TCATCCTTGTTTTGGACAATC
Rops16(CT)13AACCCTAAAAGCCTCGTTATC56195–22315AB120732
TGGCATTTTTTGGAAGACACC
Rops18(AC)8AGATAAGATCAAGTGCAAGAGTGTAAG54135–21913AB120733
TAATCCTCGAGGGAACAATAC
Table 3.

The genetic diversity indexes for each locus

LocusNaHouHeFIS
Rops15200.9680.716−0.378
Rops16190.6770.555−0.252
Rops1860.0510.0630.121

[i] Na – number of alleles; Ho – observed heterozygosity; uHe – unbiased genetic diversity; FIS – inbreeding coefficient.

Table 4.

Genetic diversity of populations of R. pseudoacacia revealed by microsatellite loci

Forest standsHoHeHF
Cybinka0.4450.2910.295−0.310
Krosno2320.6000.4690.4730.076
Krosno900.6200.3530.358−0.757
Miechów0.670.3730.380−0.820
Pińczów0.5520.6320.6630.068
Strzelce0.4720.4460.453−0.060
Wołów0.6230.4560.472−0.306
Oborniki Śl.0.440.490.5010.145
Buckow0.670.400.406−0.663
Total0.560.4330.445−0.260

[i] He – average expected heterozygosity; H – heterozygosity; Ho – observed heterozygosity; F – fixation index

Figure 1.

Allelic patterns for R. pseudoacacia populations. Na – number of alleles per locus, Ne – number of effective alleles, I – Shannon's information index

Table 5.

The mean FIS and FIT values for population of R. pseudoacacia

F-statisticsValueP
FST0.4120.001
FIS−0.1700.649
FIT0.2460.001
Nm0.771
Table. 6

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of genetic diversity of R. pseudoacacia populations

SourcedfSSMSEst. var.%
Among pops888.16311.0200.33537
Within pops275157.4880.5730.57363
Total283245.6510.908100

[i] df – degrees of freedom; SS – sum of squares; MS – mean square; est. var. – estimated variance.

Figure 2.

Relationships among the populations of Robinia pseudoacacia. A principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on pairwise genetic distance estimates for all populations. Percentages of total variance explained by coordinates 1 and 2 accounting for 68.99 and 14.23%, respectively

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2023-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2199-5907 | Journal ISSN: 0071-6677
Language: English
Page range: 187 - 198
Submitted on: Jun 28, 2023
Accepted on: Oct 26, 2023
Published on: Dec 12, 2023
Published by: Forest Research Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2023 Iwona Szyp-Borowska, Anna Zawadzka, Tomasz Wojda, Marcin Klisz, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.