Table 1
Amount of damage in different thinning treatments (Myszyniec, July 2002)
| Treatment | N | G | H | D | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pcs ha−1 | m2 ha−1 | % | m | cm | % | |
| O1 | 470 | 14.189 | 50.1 | 19.4 | 19.7 | 102.0 |
| K | 384 | 9.099 | 25.5 | 19.9 | 20.0 | 105.9 |
| LD | 800 | 22.487 | 71.2 | 19.4 | 18.1 | 95.6 |
| LS | 518 | 12.428 | 46.4 | 18.7 | 17.5 | 95.3 |
| SD | 643 | 17.033 | 53.0 | 20.0 | 19.7 | 100.7 |
| SS | 575 | 16.247 | 55.3 | 18.6 | 17.4 | 96.3 |
1 Plots out of the experiment; other treatments described in the section ‘Materials and Methods’.
N – number of damaged trees, G – basal area of damaged trees, G % – basal area of damaged trees in relation to total basal area before windstorm, H – mean height of damaged trees, D – mean diameter of damaged trees, D % – mean diameter of damaged trees in relation to mean diameter of total stand.
Figure 1
Number of damaged trees (A – Nd) and their basal area (B – Gd) in different thinning treatments (Myszyniec)
Table 2
Amount of damage in different blocks of experiment (Myszyniec, July 2002)
| Block | N | G | H | D | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pcs ha−1 | m2 ha−1 | % | m | cm | % | |
| 1 | 1104 | 27.916 | 96.4 | 19.4 | 18.1 | 99.9 |
| 2 | 730 | 17.849 | 58.9 | 18.1 | 17.7 | 98.9 |
| 3 | 194 | 5.751 | 20.6 | 19.5 | 20.7 | 106.1 |
| 4 | 680 | 21.631 | 62.5 | 20.8 | 19.5 | 97.2 |
| 5 | 80 | 1.861 | 5.7 | 19.2 | 17.6 | 95.6 |
[i] N – number of damaged trees, G – basal area of damaged trees, G % – basal area of damaged trees in relation to total basal area before windstorm, H – mean height of damaged trees, D – mean diameter of damaged trees, D % – mean diameter of damaged trees in relation to mean diameter of total stand.
Figure 2
Number of damaged trees (A – Nd) and their basal area (B – Gd) in different blocks of the experiment (Myszyniec)
Table 3
Amount of damage dependent on time of last thinning (Myszyniec, July 2002)
| Thinning 2001/2002 | N | G | H | D | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pcs ha−1 | m2 ha−1 | % | m | cm | % | |
| Yes | 1043 | 26,040 | 91.4 | 18.8 | 17.9 | 99.6 |
| No | 329 | 9.807 | 30.7 | 19.7 | 19.1 | 99.6 |
[i] N – number of damaged trees, G – basal area of damaged trees, G % – basal area of damaged trees in relation to total basal area before windstorm, H – mean height of damaged trees, D – mean diameter of damaged trees, D % – mean diameter of damaged trees in relation to mean diameter of total stand.
Table 4
Amount of damage in different thinning treatments (Ostrów Mazowiecka, July 2011)
| Treatment | N | G | H | D | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pcs ha−1 | m2 ha−1 | % | m | cm | % | |
| K | 58 | 1.113 | 3.1 | 19.9 | 15.3 | 76.1 |
| LD | 60 | 1.862 | 5.7 | 22.0 | 19.7 | 89.5 |
| LS | 40 | 1.400 | 4.8 | 21.8 | 21.9 | 96.2 |
| SD | 30 | 0.737 | 2.3 | 20.0 | 17.5 | 85.1 |
| SS | 60 | 1.349 | 4.7 | 20.9 | 19.7 | 89.1 |
[i] N – number of damaged trees, G – basal area of damaged trees, G % – basal area of damaged trees in relation to total basal area before windstorm, H – mean height of damaged trees, D – mean diameter of damaged trees, D % – mean diameter of damaged trees in relation to mean diameter of total stand.
Figure 3
Number of damaged trees (A – Nd) and their basal area (B – Gd) in different thinning treatments (Ostrów Mazowiecka)
Table 5
Amount of damage in different blocks of the experiment (Ostrów Mazowiecka, July 2011)
| Block | N | G | H | D | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pcs ha−1 | m2 ha−1 | % | m | cm | % | |
| 1 | 68 | 1.719 | 5.5 | 19.5 | 16.2 | 83.5 |
| 2 | 32 | 0.778 | 2.4 | 21.1 | 18.5 | 83.9 |
| 3 | 28 | 1.003 | 3.0 | 23.2 | 21.8 | 85.9 |
| 4 | 42 | 1.048 | 3.4 | 21.0 | 18.9 | 86.7 |
| 5 | 80 | 1.914 | 6.1 | 20.0 | 18.8 | 89.2 |
[i] N – number of damaged trees, G – basal area of damaged trees, G % – basal area of damaged trees in relation to total basal area before windstorm, H – mean height of damaged trees, D – mean diameter of damaged trees, D % – mean diameter of damaged trees in relation to mean diameter of total stand.
Figure 4
Number of damaged trees (A – Nd) and their basal area (B – Gd) in different blocks of the experiment (Ostrów Mazowiecka)