Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Thyroid profile in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: prognostic role of thyrotropin-releasing hormone Cover

Thyroid profile in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: prognostic role of thyrotropin-releasing hormone

Open Access
|Nov 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Relation of the type of initial thyroid profile to overall survival in ALL by Kaplan–Meier assessment.
Relation of the type of initial thyroid profile to overall survival in ALL by Kaplan–Meier assessment.

Figure 2:

Relation of the type of post-induction thyroid profile to overall survival in ALL by Kaplan–Meier assessment.
Relation of the type of post-induction thyroid profile to overall survival in ALL by Kaplan–Meier assessment.

Thyroid function tests of the study population before and after chemotherapy induction_

InitialPost-chemotp

Mean ± SDMean ± SD
T32.94 ± 0.793.25 ± 0.803.730.001
T41.35 ± 0.401.54 ±0.392.870.007
TSH1.64 ± 1.221.94 ± 1.092.170.035
TRH124.40 ± 96.03338.16 ± 167.087.86< 0.001

Correlations between initial thyroid function tests and different factors_

Initial T3Initial T4Initial TSHInitial TRH

rprprprp
Age−0.070.6480.190.211−0.260.0850.0010.995
Comorbidity0.230.1290.010.9480.050.7440.230.129
TLC0.0010.9950.180.5130.110.4720.080.601
Hb0.100.5130.070.6480.050.7440.070.648
Platelets0.170.2640.100.5130.030.8450.010.948
Risk stratification0.010.9480.260.0850.170.2640.030.845
Diagnosis0.190.2110.270.0730.200.1880.290.053
Initial bone marrow aspirate−0.140.359−0.290.053−0.190.211−0.010.948
Initial flow−0.210.166−0.200.188−0.290.053−0.080.601
Karyotyping−0.170.2640.020.896−0.140.3590.070.648
Cytogenetics−0.230.129−0.0010.995−0.180.513−0.070.648
Overall survival−0.0010.995−0.040.794−0.090.557−0.300.045
Disease status−0.120.432−0.130.395−0.160.294−0.210.166
Disease-free survival−0.040.794−0.010.948−0.330.027−0.300.045
Post-chemotherapy MRD−0.160.294−0.100.513−0.170.264−0.110.472
Post-chemotherapy aspirate−0.070.648−0.110.472−0.040.794−0.040.794

Post-induction chemotherapy thyroid function tests of patients receiving HCVAD Vs those receiving CALGB_

HCVADCALGBtp

Mean ± SDMean ± SD
T33.22 ± 0.853.53 ± 0.521.110.054
T41.59 ± 0.361.50 ± 0.320.670.511
TSH1.69 ± 1.192.31 ± 1.041.490.146
TRH344.45 ± 178.86317.01 ± 158.930.420.674

Demographic data of the study population_

Baseline clinical characteristicsPatient group (N = 44)
Age (years), mean (SD), (range)29.56 13.91, (15–60)
< 39 years84% (37/44)
> 40 years16% (7/44)
Gender
Male84% (37/44)
Female16% (7/44)
Type of ALL
B-ALL77.2% (34/44)
T-ALL22.7% (10/44)
Karyotyping
Normal96% (42/44)
Abnormal4% (2/44)
Cytogenetics
Philadelphia chromosome (+)18.18% (8/44)
Philadelphia chromosome (−)77.27% (34/44)
Others (7q31/7q22& monosomy 7 negative, Del7q31+11 positive)4% (2/44)
Comorbidities
NonComorbid (DM, HTN, CKD)94% (41/44)
6% (3/44)
Chemotherapy regimen
HCVAD57% (25/44)
CALGB34% (15/44)
Total 155% (2/44)
Others4% (2/44)
Minimal residual disease (MRD)0.009 (0.001–0.06)
Positive (>0.01 %)27% (12/44)
Negative (<0.01 %)54% (24/44)
Not available as patient died in induction19% (8/44)
Disease status after induction
Remission59% (26/44)
Relapsed22 % (10/44)
Patient died during induction18% (8/44)
6 months survival rate
Alive70% (31/44)
Dead30% (13/44)
Disease-free survival (months),(SD), range7.85 (6.46), 2–24
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fco-2024-0018 | Journal eISSN: 1792-362X | Journal ISSN: 1792-345X
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 19, 2024
|
Accepted on: Feb 5, 2025
|
Published on: Nov 10, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Hebatullah Magdy Mahmoud Fares, Neviene Nabil Moustafa, Nayera Ibrahim Abdel Murdy, Basma Saeid Mansour Ali, Nahed Moawad Ibrahim Rakha, published by Helenic Society of Medical Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT