Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Correlation of geriatric assessment and outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients Cover

Correlation of geriatric assessment and outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients

Open Access
|Aug 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

G8 score.
G8 score.

Figure 2:

GAH score.
GAH score.

Figure 3:

Cumulative survival curve in frail and non-frail patients using G8 score.
Cumulative survival curve in frail and non-frail patients using G8 score.

Figure (4):

Cumulative survival curve in frail and non-frail patients using GAH score.
Cumulative survival curve in frail and non-frail patients using GAH score.

Comparison between frail and non-frail patient regarding survival at one month, three and six months_

NF No. (%) 
Test valueP-value
F

No. (%)
Re-evaluation after one monthCR7 (43.8%)0 (0.0%)15.2090.002
PR5 (31.2%)2 (12.5%)
R4 (25.0%)9 (56.2%)
Died0 (0.0%)5 (31.2%)
Re-evaluation after 3 monthsAlive16 (100.0%)7 (43.8%)12.522<0.001
Died0 (0.0%)9 (56.2%)
Re-evaluation after 6 monthsAlive12 (75.0%)3 (18.8%)10.1650.001
Died4 (25.0%)13 (81.2%)

Comparison between frail and non-frail patient regarding incidence of complications, ECOG performance and hospitalization_

Total no. = 32Total NF 
Test valueP-value
F

No. = 16No. = 16
ComplicationsNF21 (65.6%)10 (62.5%)11 (68.8%)0.139*0.710
Pneumonia8 (25.0%)6 (37.5%)2 (12.5%)2.667*0.102
Abscess7 (21.9%)4 (25.0%)3 (18.8%)0.183*0.669
ECOG scoreSepsis7 (21.9%)2 (12.5%)5 (31.2%)1.646*0.200
Median (IQR)1 (0 – 2)0 (0 – 1)2 (2 – 3)−4.589≠<0.001
Range0 – 40 – 11 – 4
HospitalizationMedian (IQR)22.5 (17 – 31.5)27.5 (21.5 – 33)17.5 (11 – 23)−2.603≠0.009
Range5 – 6015 – 605 – 50

Treatment protocols used in all patients_

Treatment ProtocolTotalPercentageFNF
2+51031.25%46
2+713.12%01
3+7721.87%07
Oral Etoposide13.12%10
PETHEMA Induction412.5%31
S/C Cytarabine618.75%51
Supportive Treatment39.37%30

Comparison between frail and non-frail patient regarding demographic data, comorbidities and risk category_

No. = 32TotalNFFTest valueP-valueSig.

No. = 16No. = 16
AgeMean ± SD64.94 ± 6.1462.56 ± 3.9367.31 ± 7.1−2.566•0.016S
Range60 – 8660 – 7560 – 86
DMNo25 (78.1%)15 (93.8%)10 (62.5%)4.571*0.033S
Yes7 (21.9%)1 (6.2%)6 (37.5%)
HTNNo13 (40.6%)10 (62.5%)3 (18.8%)6.348*0.012S
Yes19 (59.4%)6 (37.5%)13 (81.2%)
Viral hepatitisNo29 (90.6%)14 (87.5%)15 (93.8%)0.368*0.544NS
Yes3 (9.4%)2 (12.5%)1 (6.3%)
Favorable5 (17.2%)1 (6.2%)4 (30.8%)
CytogeneticsIntermediate23 (79.3%)15 (93.8%)8 (61.5%)4.670*0.097NS
Adverse1 (3.4%)0 (0.0%)1 (7.7%)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fco-2023-0026 | Journal eISSN: 1792-362X | Journal ISSN: 1792-345X
Language: English
Page range: 67 - 73
Submitted on: Sep 30, 2023
|
Accepted on: Jan 1, 2024
|
Published on: Aug 21, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Mostafa Kamal El Razzaz, Tamer Mohamed Ahmed, Hebatullah Magdy, Ramadan Eid Dawod, Basma Saeid Mansour, published by Helenic Society of Medical Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.