Exploring Tunisian Primary School Teachers’ Perceptions of ChatGPT Integration in Education: Insights from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
By: Bechir Fridhi
References
- Ahmed, H., Azhar, K. A. (2022). Acceptance of artificial intelligence-based chatbots in education: A technology acceptance model approach. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 4855–4874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10778-9
- Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., De Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI& Society, 35(3), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w
- Baidoo-Anu, D., Ansah, L. O. (2025). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11866-3
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
- Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., ... Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
- Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 57-63.https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22
- Granić, A., Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational cotext: A systematic literature review. British Journal of EducationalTechnology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
- Haarala-Muhonen, A., Myyry, L., Pyörälä, E., Kallunki, V., Anttila, H., Katajavuori, N., Kinnunen, P., Tuononen, T. (2023). The impact of pedagogical and ICT training in teachers’ approaches to online teaching and use of digital tools. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1223665.
- Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and IndividualDifferences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
- Mollick, E., Mollick, L. (2023). How AI is Changing Teaching and Learning.
- Mutammimah, H., Rejeki, S., Kustini, S., Amelia, R. (2024). Understanding Teachers’ Perspective toward ChatGPT Acceptance in English Language Teaching. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(2), 290-307.
- Opesemowo, O. A. G. (2025). Teachers’ Attitude Towards the Use of ChatGPT for Educational Assessment. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 4(4).
- Parker, L. (2007a). Gender differences in computer attitudes, ability, and use in the preschool environment. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22(1), 39-51.
- Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. In 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Kuwait, Kuwait (pp. 1-9). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121
- Rahman, M. M., Islam, M. A., Rahman, M. S. (2026). Artificial intelligence adoption in education: Extending the technology acceptance model with risk and trust factors. Computers & Education (in press)
- Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber- Physical Systems, 3, 121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
- Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009.
- Venkatesh, V., Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
- Yeh, S. C., Wu, A., Yu, H., Wu, H., Kuo, Y., Chen, P. (2021). Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence and Its Connections to the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 13(16), 9165.https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169165
- Yilmaz, H., Maxutov, S., Baitekov, A., Balta, N. (2023). Student attitudes towards Chat GPT: A technology acceptance model survey. International EducationalReview, 1(1), 57-83.
- Zawacki-Richter, O., Latchem, C. (2018). Exploring the educational impact of Artificial Intelligence. Springer.
- Zhai, X. (2022). Critical Thinking and AI: Enhancing Student Engagement with ChatGPT.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2026-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2300-3405 (formerly 0867-6356) | Journal ISSN: 0867-6356
Language: English
Page range: 405 - 424
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 2, 2026
Published online: Oct 11, 2026
Published in print: Sep 1, 2026
Published by: Poznan University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:
© 2026 Bechir Fridhi, published by Poznan University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.