Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Software Measurement and Defect Prediction with Depress Extensible Framework Cover

Software Measurement and Defect Prediction with Depress Extensible Framework

Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences
Volume 39 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
By: Lech Madeyski and  Marek Majchrzak  
Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. [1] M. D'Ambros and M. Lanza, “Distributed and Collaborative Software Evolution Analysis with Churrasco,” Sci. Comput. Program., vol. 75, pp. 276-287, Apr. 2010.10.1016/j.scico.2009.07.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] G. Ghezzi and H. C. Gall, “Distributed and collaborative software analysis,” in Collaborative software engineering (I. Mistrik, J. Grundy, A. van der Hoek, and J. Whitehead, eds.), pp. 241-263, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, January 2010.10.1007/978-3-642-10294-3_12
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. H. Witten, “The WEKA data mining software: an update,” ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 10-18, 2009.10.1145/1656274.1656278
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] R. Ihaka and R. Gentleman, “R: A language for data analysis and graphics,” Journal of computational and graphical statistics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 299-314, 1996.10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] M. U. Guide, “The mathworks,” Inc., Natick, MA, vol. 5, 1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] M. R. Berthold, N. Cebron, F. Dill, T. R. Gabriel, T. Kötter, T. Meinl, P. Ohl, C. Sieb, K. Thiel, and B. Wiswedel, “KNIME: The Konstanz Information Miner,” in Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization (GfKL 2007), Springer, 2007.10.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_38
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] D. Morent, K. Stathatos, W.-C. Lin, and M. R. Berthold, “Comprehensive PMML preprocessing in KNIME,” in Proceedings of the 2011 workshop on Predictive markup language modeling, PMML '11, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 28-31, ACM, 2011.10.1145/2023598.2023602
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Data Mining Group, “PMML Powered.” http://www.dmg.org/products.html, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] T. Meinl and G. Landrum, “Get your chemistry right with knime,” Journal of Cheminformatics, vol. 5, no. Suppl 1, p. F1, 2013.10.1186/1758-2946-5-S1-F1
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] W. A. Warr, “Scientific workow systems: Pipeline Pilot and KNIME,” Journal of computer-aided molecular design, pp. 1-4, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] M. P. Mazanetz, R. J. Marmon, C. B. Reisser, and I. Morao, “Drug Discovery Applications for KNIME: An Open Source Data Mining Platform,” Current topics in medicinal chemistry, vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 1965-1979, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] M. Jureczko and J. Magott, “QualitySpy: a framework for monitoring software development processes,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Computer Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35-45, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Marian Jureczko and contributors, “Quality Spy.” http://java.net/projects/qualityspy.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] The Apache Software Foundation, “Apache License, Version 2.0.” http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] N. Fenton, P. Krause, M. Neil, and C. Lane, “A Probabilistic Model for Software Defect Prediction,” 2001.10.1007/3-540-44652-4_39
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] N. E. Fenton and M. Neil, “Software metrics: success, failures and new directions,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 47, pp. 149-157, July 1999.10.1016/S0164-1212(99)00035-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Agena, “Agenarisk Desktop.” <http://www.agenarisk.com>.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] S. Demeyer, S. Tichelaar, and S. Ducasse, “FAMIX 2.1 - The FAMOOS Information Exchange Model,” tech. rep., University of Berne, 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] TIOBE, “Programming Community Index.” http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html, 10 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Black Duck Software, “Ohloh Index.” https://www.ohloh.net/languages.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] H. C. Gall, B. Fluri, and M. Pinzger, “Change Analysis with Evolizer and ChangeDistiller,” IEEE Software, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 26-33, 2009.10.1109/MS.2009.6
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] B. Fluri, M. Würsch, M. Pinzger, and H. Gall, “Change distilling: Tree differencing for fine-grained source code change extraction,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 33, pp. 725-743, NOV 2007.10.1109/TSE.2007.70731
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] The Eclipse Foundation, “Eclipse.” http://www.eclipse.org/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] G. Ghezzi and H. C. Gall, “SOFAS: A Lightweight Architecture for Software Analysis as a Service,” in 2011 Ninth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, pp. 93-102, IEEE, June 2011.10.1109/WICSA.2011.21
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] W3C, “Sparql query language for rdf.” http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] M. Fischer, M. Pinzger, and H. Gall, “Populating a release history database from version control and bug tracking systems,” in Software Maintenance, 2003. ICSM 2003. Proceedings. International Conference on, pp. 23-32, IEEE, 2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] L. Madeyski and N. Radyk, “Judy-a mutation testing tool for Java,” Software, IET, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32-42, 2010. http://madeyski.e-informatyka.pl/download/Madeyski10b.pdf.10.1049/iet-sen.2008.0038
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] L. Madeyski, W. Orzeszyna, R. Torkar, and M. Józala, “Overcoming the equivalent mutant problem: A systematic literature review and a comparative experiment of second order mutation,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 40, pp. 23-42, January 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2013.44.10.1109/TSE.2013.44
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] L. Madeyski, Test-Driven Development: An Empirical Evaluation of Agile Practice. (Heidelberg, London, New York): Springer, 2010. http://www.springer.com/978-3-642-04287-4.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] L. Madeyski, “The impact of test-first programming on branch coverage and mutation score indicator of unit tests: An experiment,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 169-184, 2010. Draft: http://madeyski.e-informatyka.pl/download/Madeyski10c.pdf.10.1016/j.infsof.2009.08.007
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. [31] L. Madeyski, “The impact of pair programming on thoroughness and fault detection effectiveness of unit tests suites,” Software Process: Improvement and Practice, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 281-295, 2008. Draft: <http://madeyski.e-informatyka.pl/download/Madeyski08.pdf>.10.1002/spip.382
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] JaCoCo. http://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. [33] F. Sauer, “Eclipse metrics plugin.” http://metrics.sourceforge.net/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. [34] Checkstyle. http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. [35] PMD. http:/pmd.sourceforge.net/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. [36] PIT. http:/pitest.org/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. [37] FindBugs. http:/findbugs.sourceforge.net/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. [38] S. R. Chidamber and C. F. Kemerer, “A metrics suite for object oriented design,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 476-493, 1994.10.1109/32.295895
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. [39] N. Nagappan, B. Murphy, and V. Basili, “The inuence of organizational structure on software quality: an empirical case study,” in Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering, pp. 521-530, ACM, 2008.10.1145/1368088.1368160
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. [40] Atlassian, “REST Plugin Module.”
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. [41] TMate Software, “SVNKit.” http://svnkit.com/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. [42] R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. [43] I. H. Witten, E. Frank, and M. A. Hall, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 3rd ed., 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. [44] G. Williams, M. Hahsler, H. Ishwaran, U. B. Kogalur, and R. Guha, pmml: Package 'pmml', 2012. R package version 1.2.32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. [45] BIRT. http://www.eclipse.org/birt/phoenix/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. [46] N. Nagappan, T. Ball, and A. Zeller, “Mining metrics to predict component failures,” in Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, pp. 452-461, ACM, 2006.10.1145/1134285.1134349
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. [47] L. Madeyski and M. Majchrzak, “ImpressiveCode DePress (Defect Prediction for software systems) Extensible Framework,” 2012. Available as an open source project from GitHub: https://github.com/ImpressiveCode/ic-depress.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. [48] T. Menzies, B. Caglayan, Z. He, E. Kocaguneli, J. Krall, F. Peters, and B. Turhan, “The PROMISE Repository of empirical software engineering data,” June 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. [49] M. Jureczko and L. Madeyski, “Towards identifying software project clusters with regard to defect prediction,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE '10, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 9:1-9:10, ACM, 2010.10.1145/1868328.1868342
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. [50] L. Madeyski and M. Jureczko, “Which Process Metrics Can Significantly Improve Defect Prediction Models? An Empirical Study,” Software Quality Journal, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11219-014-9241-7 (accepted), preprint: http://madeyski.e-informatyka.pl/download/Madeyski14SQJ.pdf.10.1007/s11219-014-9241-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. [51] D. De Roure, C. Goble, and R. Stevens, “The design and realisation of the myexperiment virtual research environment for social sharing of workows,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 25, pp. 561-567, 2009.10.1016/j.future.2008.06.010
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. [52] Free Software Foundation, Inc., “GNU General Public License.” http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. [53] GitHub Inc. http://www.github.com.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. [54] L. Dabbish, C. Stuart, J. Tsay, and J. Herbsleb, “Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository,” in Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '12, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 1277-1286, ACM, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. [55] M. Majchrzak and L. Madeyski, “DePress JIRA.” https://depress.atlassian.net/browse/DEP, 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. [56] L. Madeyski and M. Majchrzak, “DePress GitHub Issues.” https://github.com/ImpressiveCode/ic-depress/issues, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. [57] N. Nagappan, A. Zeller, T. Zimmermann, K. Herzig, and B. Murphy, “Change Bursts as Defect Predictors,” in Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE), 2010 IEEE 21st International Symposium on, pp. 309 -318, nov. 2010.10.1109/ISSRE.2010.25
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2014-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2300-3405 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6356
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 249 - 270
Published on: Dec 20, 2014
Published by: Poznan University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
mining in software repositories,
software metrics,
KNIME,
defect prediction
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Software development

© 2014 Lech Madeyski, Marek Majchrzak, published by Poznan University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 39 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)Next article