A Comparison of Composite Specimens Damage area Measurements Performed using Pulsed Thermography and Ultrasonic NDT Methods

Luziński, Rafał; Ziemkiewicz, Jarosław; Synaszko, Piotr; Żyluk, Andrzej; Dragan, Krzysztof

doi:10.2478/fas-2019-0007

Abstract

Carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRPs) are widely used in aerospace structures due to their high stiffness, strength and good fatigue properties. They are however vulnerable to loads perpendicular to their plane and, while impacted, can suffer significant internal damage decreasing their overall strength. Detecting and sizing such damage is an important task of the non-destructive inspection (NDI) methods. This study was conducted to detect and quantify damage in a set of six impacted even rectangular CFRP specimens designed from a MiG-29 vertical stabilizer’s skin. The inspection was done using the ultrasonic (UT) method (based on mobile scanner – MAUS V) and the pulsed infrared thermographic (IRT) method. Each specimen’s inside and outside (impacted) surface was inspected separately with IRT, while the outside surface was then inspected with UT. UT provided the most precise measurements of the damage area, while the IRT inspection of the outside surface (which would be accessible on a real aircraft structure) provided underestimated values due to the damage’s depth and geometry.

References

[1] Ball, R.J. and Almond, D.P. (1998). The detection and measurement of impact damage in thick carbon fiber reinforced laminates by transient thermography. NDT&E International, Volume 31, Issue 3, June 1998, ISSN 0963-8695, pp. 165-173.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] Campbell, F. (2010). Composite Mechanical Properties. in F. Campbell, Structural Composite Materials. ASM International, ISBN 978-1-61503-037-8, pp. 373-400.10.31399/asm.tb.scm.t52870373
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] Duan, Y., Zhang, H., Maldague, X. P., Ibarra-Castanedo, C., Servais, P., Genest, M. and Meng, J. (2019). Reliability assessment of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing for impact damage of CFRP panels. NDT&E International, Volume 102, March 2019, ISSN 0963-0695, pp. 77-83.10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] Garnier, C., Marie-Laetitia, P., Florent, E. and Bernard, L. (2011). The detection of aeronautical defects in situ on composite structures using Non Destructive Testing. Composite Structures, Volume 93, Issue 5, ISSN 0263-8223, pp. 1328-1336.10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.017
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] Gholizadeh, S. (2016). A review of non-destructive testing methods of composite materials. Procedia Structural Integrity, Volume 1, ISSN 2452-3216.10.1016/j.prostr.2016.02.008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] Mihai, A., Stefanescu, F., Dumitrache-Rujinski, A. and Neagu, G. (2012). Composite Materials Flaws Detection and Measurement by Infrared Thermography. University Politechnica of Bucharest.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] Nettles, A. T. and Hodge, A. J. (1997). NASA/TM-97-206317 Report: The Impact Response of Carbon/EpoxyLaminates. Alabama: Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] Roach, D. P. and Rice, T. M. (2016). DOT/FAA/TC-15/4 Report: A Quantitative Assessment of Advanced Nondestructive Inspection Techniques for Detecting Flaws in Composite Laminate Aircraft Structures. New Jersey: Federal Aviation Administration.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] Shepard, S. M. (2007). Flash Thermography of Aerospace Composites. IV Conferencia Panamericana de END. Thermal Wave Imaging, Inc.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

A Comparison of Composite Specimens Damage area Measurements Performed using Pulsed Thermography and Ultrasonic NDT Methods

Abstract

Paradigm

My account