Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Extraterritorial Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Light of Modern Approaches Cover

Extraterritorial Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Light of Modern Approaches

Open Access
|Jul 2024

References

  1. BEHRENS P. The extraterritorial reach of EU competition law revisited – The “effects doctrine” before the ECJ. Discussion Paper. 2016, no. 3, pp. 1–15. [online] Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/148068/1/87238506x.pdf
  2. BERKES A. The extraterritorial human rights obligations of the EU in its external trade and investment policies. Europe and the World: A law review. 2018, vol. 2, issue 1, рр. 1–21. [online] Available at: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/19661/1/FullText.pdf
  3. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v Council of the European Union. Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber), 13 September 2023. Case T65/18 RENV. [online] Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=extraterritorial&docid=277442&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3733838#ctx1
  4. Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG, Südzucker AG, Agrana Zucker Gmbh. Opinion of Advocate General Bobek, 2 September 2021. Case C151/20. [online] Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=extraterritorial&docid=245556&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3733838#ctx1
  5. Case 214/94 Ingrid Boukhalfa v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Judgment of the ECJ of 30 April 1996), [1996] ECR I-02253. [online] Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEx:61994J0214:EN:hTML
  6. Case 237/83 SARL Prodest v. Caisse Primaire d’Assurance Maladie de Paris (ECJ 12 July 1984), [1984] ECR 03153. Para. 6. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?uri=CELEx%3A61983CJ0237
  7. Case 48/69 Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. v. Commission of the European Communities (Judgment of the ECJ of 14 July 1972), [1972] ECR 619. [online] Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELExnumdoc&numdoc=61969J0048&lg=en
  8. Case 6/72 Europemballage Corporation and Continental Can Company Inc. v. Commission of the European Communities (Judgment of the ECJ of 21 February 1973), [1973] ECR 215. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?uri=CELEx%3A61972CJ0006
  9. Case 9/88 Mário Lopes da Veiga v. Staatssecretaris van Justitie (ECJ 27 September 1989), [1989] ECR 02989. [online] Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?qid=1484604389892&uri=CELEx:61988CJ0009
  10. Case C-149/96 Portugal v. Council (ECJ 23 November 1999), [1999] ECR I-08395. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/hTML/?uri=ecli:ECLI:EU:C:1999:574
  11. Case C-366/10 Air Transport Association of America and Others v. Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Judgment of the Court of 21 December 2011), [2011] ECR 2011-00000. [online] Available at: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=117193&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=106658
  12. Case C-377/98 Kingdom of the Netherlands v. European Parliament and Council of the European Union (ECJ 9 October 2001), [2001] ECR I-07079. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?uri=CELEx%3A61998CJ0377
  13. Case C-413/14 P Intel Corporation Inc. v. European Commission (Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 September 2017 [Text rectified by orders of 19 September and 24 October 2017]). ECLI:EU:C:2017:632. [online] Available at: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=C1072FDD4C1F6DEEF6ED0356BE445505?text=&docid=194082&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=353468
  14. Case C-61/94 Commission of the European Communities v. Federal Republic of Germany (ECJ 10 September 1996), [1994] ECR I-03989. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TxT/?uri=CELEx%3A61994CJ0061&print=true
  15. Case T-102/96 Gencor Ltd v. Commission of the European Communities (ECJ 25 March 1999), [1999] ECR II-00753. [online] Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?qid=1484653360889&uri=CELEx:61996TJ0102
  16. Case T-286/09 Intel Corporation Inc. v. European Commission (Judgement of the General Court of the European Union of 12 June 2014). [online] Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?qid=1484603038618&uri=CELEx:62009TJ0286
  17. Commission Decision 85/202/EEC of 19 December 1984 relating to a procedure under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/29.725 – Wood pulp). Official Journal of the European Communities. L 85. Vol. 28. 26 March 1985. pp. 1–52. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?uri=OJ:L:1985:085:TOC
  18. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union. C 202/01. Vol. 59. 7 June 2016. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/hTML/?uri=OJ:C:2016:202:FULL&from=EN
  19. Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union. L 24. Vol. 47. 29 January 2004. pp. 1–22. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?uri=OJ:L:2004:024:TOC&toc=OJ:C:2017:026:FULL
  20. FALALIEIEVA, L. Ekstraterytorialna diia norm prava YeS: osoblyvosti teorii ta praktyky zastosuvannia. Pam’iati profesora Pavla Petrovycha Zavorotka. Aktualni problemy pravovoi nauky: zb. nauk. statei / za zah. red. N. P. Shyshkovoi; Kyivskyi nats. un-t imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Kyiv: Pretsedent, 2014. S. 154–161 (in Ukrainian).
  21. FALALIEIEVA, L. Modern Approaches to the Extraterritorial Application of the EU Law. European Studies – The Review of European Law, Economics and Politics. 2014, vol. 1, pp. 103–110.
  22. FALALIEIEVA, L. Prava liudyny ta ekstraterytorialna diia prava YeS: evoliutsiia praktyky zastosuvannia yurysdyktsiinykh modelei. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Mizhnar. vidnosyny. 2017. Vyp. 1 (46). S. 91–97 (in Ukrainian).
  23. FALALIEIEVA, L. Vplyv sudovoi praktyky na ekstraterytorialnu diiu norm prava Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. Aktualni doslidzhennia v yurysprudentsii: materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. internet-konferentsii (Ternopil, 14 hrud. 2013 r.). Ternopil, 2013. S. 22–23. [online]. Available at: http://www.lex-line.com.ua (in Ukrainian).
  24. JENNINGS R. Y. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and the United States Antitrust Law. British Year Book of International Law. 1957, vol. 33, p. 157.
  25. Joined cases 89, 104, 114, 116, 117 and 125 to 129/85 A. Ahlström Osakeyhtiö and others v. Commission of the European Communities (ECJ 28 September 1988), [1988] ECR 5193. [online] Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?qid=1484647592793&uri=CELEx:61985CJ0089(01)
  26. KHRYSTOVA, H. Pozytyvni zobov’iazannia derzhavy u sferi prav liudyny: suchasni vyklyky: monohr. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2018, 680 s. (in Ukrainian)
  27. LANGE DIETER, G. F., SANDAGE, J. B. The Wood Pulp Decision and its Implications for the Scope of EC Competition Law. Common Market Law Review. 1989, issue 26, pp. 137–165.
  28. MEDVEDIEVA, M. O. Teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty realizatsii mizhnarodno-pravovykh norm u haluzi okhorony navkolyshnoho seredovyshcha / za nauk. red. prof. O. V. Zadorozhnoho. Kyiv: Feniks, 2012, 484 s. (in Ukrainian)
  29. MURAVIOV, V. I. Pravovi zasady rehuliuvannia ekonomichnykh vidnosyn Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu z tretimy krainamy (teoriia i praktyka): monohr. Kyiv: Akadem-Pres, 2002, 426 s. (in Ukrainian).
  30. NAUWELAERTS, W. The Extra-Territorial Reach of EU Data Protection Law. July 2019, pp. 1–2. [online] Available at: https://www.sidley.com/-/media/publications/the-extraterritorial-reach-of-eu-data-protection-law.pdf?la=en
  31. PEREMOT, S. Ekstraterytorialne zastosuvannia konkurentnoho prava YeS: vynyknennia ta rozvytok yurysdyktsiinoi modeli. Ukrainskyi shchorichnyk mizhnarodnoho prava. 2009. Kyiv: Vyd-vo «Feniks», 2014, S. 361–402 (in Ukrainian).
  32. PEREMOT, S. V. Ekstraterytorialna yurysdyktsiia. Entsyklopediia mizhnarodnoho prava: u 3 t. / redkol.: Yu. S. Shemshuchenko, V. N. Denysov (spivholovy) ta in.; In-t derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy. Kyiv: Akademperiodyka, 2017. T. 2: E–L. S. 49 (in Ukrainian).
  33. Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank (ECB). Opinion of Advocate General Kokott, 25 May 2023. Cases C750/21 P and C256/22 P. [online] Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=extraterritorial&docid=274111&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3733838#ctx1
  34. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union. L 119, vol. 59, 4 May 2016, pp. 1–88. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
  35. RYNGAERT, C. EU Trade Agreements and human Rights: From Extraterritorial to Territorial Obligations. International Community Law Review. 2018, vol. 20, issue 3–4, рр. 374–393. [online] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326335056_EU_Trade_Agreements_and_human_Rights_From_Extraterritorial_to_Territorial_Obligations/fulltext/5bb7a22e92851c7fde2f1d7d/EU-Trade-Agreements-and-human-Rights-From-Extraterritorial-to-Territorial-Obligations.pdf
  36. SATO, C. Extraterritorial Application of EU Competition Law. Is It Possible for Japanese Companies to Steer Clear of EU Competition Law? Journal of Political Science and Sociology. 2010, no. 11, pp. 23–47.
  37. SMYRNOVA, K. V. Pravovyi poriadok konkurentsii v Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi (novitni tendentsii rozvytku): avtoref. dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.11 / Kyivskyi nats. un-t imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Kyiv, 2015, 40 s. (in Ukrainian).
  38. United States v. Aluminum Co. of America (Alcoa), 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945). 12 March 1945. [online] Available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/148/416/1503668/
  39. VAN BAEL, I. Due Process in EU Competition Proceedings. Alphen van den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011, 546 p.
Language: English
Page range: 124 - 148
Published on: Jul 10, 2024
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Liudmyla Falalieieva, Bohdan Strilets, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.