Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Capital Movement Restrictions in EU Law: Retrospective and Modern Approaches, Development Trends

European Studies
Volume 10 (2023): Issue 1 (December 2023)
By:
Open Access
|Feb 2024

References

  1. Amurta SGPS v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Amsterdam. Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 November 2007. Case C-379/05 [online]. Available at: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62005CJ0379:EN:NOT
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Baars v Inspecteur der Belastingen Particulieren/Ondernemingen Gorinchem. Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 April 2000. Case C-251/98. European Court Reports 2000 I-02787 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61998CJ0251
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Banking Package 2021: new EU rules to strengthen banks’ resilience and better prepare for the future [online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_5401
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Capital movements [online]. Available at: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/regulation-and-supervision/capital-movements_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1108 of 7 May 2018 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regulatory technical standards on the criteria for the appointment of central contact points for electronic money issuers and payment service providers and with rules on their functions (Text with EEA relevance.). C/2018/2716. Official Journal of European Union L 203, 10.08.2018, pp. 2–6 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018R1108
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/758 of 31 January 2019 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the minimum action and the type of additional measures credit and financial institutions must take to mitigate money laundering and terrorist financing risk in certain third countries (Text with EEA relevance.) [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32019R0758
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany. Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations. Article 56 EC. Legislative provisions concerning the public limited company Volkswagen. Opinion of Mr Advocate General Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered on 13 February 2007. Case C-112/05. Commission v Germany [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:62005CC0112&from=LT
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic. Case 194/84. Judgment of the Court of 03 December 1987 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/GA/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61984CJ0194
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Commission staff working document on the movement of capital and the freedom of payments. Brussels, 7 April 2021 (OR. en) 7578/21. 59 p. [online]. Available at: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-7578-2021-INIT/en/pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Communication from the Commission on capital market union: Progress on building a single market for capital for a strong economic and monetary union [online]. Available at: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/communication-commission-capital-market-union-progress-building-single-market-capital-strong_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Consolidated Version of the Treaty establishing the European Community. Official Journal of the European Communities. 1997, С340/1733. 143 p. [online]. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3c32722f-0136-4d8f-a03ebfaf70d16349
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of European Union С 326, 26.10.2012, Vol. 55, p. 412 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012E%2FTXT
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 of 27 May 2016 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and repealing Decision 2013/183/CFSP. Official Journal of European Union L 141, 28.05.2016, pр. 79–124 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016D0849
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1720 of 14 October 2019 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua. Official Journal of European Union L 262, 15.10.2019, pр. 58–63 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019D1720
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 of 11 November 2019 concerning restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorised drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean. Official Journal of European Union L 291, 12.11.2019, pр. 47–53 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/GA/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019D1894
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Official Journal of European Union L 78, 17.03.2014, pр. 16–21 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32014D0145
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine. Official Journal of European Union L 229, 31.07.2014, pр. 13–17. [online]. Available at: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014D0512
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Official Journal of European Union L 78, 17.03.2014, pр. 6–15 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0269
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Criminal proceedings against Guerrino Casati. Judgment of the Court of 11 November 1981. Case 203/80 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61980CJ0203
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. DARVAS, Z., HUTTL, P., MERLER, S., WALSH, T. Analysis of developments in EU capital flows in the global context. Final study. Bruegel. 2015, № 2015.2574. 200 p. [online]. Available at: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-06/study-bruegel-capital-flows-03112015_en.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of European Union L 141, 5.06.2015, pp. 73–117 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32015L0849
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Directive (EU) 2019/1153 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 laying down rules facilitating the use of financial and other information for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of certain criminal offences, and repealing Council Decision 2000/642/JHA [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32019L1153.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Directive (EU) 88/361/EEC of the Council of 24 June 1988 for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A31988L0361
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Erika Waltraud Ilse Hollmann v Fazenda Pública. Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 October 2007. Case C-443/06 [online]. Available at: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62006CJ0443:EN:PDF
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. EU foreign investment screening and export controls help underpin European security. Press release. 19 October 2023, Brussels [online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_5125
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement [online]. Available at: https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/japan/eu-japan-agreement_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. EU restrictive measures in response to the crisis in Ukraine [online]. Available at: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/eu-and-world/sanctions-restrictive-measures/sanctions-adopted-following-russias-military-aggression-against-ukraine_en#timeline-measures-adopted-in-2022-2023
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. EU restrictive measures in response to the crisis in Ukraine [online]. Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/node/30963_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. European Commission v French Republic. Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 October 2018. Case C-416/17 [online]. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-416/17
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. European Commission v Hungary. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 May 2019. Case C-235/17 [online]. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-235/17
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium. Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 April 2018. Case C-110/17 [online]. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-110/17
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. European Parliament v Council of the European Union. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 19 July 2012. Case C130/10 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62010CJ0130
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. European Union sanctions [online]. Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/european-union-sanctions_en#10710
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Européenne et Luxembourgeoise d’investissements SA (ELISA) v Directeur général des impôts and Ministère public. Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 October 2007. Case C-451/05 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62005CJ0451&qid=1686077369936
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Finanzamt Hamburg-Am Tierpark v Burda GmbH. Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 June 2008. Case C-284/06. I-04571 [online]. Available at: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62006CJ0284
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. First Directive (EU) of the Council of 11 Мау 1960 for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty. Official Journal of European Union L 043, 12.07.1960, рp. 0921–0932 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31960L0921
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. FRAG A, L. S., HINDELANG, S. The Free Movement of Capital and Foreign Direct Investment: The Scope of Protection in EU Law. European Journal of International Law. 2010, vol. 21, issue 2, pp. 496–499 [online]. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/21/2/496/374222
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. HAMUĽÁK, O. Unveiling the overlooked freedom – the context of free movement of capital and payments in the EU law. International and Comparative Law Review. 2012, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 129–145 [online]. Available at: https://intapi.sciendo.com/pdf/10.1515/iclr-2016-0091
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. HEMELS, S. et al. Freedom of establishment or free movement of capital: is there an order of priority? Conflicting visions of national courts and the ECJ. EC Tax Review. 2010, Vol. 1, pp. 19–31 [online]. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1959832
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Iran: EU restrictive measures. [online]. Avaliable at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions/iran/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Klaus Konle v Republik Österreich. European Court Reports. 1999. I-03099. Judgment of the Court of 01 June 1999 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61997CJ0302
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Manfred Trummer and Peter Mayer. Judgment of the Court of 16 March 1999. Case C-222/97 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61997CJ0222
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. MUKWIRI, J. Brexit and implications for the free movement of capital. Legal issues of economic integration. 2019, № 46 (1), pp. 7–28 [online]. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.kluwer/liei0046&div=6&id=&page=
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. NIJKEUTER, E., MAARTEN, F. «FII 2» and the Applicable Freedoms of Movement in Third Country Situations. EC Tax Review. 2013, Vol 22, pp. 250–257 [online]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2331989
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. OECD. OECD Code of Liberalisation of Capital Movements. 2019 [online]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/g20/summits/osaka/OECD-Codes-of-capital-movements.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. PALAZOV, Petko. Is De-Risking one of the Indications for an Emerging Competition between the Free Movement of Capital and the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations? International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol. XXVII. 2021, No 2. pp. 57–64 [online]. Available at: https://sciendo.com/de/article/10.2478/kbo-2021-0048
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. PIROSKA, D., EPSTEIN, R. Stalled by design: New paradoxes in the European Union’s single financial market. Journal of European integration. 2023, Vol. 45, № 1, pp. 181–201 [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2154344/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Regulation (EU) No 1219/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investment agreements between Member States and third countries. Official Journal of European Union L 351, 20.12.2012, pp. 40–46 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32012R1219
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investments into the Union. Official Journal of European Union L 79I, 21.03.2019, pp. 1–14 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/452/oj
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU). № 648/2012 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/575/oj
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Counsil on the application of Chapter IV of Regulation (EU) 2015/847 on information accompanying transfers of funds. COM/2019/282 final. Official Journal of European Union L 125, 14.05.2019, pp. 4–10 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2019:282:FIN
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. SAMOILENKO, Y., ZAVHORODNIA, V. Vilnyi rukh kapitalu u pravovomu rehuliuvanni finansovoho rynku Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu ta perspektyvy vykorystannia yevropeiskoho dosvidu dlia Ukrainy. Pravove rehuliuvannia vidnosyn na finansovomu rynku: stan ta napriamy vdoskonalennia: monohrafiia, vidp. red. V. D. Chernadchuk. Sumy: VVP «Mriia» TOV. 2013. рр. 275–307 [online]. Available at: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstream-download/123456789/50052/8/Zavhorodnia_Samoilenko_vilnyi_rukh_kapitalu.pdf;jsessionid=09386B0619E4C93FF1AB7E61CCA428E3 (in Ukrainian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. SCHALL, A. Free capital movement vs. freedom of establishment in light of Brexit. Thesis paper [online]. Available at: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/migrated/free_capital_movement_vs._freedom_of_establishment_in_light_of_brexit_0.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Second Directive (EU) 63/21/EEC of the Council of 18 December 1962 adding to and amending the First Directive for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty. Official Journal of European Union L 9, 22.01.1963, pp. 62–74 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A31963L0021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Single European Act, 29.06.1987. Official Journal of the European Communities. L 169/1. 29.06.1987, pp. 1–28 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:11986U/TXT&from=EN
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. ŠIŠKOVÁ, Naděžda, HAMULÁK, Ondrej (eds.). Evropské právo 2. Jednotný vnitřní trh. Prague: Wolters Kluwer, 2012, pp. 84–95.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. Skatteverket v A. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2007. Case C-101/05 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62005CJ0101
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. Société d’investissement pour l’agriculture tropicale SA (SIAT) v État belge. Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 5 July 2012. Case C318/10 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62010CJ0318
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. Staatssecretaris van Financiën v L.A.C. van Putten and Others. Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 26 April 2012. Joined Cases C578/10 to C580/10 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62010CJ0578
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. STRILETS, B. Pravove rehuliuvannia investytsiinoi diialnosti v Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi [Tekst] : dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.11 / Instytyt zakonodavstva Verkhov. Rady Ukrainy. Kyiv, 2020. 256 р. (in Ukrainian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. STRILETS, B. Svoboda rukhu kapitalu ta investytsiina diialnist u Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava. 2015, № 1, pp. 299–304 [online]. Available at: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=Chkup_2015_1_72 (in Ukrainian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. The IMF’s Institutional View on Capital Flows in Practice. Group of twenty [online]. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/pdf/2018/073018.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (Rome, 25 March 1957). Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3Axy0023/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  64. Treaty on European Union (Maastricht, 07 February 1992). Official Journal of the European Communities C 191, 29/07/1992, pp. 0001–0110 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:11992M/TXT
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  65. YAKOVIUK, I., ANAKINA, T., TRAHNIUK, O., KOMAROVA, T. Istoriia yevropeiskoi intehratsii vid Rymskoi imperii do Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu: monohrafiia / za red. I. V. Yakoviuka. Kyiv: Red. zhurn. «Pravo Ukrainy», 2012. 208 p. [online]. Available at: https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/1210 (in Ukrainian),
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  66. WINFRIED, L. Holböck v Finanzamt Salzburg-Land. Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 May 2007. Case C-157/05. I-04051 [online]. Available at: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62005CJ0157
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  67. ZWARTKRUIS, W., DE JONG, B. The EU regulation on screening of foreign direct investment: a game changer? European Business Law Review. 2020, Issue 31, pp. 447–474.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eustu-2023-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6695
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 53 - 86
Published on: Feb 21, 2024
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
European Union,
EU law,
Court of Justice of the European Union,
capital,
investment,
free movement of capital,
liberalization of capital movements,
restrictions on the movement of capital,
armed conflicts,
sanctions,
the Capital Markets Union,
macroprudential measures,
investment agreements,
investment screening
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other,
Law,
Law, other,
Social sciences,
Political science,
Political science, other

© 2024 Liudmyla Falalieieva, Bohdan Strilets, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 10 (2023): Issue 1 (December 2023)Next article