EU Member States’ Representation in the European Parliament: the Politics of Seat Reapportionment in a Historical Perspective

Charvát, Jakub

doi:10.2478/eustu-2022-0007

Abstract

Modern democratic political systems are hardly conceivable without political representation. This also applies to the political system of the EU, and namely the European Parliament. The EP has undergone several changes over time, including changes in its composition. The case study addresses the composition of the EP from the historical perspective. It investigates the origins of the EP’s composition, reapportionment strategies chosen and their effects on malapportionment of the EP seats. When changing the EP’s composition, the accommodation, expansionary and redistributive modes can be distinguished. While the accommodation mode is closely linked to the processes of enlargement, the expansionary and redistributive modes follow both enlargements and institutional reforms. The redistribution mode may be the strategy for the maintenance of malapportionment while the expansionary mode is a way to reduce the disproportionality of seat allocation among Member States in the context of institutional reforms, at least until the 1990s.

References

BALINSKI, M. L., YOUNG, H. P. Fair Representation in the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies. 1982, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 361–373.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BAYSAL, A. national Representation in European Democracy: Seat Apportionment in the European Parliament. Conference paper, European Union Studies Association Fifteenth biennial Conference, May 4–6, 2017, Miami, Florida [online]. Available at: https://eustudies.org/conference/papers/14
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CEGIEŁKA, K. Degressively Proportional Apportionment of Seats in the European Parliament. From a Simple Idea to a Problematic Legal Rule. Mathematical Economics. 2016, vol. 12, no. 19, pp. 15–30.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CEGIEŁKA, K., DNIESTRZAŃSKI, P., ŁYKO, J., MACIUK, A., RUDEK, R. On Ordering a Set of Degressively Proportional Apportionments. In NGUYEN, N., KOWALCZYK, A., MERCIK, J. (eds.). Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXVII. berlin, Heidelerg: Springer, 2017, pp. 55–63.10.1007/978-3-319-70647-4_4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CEGIEŁKA, K., ŁYKO, J., RUDEK, R. beyond the Cambridge Compromise algorithm towards degressively proportional allocations. Operational Research. 2017, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 317–332.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CHARVÁT, J. Zastoupení členských zemí a hodnota hlasu v evropských volbách 2014. Central European Journal of Politics. 2015, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 71–78.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CHARVÁT, J. Poměrné sestupné zastoupení v Evropském parlamentu: unijní právo vs. realita. Mezinárodní vztahy/Czech Journal of International Studies. 2019, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 22–40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CICHOCKI, M. A., ŻYCZKOWSKI, K. (eds.). Institutional Design and Voting Power in the European Union. London: Ashgate, 2010.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
COWAN, S. K. Periodic Discordance between Vote Equality and Representational Equality in the United States. Sociological Science. 2015, vol. 2, pp. 442–453.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DEHOUSSE, F. Rapport de Fernand Dehousse sur les Institutions de la Communauté européenne (La Haye, 8-10 octobre 1953) [online], 1953. Available at: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/rapport_de_fernand_dehousse_sur_les_institutions_de_la_communaute_europeenne_la_haye_8_10_octobre_1953-fr-d416e1c6-b1f8-43df-bd81-906f8bd87a91.html
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DELGADO-MÁRQUEZ, B. L., KAEDING, M., PALOMARES, A. A more balanced composition of the European Parliament with degressive proportionality. European Union Politics. 2013, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 458–471.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DNIESTRZAŃSKI, P. Degressive proportionality: source, findings and discussion of the Cambridge Compromise. Mathematical Ecomomics. 2011, vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 39–50.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DNIESTRZAŃSKI, P., ŁYKO, J. MISZTAL, A. Degresywna proporcjalność w dystybucji dóbr niepodzielnych. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego ve Wrocławiu, 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DUFF, A. Finding the balance of power in a post-national democracy. Mathematical Social Sciences. 2012, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 74–77.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EUROPEAN COUNCIL. Act concerning the election of the representatives of the Assembly by direct universal suffrage. Official Journal of the European Communities. 1976, 19 (L 278), pp. 5–11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EUROPEAN COUNCIL. European Council in Edinburgh, 11–12 December 1992: Conclusions of the Presidency [online], 1992. Available at:
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EUROPEAN COUNCIL. Decision amending the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, annexed to Council Decision 76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom of 20 September 1976. Official Journal of the European Communities. 1993, L 033, p. 15.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EUROPEAN COUNCIL. European Council Decision of 28 June 2013 establishing the composition of the European Parliament (2013/312/EU). Official Journal of the European Union. 2013, L 181, pp. 57–58.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Resolution on the adoption of a draft convention introducing elections to the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage. Official Journal of European Communities. 1975, C 32/15.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. European Parliament Resolution of 9 October 1991 on democratic representation in the European Parliament of the 16 million new Germany EC citizens (b3-1531/91/rev.). Official Journal of European Communities. 1991, C 280, p. 94.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. European Parliament resolution of 7 February 2018 on the composition of the European Parliament (2017/2054(InL) – 2017/0900(nLE)), 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HUBER, C. H. Approaches to European Elections. In: SASSE, C., BREW, D. A., GEORGEL, J., HAND, G., HUBER, C. H., VAN DEN BERGHE, G. (eds.). The European Parliament: Towards a Uniform Procedure for Direct Elections. Firenze: European University Institute, 1981, pp. 83–180.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LOOSEMORE, J., HANBY, V. J. The Theoretical Limits of Maximum Distortion: Some Analytical Expressions for Electoral Systems. British Journal of Political Science. 1971, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 467–477.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ŁYKO, J., RUDEK, R. A fast exact algorithm for the allocation of seats for the EU Parliament. Expert Systems with Applications. 2013, vol. 40, no. 13, pp. 5284–5291.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MISZTAL, A. Adjustment Function as a Tool for Distribution of Seats in the European Parliament. Mathematical Economics. 2011, vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 138–154.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MISZTAL, A. Degresywna proporcjonalność a kształtowanie składu Parlamentu Europe-jskiego. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego ve Wrocławiu, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MOBERG, A. EP seats: The politics behind math. Mathematical Social Sciences. 2012, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 78–84.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
PETERNEK, P., KOŚNY, M. The Allocation of Seats in the European Parliament and the Principle of Degressive Proportionality. Mathematical Economics. 2015, vol. 11, no. 18, pp. 99–113.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
PIERSON, P. The Path to the European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis. Comparative Political Studies. 1996, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 123–163.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
PUKELSHEIM, F. Putting Citizens First: Representation and Power in the European Union. In: CICHOCKI, M. A., ŻYCZKOWSKI, K. (eds.). Institutional Design and Voting Power in the European Union. London: Ashgate, 2010, pp. 235–254.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
PUKELSHEIM, F., GRIMMETT, G. R. 2018. Degressive Representation of Member States in the European Parliament 2019–24. Representation. 2018, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 147–158.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RAMÍREZ GOnZÁLEZ, V., PALOMAREZ, A., MÁRQUEZ, M. L. Degressively proportional methods for the allotment of the European Parliament seats amongst the EU member states. In: SIMEONE, B., PUKELSHEIM, F. (eds.). Mathematics and Democracy: Recent Advances in Voting Systems and Collective Choice. berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2006, pp. 205–220.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RITTBERGER, B. Building Europe´s Parliament: Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.10.1093/0199273421.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RITTBERGER, B. The historical origins of the EU´s system of representation. Journal of European Public Policy. 2009, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 43–61.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RITTBERGER, B. Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2012, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 18–37.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RODDEN, J. Strength in numbers? Representation and Redistribution in the European Union. European Union Politics. 2002, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 151–175.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ROSE, R. Representing Europeans: A Pragmatic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199654765.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ROSE, R., BERNHAGEN, P., BORZ, G. Evaluating competing criteria for allocating parliamentary seats. Mathematical Social Sciences. 2012, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 85–89.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SAMUELS, D., SNYDER, R. The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science. 2001, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 651–677.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SPIERENBURG, D., POIDEVIN, R. The History of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community: Supranationality in Operation. London: Weidenfeld and nicholson, 1994.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TAAGEPERA, R. Predicting Party Sizes: The Logic of Simple Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199287741.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TAAGEPERA, R., HOSLI, M. O. national Representation in International Organizations: The Seat Allocation Model Implicit in the EU Council and Parliament. Political Studies. 2006, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 370–398.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TAAGEPERA, R., LAAKSO, M. Proportionality Profiles of West European Electoral Systems. European Journal of Political Research. 1980, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 423–446.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
THEIL, H., SCHRAGE, L. The Apportionment Problem and the European Parliament. European Economic Review. 1977, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 247–263.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TRZAZKOWSKI, R., POPIELAWSKA, J. How European are the European Elections? The European Pariament´s Long Struggle for a Direct and Universal Suffrage Conducted According to a Uniform Electoral Procedure. In KUŻELEWSKA, E., KLOZA, D. (eds.). Elections to the European Parliament as a Challenge for Democracy. Warszawa, Białystok: Oficyna Wydawicza ASPRA-JP, 2013, pp. 27–42.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
VIOLA, D. M. The genesis of the European Parliament: From appointed Consultative Assembly to directly elected legislative body. In VIOLA, D. M. (ed.). Handbook of European Elections. London, new York: Routledge, 2016, pp. 3–16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

EU Member States’ Representation in the European Parliament: the Politics of Seat Reapportionment in a Historical Perspective

Abstract

Paradigm

My account