Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Telecollaboration: Fostering Foreign Language Learning at a Distance

Open Access
|Jan 2020

References

  1. 1. Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97.10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
  2. 2. Angelova, M., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Using an online collaborative project between American and Chinese students to develop ESL teaching skills, cross-cultural awareness and language skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 167-185.10.1080/09588221.2014.907320
  3. 3. Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81.
  4. 4. Belz, J. A. (2006). At the intersection of telecollaboration, learner corpus analysis, and L2 pragmatics: Considerations for language program direction. Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education, 207-246.
  5. 5. Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning (Vol. 3). Harvard University Press.
  6. 6. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  7. 7. Chen, J. J., & Yang, S. C. (2016). Promoting cross-cultural understanding and language use in research-oriented internet-mediated intercultural exchange. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 262-288.10.1080/09588221.2014.937441
  8. 8. Chun, D. M. (2011). Developing intercultural communicative competence through online exchanges. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 392.10.11139/cj.28.2.392-419
  9. 9. Çiftçi, E. Y., & Savaş, P. (2018). The role of telecollaboration in language and intercultural learning: A synthesis of studies published between 2010 and 2015. ReCALL, 30(3), 278-298.10.1017/S0958344017000313
  10. 10. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. DC Heath.
  11. 11. Dewey, J. (1998). Experience and education: The 60th anniversary edition. Kappa Delta Pi.
  12. 12. Gómez, M. V. G. (2019). Developing Soft Skills in Higher Education Foreign Language Programs. Initial Insights into Telecollaboration. In Teaching Language and Teaching Literature in Virtual Environments (pp. 151-162). Springer, Singapore.
  13. 13. Guth, S., & Marini-Maio, N. (2010). Close encounters of a new kind: The use of Skype and Wiki in telecollaboration. Telecollaboration, 2, 413-426.
  14. 14. Harris, J. (2000). Taboo Topic No Longer: Why Telecollaborative Projects Sometimes Fail. Learning & Leading with Technology, 27(5), 58.
  15. 15. Helm, F., & Guth, S. (2010). The multifarious goals of telecollaboration 2.0: Theoretical and practical implications. In F. Helm & S. Guth (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0: Language Literacies and Intercultural Learning in the 21st Century (pp.69-106).
  16. 16. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34-37.
  17. 17. Lee, L., & Markey, A. (2014). A study of learners’ perceptions of online intercultural exchange through Web 2.0 technologies. ReCALL, 26(3), 281-297.10.1017/S0958344014000111
  18. 18. Levy, M., & Kennedy, C. (2004). A Task-Cycling Pedagogy Using Stimulated Reflection and Audio-Conferencing in Foreign Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 50-68.
  19. 19. Liaw, M. L., & Bunn-Le Master, S. (2010). Understanding telecollaboration through an analysis of intercultural discourse. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 21-40.10.1080/09588220903467301
  20. 20. McCloskey, E. M. (2012). Global teachers: A conceptual model for building teachers’ intercultural competence Online [Docentes globales: un modelo conceptual para el desarrollo de la competencia intercultural on-line]. Comunicar, 38, 41–49.10.3916/C38-2012-02-04
  21. 21. Michell, H. (2011). A critical analysis of the effects of a videoconferencing project on pupils’ learning about culture and language. Journal of Trainee Teacher Education Research, 2, 51-88.
  22. 22. O’Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with ‘failed communication’ in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 623-642.10.1558/cj.v23i3.623-642
  23. 23. Piaget. J. (1970). Structuralism. New York: Basic Books.
  24. 24. Schenker, T. (2012). Intercultural competence and cultural learning through telecollaboration. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 449.10.11139/cj.29.3.449-470
  25. 25. Thorne, S. L. (2006). Pedagogical and praxiological lessons from internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education research. Internet-mediated Intercultural Foreign Language Education, 2-30.
  26. 26. Vorobel, O., & Kim, D. (2012). Language teaching at a distance: An overview of research. Calico Journal, 29(3), 548.10.11139/cj.29.3.548-562
  27. 27. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. London: Harvard University Press.
  28. 28. Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190-205.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00274.x
  29. 29. Ware, P. D., & O’Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 43-63.
Language: English
Page range: 87 - 97
Published on: Jan 24, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Ayse Taskiran, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.