Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Examining Faculty Readiness to Teach Online: A Comparison of US and German Educators Cover

Examining Faculty Readiness to Teach Online: A Comparison of US and German Educators

Open Access
|Jan 2020

References

  1. 1. Al-Azawei, A.; Parslow, P. & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Barriers and Opportunities of E-Learning Implementation in Iraq: A Case of Public Universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 126-146.10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2501
  2. 2. Ali, R., & Leeds, E. M. (2009). The impact of face-to-face orientation on online retention: A pilot study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(4).
  3. 3. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
  4. 4. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
  5. 5. Anderson, C. (2012). Barriers and enabler to teachers’ adoption of online teaching at an Australian University. Dissertation RMIT University. Retrieved from https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:160215
  6. 6. Aydin, C. (2005). Turkish mentors’ perception of roles, competencies and resources for online teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 6(3). Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/makale_goster.php?id=208 /
  7. 7. Bacow, L. S., Bowen, G. B., Guthrie, K. M., Lack, K. A., & Long, M. P. (2012). Barriers to Adoption of Online Learning Systems in U.S. Higher Education. New York: Ithaka.
  8. 8. Badiee, F., & Kaufman, D. (2015). Design Evaluation of a Simulation for Teacher Education. SAGE Open, 5(2). doi:10.1177/215824401559245410.1177/2158244015592454
  9. 9. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  10. 10. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  11. 11. Baran, E. (2011). The transformation of online teaching practice: Tracing successful online teaching in higher education. Dissertation Iowa State University.
  12. 12. Bawane, J., & Spector, J. (2009). Prioritization of online instructor roles: Implications for competency-based teacher education programs. Distance Education, 30(3), 383–397. doi:10.1080/0158791090323653610.1080/01587910903236536
  13. 13. Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance Education Trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2). doi:10.1080/0158791060078949810.1080/01587910600789498
  14. 14. Bigatel, P. M., Ragan, L. C., Kennan, S., May, J., & Redmond, B. F. (2012). The identification of competencies for online teaching success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(1), 59-77.10.24059/olj.v16i1.215
  15. 15. Billings, D. M. (1988). A conceptual model of correspondence course completion. American Journal of Distance Education, 2(2), 23-35.10.1080/08923648809526621
  16. 16. Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2013). The influence of asynchronous video communication on learner social presence: a narrative analysis of four cases. Distance Education, 34(1), 48–63.10.1080/01587919.2013.770427
  17. 17. Bozarth, J., Chapman, D., & LaMonica, L. (2004). Preparing for Distance Learning: Designing an Online Student Orientation Course. Educational Technology & Society, 7(1).
  18. 18. Brindley, J., Blaschke, L. M., & Walti, C. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3).10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.675
  19. 19. Cavanaugh, J. (2005). Teaching online: A time comparison. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring81/cavanaugh81.htm
  20. 20. Chi, A. (2015). Development of the readiness to teach online scale. Master’s Thesis. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/1018/
  21. 21. Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2013). Collaborative learning using VoiceThread in an online graduate course. Knowledge Management & ELearning, 5(3), 298–314.
  22. 22. Chyung, S. Y. Y. (2007). Age and gender differences in online behavior, self-efficacy, and academic performance. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 213.
  23. 23. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  24. 24. Coomey, M., & Stephenson, J. (2001). Online learning: It is all about dialogue, involvement, support, and control - according to the research. In J. Stephenson (Ed.), Teaching and learning online, pedagogies for new technologies (pp. 37-53). Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.
  25. 25. Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320–334.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x
  26. 26. Correa, T. (2010). The participation divide among “online experts”: Experience, skills, and psychological factors as predictors of college students’ web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 71–92.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01532.x
  27. 27. Cuthrell, K. & Lyon, A. (2007). Instructional strategies: What do online students prefer? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol3no4/cuthrell.htm
  28. 28. Dahlstrom, E.; Brooks, D. C., & Bichsel, J. (2014). The Current Ecosystem of Learning Management Systems in Higher Education: Student, Faculty, and IT Perspectives. Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR.
  29. 29. Denis, B., Watland, P., Pirotte, S., & Verday, N. (2004). Roles and competencies of the e-tutor. Proceedings of Networked Learning Competence 2004.
  30. 30. Dennen, V. P., Aubteen Darabi, A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor–learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance education, 28(1), 65-79.10.1080/01587910701305319
  31. 31. Downing, J. J., & Dyment, J. E. (2013). Teacher Educators’ Readiness, Preparation, and Perceptions of Preparing Preservice Teachers in a Fully Online Environment: An Exploratory Study. The Teacher Educator, 48(2), 96-109. doi: 10.1080/08878730.2012.76002310.1080/08878730.2012.760023
  32. 32. Draus, P., Curran, M., & Trempus, M. (2014). The Influence of Instructor-Generated Video Content on Student Satisfaction with and Engagement in Asynchronous Online Classes. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2).
  33. 33. Fusani, D. S. (1994). “Extra-class” communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside the classroom.10.1080/00909889409365400
  34. 34. Gay, G. (2016). An assessment of online instructor e-learning readiness before, during, and after course delivery. Journal of Computer in Higher Education, 2016(28), 199–220.10.1007/s12528-016-9115-z
  35. 35. Geddes, D. (2009). How Am I Doing? Exploring On-Line Gradebook Monitoring as a Self-Regulated Learning Practice That Impacts Academic Achievement. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 494-510. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759188
  36. 36. Griffiths, M., & Graham, C. (2009). The Potential of Asynchronous Video in Online Education. Distance Learning, 6(2).
  37. 37. Guasch, T., Alvarez, I., & Espasa, A. (2010). University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching/learning environment: Analysis of a teacher training experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.01810.1016/j.tate.2009.02.018
  38. 38. Horvitz, B. S., Beach, A. L., Anderson, M. L., & Xia, J. (2015). Examination of faculty self-efficacy related to online teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 305-316.10.1007/s10755-014-9316-1
  39. 39. Johnson, S. G., & Berge, Z. (2012). Online education in the community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(11), 897-902.10.1080/10668920903323948
  40. 40. Jokiaho, A. & May, B. (2017). Hindernisse für die Nutzung von E-Learning an Hochschulen: Aktueller Forschungsstand. In C. Igel (Ed.), Bildungsräume (pp..20-31). Münster: Waxmann.
  41. 41. Keramati, A., Afshari-Mofrad, M., & Kamrani, A. (2011). The Role of Readiness Factors in E-Learning Outcomes: An Empirical Study. Computers & Education, 57(3). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.00510.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.005
  42. 42. Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2010). Teaching Online – A Practical Guide. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203855201
  43. 43. Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50.10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
  44. 44. Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research methods, 9, 202-220.10.1177/1094428105284919
  45. 45. Lichoro, D. M. (2015). Faculty preparedness for transition to teaching online courses in the Iowa Community College Online Consortium. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 14376.
  46. 46. Loewenthal, K. M. (2004). An introduction to psychological tests and scales (2nd ed.). Hove, U. K.: Psychology Press.
  47. 47. Nadler, M., & Nadler, L. (1995, November). The roles of empathy, credibility, and sex in out of class communication between faculty and students. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
  48. 48. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  49. 49. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2011). The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development. John Wiley & Sons.
  50. 50. Pajares, F. (2009). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 111-139). New York, NY: Routledge.
  51. 51. Pennsylvania State University (2016). Faculty Self-Assessment: Preparing for Online Teaching.
  52. 52. Pollanen, M. (2007). Improving learner motivation with online assignments. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 203-213.
  53. 53. Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72-89.10.1080/08923640802039024
  54. 54. Reis, L., Ikari, O., Taha-Neto, K., Gugliotta, A., & Denardi, F. (2015). Delivery of a urology online course using Moodle versus didactic lectures methods. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(2). doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.11.00110.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.11.001
  55. 55. Randall, F. A. (2001). Factor Analysis of Online Instruction Self-Efficacy Using the Tennessee Online Instruction Survey. PhD diss., University of Tennessee. Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2649
  56. 56. Rangecroft, M., Gilroy, P., Tricker, T., & Long, P. (2002). Gathering and using quality-of-student experience data on distance education courses. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 75-83.
  57. 57. Roach, K. D., & Byrne, P. R. (2001). A cross-cultural comparison of instructor communication in American and German classrooms. Communication Education, 50(1), 1-14.10.1080/03634520109379228
  58. 58. Robinia, K. A., & Anderson, M. L. (2010). Online teaching efficacy of nurse faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 26(3), 168-175.10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.02.006
  59. 59. Rollnick, S., Mason, P., & Butler, C. C. (2010). Health Behavior Change E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
  60. 60. Rovai, A. (2003). In Search of Higher Persistence Rates in Distance Education Online Programs. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1). doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-610.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-6
  61. 61. Schleef, E. (2009). A cross-cultural investigation of German and American academic style. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1104-1124.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.01.002
  62. 62. Schmid, U., Goertz, L., Radomski, S., Thom, S., & Behrens, J. (2017). Monitor Digitale Bildung – Die Hochschulen im digitalen Zeitalter. Retrieved December 12, 2017, from https://www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/DigiMonitor_Hochschulen_final.pdf
  63. 63. Shea, P. (2007). Bridges and Barriers to Teaching Online College Courses: A Study of Experienced Online Faculty in Thirty-Six Colleges. Online Learning Consortium, 11(2), 73-128.
  64. 64. Sheridan, K., & Kelly, M. (2010). The Indicators of Instructor Presence that are Important to Students in Online Courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4).
  65. 65. Shi, M., Bonk, C. & Magjuka, R. (2006). Time management strategies for online teaching. International Journal for Technology and Distance Learning, 3(2). Retrieved March, 27, 2013 from http://itdl.org/journal/feb_06/article01.htm
  66. 66. Shie, R., Gummer, E., & Niess, M. (2008). The quality of a web based course: perspectives of the instructor in the students. TechTrends, 52(6), 61-68.10.1007/s11528-008-0220-3
  67. 67. Spector, J. M., & De la Teja, I. (2001). Competencies for online teaching. ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology, Syracuse University.
  68. 68. Steinhardt, I. (2015). Lehre stärkt Forschung: Studiengangentwicklung durch ProfessorInnen im Handlungssystem Universität. Springer-Verlag.
  69. 69. Tallent-Runnels, M., Thomas, J., Lan, W., Cooper, S, Ahern, S., & Xiaoming L. (2016).Teaching Courses Online: A Review of Research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), pp. 93-135.
  70. 70. Thiele, J. (2003). Learning patterns on online students, Journal of Nursing Education, 42(8), 364-367.10.3928/0148-4834-20030801-08
  71. 71. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.10.3102/00346543068002202
  72. 72. University of Toledo (2016). Faculty Online Teaching Readiness Survey. Retrieved online from https://www.utdl.edu/lv/assessments/faculty_readiness.html
Language: English
Page range: 53 - 69
Published on: Jan 24, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Florence Martin, Chuang Wang, Annika Jokiaho, Birgit May, Sonja Grübmeyer, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.