Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Social Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, a Sustainable Practice for Social and Economic Cohesion in Rural Areas: The Case of the Czech Republic Cover

Social Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, a Sustainable Practice for Social and Economic Cohesion in Rural Areas: The Case of the Czech Republic

European Countryside
Volume 10 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)
By:
Open Access
|Oct 2018

References

  1. [1] Anheier, H. K. (2005). <em>Nonprofit Organizations. Theory, Management, Policy</em>. London, New York: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Beck, S. E. &amp; Manuel, K. (2008). <em>Practical research methods for librarians and information professionals</em>. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Bock, B. B. &amp; Oosting, S. J. (2010). A classification of green care arrangements in Europe. In Dessein, J. &amp; Bock, B. B., eds., <em>The Economics of Green Care in Agriculture</em> (pp. 15–26). Loughborough University.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Bohátová, Z., Schwarcz, P., Schwarczová, L., Bandlerová, A. &amp; Tľčik, A. (2016). Multifunctionality – Interactions and Implications: The Case of the Podkylava Village (Western Slovakia). <em>European Countryside</em> 8(2), 147–159. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2016-0012." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/euco-2016-0012.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2016-0012" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/euco-2016-0012</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Coffey, A. &amp; Atkinson, P. (1996). Narratives and stories. In <em>Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies</em> (pp. 54–82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Dees, J. G., Emerson, J. et al. (2001). <em>Enterprising Nonprofits. A Toolkit for Social Entrepreneurs</em>. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Defourny, J. (2001). From the Third Sector to Social Enterprise. In Borzaga, C. &amp; Defourny, J. <em>The Emergence of Social Enterprise</em> (pp. 17–31). London and New York. Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Defourny, J. &amp; Nyssens, M. (2014). The EMES Approach of Social Enterprise in a Comparative Perspective. In Defourny, J., Hulgård, L &amp; Pestoff, V., eds. <em>Social Enterprise and the Third Sector: Changing European Landscapes in a Comparative Perspective</em> (pp. 42–65). London and New York: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Defourny, J. (2014). From Third Sector to Social Enterprise. A European Research Trajectory. In Defourny, J., Hulgård, L. &amp; Pestoff, V., eds. <em>Social Enterprise and the Third Sector: Changing European Landscapes in a Comparative Perspective</em> (pp. 17–41). London and New York: Routledge.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487747" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4324/9780203487747</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Di Iacovo, F. &amp; O’Connor, D., eds. (2009). <em>Supporting Policies for Social Farming in Europe. Progressing Multifunctionality in Responsive Rural Areas</em>. ARSIA: Firenze.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Dohnalová, M., Deverová, L., Legnerová, K. &amp; Pospíšilová, T. (2015). <em>Lidské zdroje v sociálních podnicích</em>. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, ČR, a.s.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Dohnalová, M. &amp; Průša, L. (2011). <em>Sociální ekonomika</em>. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, a.s.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Etzioni, A. (1995). <em>Morální dimenze ekonomiky</em>. Praha: Victoria Publishing, a.s.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Gordon, M. (2015). <em>A Typology of Social Enterprise ‘Traditions’</em> [ICSEM Working Papers, No. 18]. University of Liege.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise. <em>The Yale Law Journal</em> 89(5), 835– 901. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/796089." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/796089.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/796089" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/796089</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Hassing, J., Hulsing, W. &amp; Grin, J. (2014). Farming with Care: the evolution of care farming in the Netherlands. <em>NJAS</em> – <em>Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences</em>. 68, 1–11. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2013.11.001." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.njas.2013.11.001.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2013.11.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.njas.2013.11.001</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Hassink, J. &amp; van Dijk, M., eds. (2006). <em>Farming for Health: Green Care-farming across Europe and the United States of America</em>. Dordrecht: Springer.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4541-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/1-4020-4541-7</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Haubenhofer, D., Enzenhofer, K., Kleber, S., Pflugl, S., Plitzka, E. &amp; Holzapfel, I. (2013). <em>Zahradní terapie. Teorie – věda – praxe</em>. Brno: Lipka.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Hine, R., Peacock, J. &amp; Pretty, J. (2008b). Care Farming in the UK: Contexts, benefits and links with therapeutic communities. <em>Therapeutic Communities</em>. 29(3), 245–260.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Hudcová, E. (2016a). Tematizace a konceptualizace sociálního zemědělství ve vztahu k sociálnímu podnikání, multifunkčnímu zemědělství a přístupům „green care” v České republice. <em>FÓRUM sociální politiky</em>. 10(5), 20–23.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Hulgård, L. (2007). Differences between American and European Conceptions of Social Entrepreneurship. In Defourny, J., Hulgård, L. &amp; Pestoff, V., eds. (2014). <em>Social Enterprise and the third sector. Changing European Landscapes in a Comparative Perspective</em> (pp. 66–84). New York, Abingdon: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Chovanec, T., Hudcová, E. &amp; Moudrý, J. (2015). <em>Sociální zemědělství, představení konceptu</em>. Praha: Ministerstvo zemědělství ČR.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Kaplan, R. &amp; Kaplan, S. (1989). <em>The experience of nature – a psychological perspective</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Lafranchi, M., Giannetto, C., Abbate, T. &amp; Dimitrova, V. (2015). Agriculture and the social farm: Expression of the multifunctional model of agriculture as a solution to the economic crisis in rural areas. <em>Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Sciences</em>, 21(4), 711–718.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Laville, J.-L., Young, D. R. &amp; Eynaud, P. (2015). <em>Civil society, the Third sector and Social Enterprise</em>. London and New York: Routledge.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315795317" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4324/9781315795317</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Concepts and Evidence. <em>VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations</em>. 23(4), 1102–1118. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Ploeg, J. D. &amp; Roep, D. (2003). Multifunctionality and rural development: the actual situation in Europe. In Huylenbroeck, G. van &amp; Gilbert, D. <em>Multifunctional Agriculture; A new paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development</em> (pp. 37–53). Farnham: Ashgate.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Polanyi, K. (2002). <em>The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time</em>, 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. Boston: Beacon Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Randall, A. (2002). Valuing the outputs of multifunctional agriculture. <em>European Review of Agricultural Economics</em>. 29(3), 289–307. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/eurrag/29.3.289." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/eurrag/29.3.289.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/eurrag/29.3.289" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/eurrag/29.3.289</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Sempik, J., Hine, R. &amp; Wilcox, D., eds. (2010). <em>Green Care: A Conceptual Framework.</em> Loughborough University.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Schreier, M. (2012). <em>Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice</em>. Los Angeles, London, New York, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). <em>The Theory of Economic Development: An Enquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interests, and the Business Cycle</em>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Soukup, M. (2014). <em>Terénní výzkum v sociální a kulturní antropologii</em>. Praha: Karolinum.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Taylor, R., ed. (2010). <em>Third Sector Research</em>. New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer Sicence+Business Media.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5707-8" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/978-1-4419-5707-8</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Ujj, A., ed. (2017). <em>Social farming Best Practice Collection in Visegrad Countries</em>. Gödöllő: Szent István Egyetem.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Ulrich, E. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Altman, I. &amp; Wohlwill, J. F., eds. (1983). <em>Behaviour and the natural environment</em> (pp. 85–125), Boston, MA: Springer. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Weisbrod, B. A. (1975). <em>Toward a Theory of the Voluntary Non-profit Sector in a Three-sector Economy</em>. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Wilson, E. O. (1984). <em>Biophilia. The human bond with other species</em>. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674045231" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4159/9780674045231</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Wilson, G. A. (2007). <em>Multifunctional agriculture: A transition theory perspective</em>. Cambridge, MA: CABI. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00580.x." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00580.x.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00580.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00580.x</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Yin, R. K. (2009). <em>Case study research: design and methods</em>. Los Angeles: Sage.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Young, D. R. (1981). Entrepreneurship and the behaviour of nonprofit organisations: Elements of a theory. In White, M., ed., <em>Nonprofit firms in a three-sector economy</em>. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Act no 108/2006 Coll., on social services.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Act no. 252/1997 Coll., on agriculture.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Act no. 90/2012 Coll., on corporations.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Borzaga, C. &amp; Galera, G. (2004). <em>Social Economy in Transition Economies: Realities and Perspectives</em> [unpublished discussion paper presented at the First Meeting of the Scientific Group on Social Economy and Social Innovation of the OECD Centre for Local Development. Trento, Italy.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] EESC (2012). Social farming: green care and social and health policies: Brussels: EESC.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] FAO (2015). „The Implications of Social Farming for Rural Poverty Reduction”. Technical Workshop. Final Report, Rome. Gordon, M. (2015). „A Typology of Social Enterprise ‘Traditions’”. ICSEM Working Papers, No. 18. Liege: The International Comparative Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] Hine, R., Peacock, J. &amp; Pretty, J. (2008a). „Care Farming in the UK: a Scoping Study”. Report for the National Care Farming Initiative. University of Essex, Colchester.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] Hudcová, E. (2016b). Social entrepreneurship in agriculture and its implications for new subject matters in educational curriculum. In Valenčík, R., ed., <em>Human Capital and Investment in Education</em>, (pp. 43–51). Praha: University of Finance and Adminitration.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] OECD (2010). Regional Typology. 2010. Dostupné z: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/42392595.pdf">http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/42392595.pdf</ext-link>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. [51] TESSEA Network (2011). Definice a principy sociálního podniku. Retrieved 2017-12-11 from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.tessea.cz/tessea-o-nas/definice-a-principy-socialniho-podnikani">http://www.tessea.cz/tessea-o-nas/definice-a-principy-socialniho-podnikani</ext-link>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. [52] Vyhodnocení dotazníkového šetření sociálních podniků v ČR, 2015 (2015). Retrieved 2017-12-10 from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.ceske-socialni-podnikani.cz/images/pdf/Socialni_podniky_setreni_2015.pdf">http://www.ceske-socialni-podnikani.cz/images/pdf/Socialni_podniky_setreni_2015.pdf</ext-link>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-0022 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 377 - 397
Submitted on: Jan 17, 2018
Accepted on: May 18, 2018
Published on: Oct 16, 2018
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
rural areas,
rural development,
social entrepreneurship,
social farming,
social farm,
social integration
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2018 Eliška Hudcová, Tomáš Chovanec, Jan Moudrý, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 10 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)Next article