Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Provision of Public Services in the Light of Current Global Trends Cover

Provision of Public Services in the Light of Current Global Trends

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. 1. BERKHOUT, F. 2005. Rationales for adaptation in EU climate change policies. In Climate Policy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 377–391.10.1080/14693062.2005.9685564
  2. 2. BIESBROEK, G. R. – SWART, R. J. – CARTER, T. R. – COWAN, C., HENRICHS, T. – MELA, H. – MORECROFT, M. D. – REY, D. 2010. Europe adapts to climate change: Comparing National Adaptation Strategies. In Global Environmental Change, vol. 20, pp. 440–450. DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005
  3. 3. BOSSAERT, D. – DEMMKE, CH. – MOILANEN, T. 2012. The impact of demographic change and its challenges for the workforce in the European public sectors – Three priority areas to invest in future HRM. EIPA Working paper 2012/W/01. [Online]. [Cited 12.1.2017]. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/39385/.
  4. 4. BOSSE, J. – BURNETT, M. – MØLLER NIELSEN, S. – RONGIONE, C. – SCHOLTENS, H. 2015. The Public Sector as Partner for a Better Society. [Online]. [Cited 29.11.2017]. Available at: https://www.eipa.eu/wp–content/uploads/2017/10/PublicSectorAsPartnerForABetterSociety.pdf.
  5. 5. BOVAIRD, T., LOEFFLER, E. 2016 (b). The changing context of public policy. In BOVAIRD, T., LOEFFLER, E. (eds.) Public Management and Governance. New York: Routledge, pp. 14–25. ISBN 978–0–415–50186–6.
  6. 6. BURCH, S. 2010. Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: Insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. In Global Environmental Change, vol. 20, no. 2., pp. 287–297. DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.009.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.009
  7. 7. GAPGEMINI. 2018. Agriculture. [Online]. [Cited 30.6.2017]. Available at: https://www.capgemini.com/industry/agriculture/
  8. 8. CLEGG, S. 2007. Something is happening here, but you don’t know what it is, do you, Mister Jones? ICT in the contemporary world. Information Systems and Innovation Group, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  9. 9. CORDELLA, A. – BONINA, C. M. 2012. A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. In Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29, pp. 512–520. DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004.10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004
  10. 10. CORDELLA, A. – TEMPINI, N. 2015. E–government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. In Government Information Quarterly. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005.10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005
  11. 11. EMI (EUROPEAN MOVEMENT INTERNATIONAL). n. a. Public sector workers in Europe facing the new challenges of migration. [Online]. [Cited 27.10.2017]. Available at: http://europeanmovement.eu/event/public–sector–workers–in–europe–facing–the–new–challenges–of–migration/.
  12. 12. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2016. Urban Agenda for the EU – Pact of Amsterdam. [Online]. [Cited 29.11.2017]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/pact–of–amsterdam_en.pdf.
  13. 13. GATAUTIS, R. 2008. The Impact of ICT on Public and Private Sectors in Lithuania. In Engineering Economics, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 18–28. ISSN 1392 – 2785.
  14. 14. JUHOLA, S. – WESTERHOFF, L. 2011. Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: a case study of network governance in two European countries. In Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 14, pp. 239–247. DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.006.10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.006
  15. 15. KATZ, R. – KOUTROUMPIS, P. – CALLORDA, F. M. 2014. Using a digitalization index to measure the economics and social impact of digital agendas. In Info, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 32–44. DOI 10.1108/info–10–2013–0051.10.1108/info1020130051
  16. 16. KOUZMIN, A. – LOFFLER, E. – KLAGES, H. – KORAC–KAKABADSE, N. 1999. Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors. In International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 121–144.10.1108/09513559910263462
  17. 17. LAUKKONEN, J. – BLANCO, P. K. – LENHART, J. – KEINER, M. – CAVRIC, B. – KINUTHIA–NJENGA, C. 2009. Combining climate change adaptation and mitigation measures at the local level. In Habitat International, vol. 33, pp. 287–292. DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.003.10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.003
  18. 18. LETHBRIDGE, J. 2016. Overview of global megatrends affecting local and regional governments. Report for Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU). [Online]. [Cited 29.11.2017]. Available at: http://www.world–psi.org/en/overview–global–megatrends–affecting–local–and–regional–governments.
  19. 19. NIANG–DIOP, I. – BOSCH, H. 2004. Formulating an adaptation strategy. In LIM, B., SPANGER–SIEGFRIED, E., HUQ, S., MALONE, E.L., BURTON, I. (Eds.). Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change: Developing Strategies, Policies and Measures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–204. ISBN 0 521 61760 X.
  20. 20. NOGUEIRA. R. M. 2006. New roles of the public sector for an agriculture for development agenda. Background Paper for the World Development Report 2008. [Online]. [Cited 12.1.2017]. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDRS/Resources/477365–1327599046334/8394679–1327599874257/MartinezNogueira_NewRolesOfPublic.pdf
  21. 21. POTTS, J. – KASTELLE, T. 2010. Public sector innovation research: What’s next? In Innovation: management, policy & practice, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 122–137.10.5172/impp.12.2.122
  22. 22. PWC. 2015. State–Owned Enterprises – Catalysts for public value creation? [Online]. [Cited 30.6.2017]. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/psrc/publications/assets/pwc–state–owned–enterprise–psrc.pdf.
  23. 23. SHOCKLEY, G. – STOUGH, R. – HAYNES, K. – FRANK, P. 2006. Toward a theory of public sector entrepreneurship. In International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 205–223.10.1504/IJEIM.2006.009875
  24. 24. TREIB, O. – BÄHR, H. – FALKNER, G. – 2007. Modes of governance: towards conceptual clarification. In Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–20. DOI 10.1080/135017606061071406.10.1080/135017606061071406
  25. 25. United Nations Organization. 2016. New Urban Agenda. [Online]. [Cited 12.1.2017]. Available at: http://www.telecom.gov.sk/index/index.php?ids=209315.
  26. 26. WOLF, D. A. – AMIRKHANYAN, A. A. 2010. Demographic Change and Its Public Sector Consequences. In Public Administration Review, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 12–23. DOI 10.1111/j.1540–6210.2010.02242.x.10.1111/j.15406210.2010.02242.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eual-2018-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1339-9276 | Journal ISSN: 1338-6891
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 14
Published on: Dec 31, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Monika Bumbalová, published by Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.