Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Differences in Defining the Virtual and Traditional Teams Cover
Open Access
|Jul 2022

References

  1. 1. Adair, W.L., Buchan, N.R., Chen, X.-P., Liu, D. (2016). A model of communication context and measure of context dependence, Academy of Management Discoveries, 2(2), 198-217. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2014.0018
  2. 2. Allen, T.D., Golden, T.D., Shockley, K.M. (2015). How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/152910061559327326403188
  3. 3. Barnwell, D., Nedrick, S., Rudolph, E., Sesay, M., Wellen, W. (2014). Leadership of international and virtual project teams. International Journal of Global Business, 7(2), 1–8.
  4. 4. Bhalla, V., Dyrchs, S., Strack, R. (2017). Twelve Forces that will Radically Change How Organizations Work. The Boston Consulting Group. Downloaded from: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2017/people-organization-strategy-twelve-forces-radically-change-organizations-work.aspx
  5. 5. Bourgault, M., Drouin, N., Hamel, É. (2008). Decision-making within distributed project teams: an exploration of formalization and autonomy as determinants of success. Paper presented at PMI® Research Conference: Defining the Future of Project Management, Warsaw, Poland. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  6. 6. Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., Hertel, G. (2016). Does Trust Matter More in Virtual Teams? A Meta-Analysis of Trust and Team Effectiveness Considering Virtuality and Documentation as Moderators. The Journal of applied psychology. https://doi:10.1037/apl000011310.1037/apl000011327228105
  7. 7. Build Remote (2021). Every Company Going Remote Permanently. Downloaded from: https://buildremote.co/companies/companies-going-remote-permanently/ (accessed: 2021.20.03)
  8. 8. Bulinska-Stangrecka, H., Bagienska, A. (2021). The Role of Employee Relations in Shaping Job Satisfaction as an Element Promoting Positive Mental Health at Work in the Era of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041903792027233669365
  9. 9. Castellano, S., Davidson, P., Khelladi, I. (2016). Creativity techniques to enhance knowledge transfer within global virtual teams in the context of knowledge-intensive enterprises. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 253-266.10.1007/s10961-016-9509-0
  10. 10. Duran, V., Popescu, A.-D. (2014). The challenge of multicultural communication in virtual teams. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 365 – 369.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.473
  11. 11. Fu, M., Kelly, J., Clinch, J. P., King, F. (2012). Environmental policy implications of working from home: Modelling the impacts of land-use, infrastructure and socio-demographics. Energy Policy. 47, 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.014
  12. 12. Gheni, A.Y., Jusoh, Y.Y., Jabar, M.A., Ali, N.M., Abdullah, R.Hj., Abdullah S., Khalefa M.S. (2015). The Virtual Teams: E-leaders Challenges, IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services. Melaka. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3e.2015.7403483
  13. 13. Gibson, C. B., Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality?: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation Author(s): Cristina B. Gibson and Jennifer L. Gibbs Published by: Sage Publications, 51(3), 451–495.10.2189/asqu.51.3.451
  14. 14. Gilson L.L., Maynard, M.T., Jones Young, N.C., Vartiainen, M., Hakonen M. (2014). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313-1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946
  15. 15. Glikson, E., Erez, M. (2020). The emergence of a communication climate in global virtual teams. Journal of World Business, 55(6), ISSN 1090-9516,.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101001.
  16. 16. Global Workplace Analytics (2020). Downloaded from: https://globalworkplaceanalytics.com/telecommuting-statistics (access: 2021.30.03).
  17. 17. Grenny, J., Maxfield, D. (2017). A study of 1100 employees found that remote workers feel shunned and left out. Harvard Business Review, Downloaded from: https://hbsp.harvard.edu/aece0f82-a45b-49ad-9482-0d2703e2dcf2 (accessed: 2021.15.04)
  18. 18. Grözinger, N. Irlenbusch, B., Laske, K., Schröder, M. (2020). Innovation and communication media in virtual teams – An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 201-218, ISSN 0167-2681, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.09.009.
  19. 19. Haas, M. R. (2006). Acquiring and applying knowledge in transnational teams: The roles of cosmopolitans and locals. Organization Science, 17(3), 367-384.10.1287/orsc.1060.0187
  20. 20. Henry, J.E., Hartzler, M. (1998). Tools for Virtual Teams: A Team Fitness Companion.10.1097/01445442-199809000-00012
  21. 21. Hoch, J. E., Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390.10.1037/a003026423205494
  22. 22. Dulebohn, J. H., Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 569-574.10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.004
  23. 23. Jimenez, A., Boehe, D.M., Taras, V., Caprar, D.V. (2017). Working Across Boundaries: Current and Future Perspectives on Global Virtual Teams. Journal of International Management, 23(4), 341-349, ISSN 1075-4253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2017.05.001
  24. 24. Khan, M. S., Khan, I., Din, S., Ismail, H.M, Khattak, R., Jan, R. (2015). The Impacts of ICT on the Students’ Performance: A Review of Access to Information. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences 5(1), 85-94.
  25. 25. Killingsworth, B., Xue, Y., Liu, Y. (2016). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among global virtual teams. Team Performance Management, 22(5/6), 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10-2015-0042
  26. 26. Klitmøller, A., Schneider, S.C., Jonsen, K. (2015). Speaking of global virtual teams: language differences, social categorization and media choice. Personnel Review, 44(2), 270-285. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2013-0205
  27. 27. Krawczyk-Bryłka B. (2017). Comparative Study of Traditional and Virtual Teams. Task quarterly, 21(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.17466/tq2017/21.3/o
  28. 28. Manning, S., Larsen, M., Bharati, P. (2015). Global delivery models: The role of talent, speed and time zones in the global outsourcing industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(7): 850-877.
  29. 29. Martinsons, M., Davison, R. (2007). Strategic decision making and support systems: Comparing American, Japanese and Chinese management. Decision Support Systems, 43, 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.10.005
  30. 30. Maynard M.T., Gilson L.L. (2014). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness, Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 3-3210.1177/1059601113475361
  31. 31. Nordbäck, E. S. Espinosa, J. A. (2019). Effective Coordination of Shared Leadership in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(1), 321-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1558943
  32. 32. Nurmi, N., Hinds, P. (2016). Job complexity and learning opportunities: A silver lining in the design of global virtual work. Journal International Business Study, 47, 631–654. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.11
  33. 33. Piccoli, G., Powell, A., Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: Team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness. Information Technology & People, 17(4), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840410570258
  34. 34. Plenkina V., Andronova I., Deberdieva E., Lenkova O., Osinovskaya, I. (2018). Specifics of strategic managerial decisions-making in Russian oil companies. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 5(4): 858-874. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.4(11)10.9770/jesi.2018.5.4(11)
  35. 35. Presbitero A. (2020). Foreign language skill, anxiety, cultural intelligence and individual task performance in global virtual teams: A cognitive perspective. Journal of International Management, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2019.100729
  36. 36. Raghuram, S., Hill, N.S., Gibbs, J.L. & Maruping, L.M. (2018). Virtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters. Academy of Management Annals, 13. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0020
  37. 37. Répáczki, R., Juhász, M. (2010). Spreading of project and virtual teams in traditional organizational cultures. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 18(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.so.2010-2.04
  38. 38. Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information and Management, 45(2), 131-142.10.1016/j.im.2007.12.003
  39. 39. Shaik, F. F., Makhecha, U. P. (2019). Drivers of Employee Engagement in Global Virtual Teams. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v23i0.1770
  40. 40. Srilalitha, S. (2015). ‘Ringi System’ The Decision Making Process in Japanese Management Systems: An Overview. International Journal of Management and Humanities, 1(7). ISSN: 2394-0913, Downloaded from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2597083 (accessed: 2021.11.04)
  41. 41. Snellman C. L. (2014). Virtual teams: opportunities and challenges for e-leaders. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1251-1261.
  42. 42. Schmidt, J. B., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P. (2001). New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 575–600.10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00973.x
  43. 43. Smite, D., Kuhrmann, M., Keil, P. (2014) Virtual Teams [Guest editors’ introduction]. IEEE Software, 31(6), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2014.149
  44. 44. Tworoger, L. C., Ruppel, C. P., Gong, B., Pohlman, R. A. (2013). Leadership constraints: Leading global virtual teams through environmental complexity. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 9(2), 34–60.10.4018/jec.2013040102
  45. 45. Upwork. (2020). U.S. business hiring trends – Upwork future workforce report. Downloaded from: https://www.upwork.com/press/releases/economist-report-future-workforce (accessed: 2021.11.04)
  46. 46. Webster, J., Wong, W.K.P. (2008). Comparing traditional and virtual group forms: identity, communication and trust in naturally occurring project teams. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701763883
  47. 47. Wei, L.H., Thurasamy, R. Popa S. (2018). Managing virtual teams for open innovation in Global Business Services industry. Management Decision, 56(6), 1285-1305, Emerald Publishing Limited, 0025-1747. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2017-0766
  48. 48. Wildman, J.L., Griffith, R.L. (2015). Leading Global Teams Means Dealing with Different, Leading Global Teams: Translating Multidisciplinary Science to Practice, Springer, 13-32.10.1007/978-1-4939-2050-1
  49. 49. Williams, I.T. (1975). Decision-making process in Japan. Intereconomics 10, 247–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02929275
  50. 50. Zeuge, A., Oschinsky, F., Weigel, A., Schlechtinger, M., Niehaves, B. (2020). Leading Virtual Teams -A Literature Review.
  51. 51. Zimmermann A. (2011). Interpersonal relationships in transnational, virtual teams: Towards a configurational perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00284.x
  52. 52. Zuofa, T., & Ochieng, E.G. (2017). Working separately but together: appraising virtual project team challenges. Team Performance Management, 23(5/6), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-06-2016-0030
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2022-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2451-182X | Journal ISSN: 2083-3725
Language: English
Page range: 250 - 265
Submitted on: May 1, 2021
Accepted on: May 1, 2022
Published on: Jul 13, 2022
Published by: John Paul II University of Applied Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Yana Seliverstova, published by John Paul II University of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.