Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Understanding the sociodemographic component of urban shrinkage exemplified by mono-industrial towns in Latvia Cover

Understanding the sociodemographic component of urban shrinkage exemplified by mono-industrial towns in Latvia

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Andrusz G., Harloe M., Szelényi I. 1996. Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
  2. Brade I., Axenov K., Bondarchuk E. 2006. The transformation of urban space in post-Soviet Russia. Taylor & Francis, London.
  3. Cactus Communications. 2026. Paperpal (Version 4.31.6) [Computer software]. https://edit.paperpal.com
  4. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. 2024. Population census data. Official Statistics Portal. stat.gov.lv.
  5. Cinis A., Drėmaitė M., Kalm M. 2008. Perfect representations of Soviet planned space: Mono-industrial towns in the Soviet Baltic republics in the 1950s–1980s. Scandinavian Journal of History, 33, 3: 226–246.
  6. Crawford C. 2018. From tractors to territory: Socialist urbanization through standardization. Journal of Urban History, 44, 1: 54–77.
  7. Crowley S. 2016. Monotowns and the political economy of industrial restructuring in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32, 5: 397–422.
  8. Dijkstra L., Poelman H., Rodríguez-Pose A. 2020. The geography of EU discontent. Regional Studies, 54, 6: 737–753.
  9. Duarte A., Pascariu G. 2017. Core-periphery patterns across the European Union: Case studies and lessons from Eastern and Southern Europe. Emerald Publishing, Bingley.
  10. Dzenovska D. 2018. Emptiness and its futures: Staying and leaving as tactics of life in Latvia. Focaal, 80: 16–29.
  11. Grazuleviciute-Vileniske I., Urbonas V. 2014. Urban regeneration in the context of post-Soviet transformation: Lithuanian experience. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15, 6: 637–643.
  12. Gunko M., Kinossian N., Pivovar G., et al. 2021. Exploring agency of change in small industrial towns through urban renewal initiatives. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 103, 3: 218–234.
  13. Hincks S., Powell R. 2022. Territorial stigmatisation beyond the city: Habitus, affordances and landscapes of industrial ruination. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54, 7: 1391–1410.
  14. Krisjane, Z., Krumins, J., Dahs, A., Lece, K., Krumins, J. 2021. Innovations in the use of territorial and individual data in analysis of Latvia’s demographic development, 2011–2021. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences, 75, 4: 76–93.
  15. Kūle L. 2014. Urban–rural interactions in Latvian changing policy and practice context. European Planning Studies, 22, 4: 758–774.
  16. Lang T., Burneika D., Noorkõiv R., et al. 2022. Socio-spatial polarisation and policy response: Perspectives for regional development in the Baltic states. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29, 1:21–44.
  17. Lintz G., Müller B., Schmude K. 2007. The future of industrial cities and regions in Central and Eastern Europe. Geoforum, 38, 3: 512–519.
  18. Morris J. 2015. Notes on the “worthless dowry” of Soviet industrial modernity: Making working-class Russia habitable. Laboratorium. Russian Review of Social Research, 7, 3: 25–48.
  19. Musil J. 1993. Changing urban systems in post-communist societies in Central Europe: Analysis and prediction. Urban Studies, 30, 6: 899–905.
  20. Pike A., Rodríguez-Pose A., et al. 2017. Shifting horizons in local and regional development. Regional Studies, 51, 1: 46–57.
  21. Pociūtė-Sereikienė, G., Kriaučiūnas, E., Ubarevičienė, R. 2014. Peripheralisation trends in rural territories: the case of Lithuania. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 116, 3: 122–130.
  22. Rodríguez-Pose A. 2018. The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11, 1: 189–209.
  23. Rohner T. 2021. The second life of the Monotown: Questioning narratives of failed Soviet urban modernity in contemporary Kazakhstan. [in:] M. Schmidt (ed.), Beyond Post-Soviet: Layered Legacies and Transformations in Central Asia. 64–74.
  24. Round J., Williams C. 2010. Coping with the social costs of ’transition’: Everyday life in post-Soviet Russia and Ukraine. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17, 2: 183–196.
  25. Sgibnev W., Turaeva R. 2023. Mining cities in Central Asia and the South Caucasus: survival strategies under conditions of extreme peripheralisation. (Forum IfL, 43). Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde e.V. (IfL), Leipzig.
  26. Sýkora L., Bouzarovski S. 2012. Multiple transformations: Conceptualising the post-communist urban transition. Urban Studies, 49, 1: 43–60.
  27. Tsenkova S. 2006. Beyond transitions: Understanding urban change in post-socialist cities. [in:] The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe: Space and Representation in Post-Socialist Cities.
  28. Wolff M., Wiechmann T. 2018. Uneven urban dynamics: The role of urban shrinkage and regrowth in Europe. European Planning Studies, 26, 4: 718–740.
Language: English
Page range: 42 - 53
Submitted on: Mar 30, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 10, 2026
Published on: Sep 18, 2026
Published by: University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Natural Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Maris Berzins, Elina Apsite-Berina, Guido Sechi, Niks Stafeckis, published by University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Natural Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.