Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Behavioural mimicry or herd behaviour of Generation Z? Social media interactions in the context of information overload Cover

Behavioural mimicry or herd behaviour of Generation Z? Social media interactions in the context of information overload

Open Access
|Dec 2024

References

  1. Ahmad, S. (2023). Social Media and Herd Mentality. Online content activates brain circuitry in ways you need to understand. Psychology Today (updated 8 September 2023). Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/balanced/202309/social-media-and-herd-mentality
  2. Bamakan, S.M.H., Nurgaliev, I., & Qu, Q. (2019). Opinion leader detection: A methodological review, Expert Systems with Applications, 115, 200-222. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.069
  3. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication.  Media Psychology, 3, 265-299. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
  4. Bandura, A., & McClelland, D. C. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Prentice-Hall.
  5. Bhattacherjee, A., & Sanford, C. (2006). Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model. MIS quarterly, 805-825. doi: 10.2307/25148755
  6. Cao, J., Liu, F., Shang, M., & Zhou, X. (2021). Toward street vending in post COVID-19 China: Social networking services information overload and switching intention. Technology in Society, 66, 101669. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101669
  7. Casaló L. V., Flavián C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez S. (2018). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 92, 168-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.005
  8. Chang, H. H., Lu, Y. Y., & Lin, S. C. (2020). An elaboration likelihood model of consumer respond action to Facebook second-hand marketplace: Impulsiveness as a moderator.  Information & Management57(2), 103171. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2019.103171
  9. Charlesworth, A. (2012). Internet Marketing: A Practical Approach. Routledge, New York, p 290.
  10. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893-910. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893
  11. Chung, C. H., Chiu, D. K. W., Ho, K. K. W., & Au, C. H. (2020). Applying social media to environmental education: is it more impactful than traditional media? Information Discovery and Delivery, 48(4), 255-266. doi: 10.1108/IDD-04-2020-0047
  12. Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior. In M. P. Zanna, (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, (pp. 201–234), Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
  13. Conte, R. (2000). Memes through (social) minds. In R. Aunger (Ed.), Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science (pp. 83–120). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof: oso/9780192632449.001.0001
  14. Cracco E., Genschow O., Radkova I., & Brass M. (2018). Automatic imitation of pro- and antisocial gestures: Is implicit social behavior censored? Cognition, 170, 179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.019”10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.019
  15. Davies, B., Turner, M., & Udell, J. (2023). It helps to be funny or compassionate: An exploration of user experiences and evaluation of social media micro-intervention designs for protecting body image. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 107999. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107999
  16. Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Distin, K. (2014). Foreword to the Chinese translation of The Selfish Meme. Cambridge University Press and Beijing World Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.distin.co.uk/memes/scans/Foreword_Chinese.pdf
  18. Fasya, E. L., van den Bos, E., Heylen, D. K. J., & Kret, M. E. (2024). Smile mimicry smoothens human-virtual human interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 183, 103182. doi: 10.1016/j. ijhcs.2023.103182
  19. Fatt, S. J., & Fardouly, J. (2023). Digital social evaluation: Relationships between receiving likes, comments, and follows on social media and adolescents’ body image concerns. Body Image, 47, 101621. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.101621
  20. Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Gleeson, .J., Vancampfort, D., Armitage, C.J., & Sarris. J. (2019). The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 18(2),119-129. doi: 10.1002/wps.20617
  21. Fleck, N. D., & Quester, P. (2007). Birds of a feather flock together… definition, role and measure of congruence: An application to sponsorship.  Psychology & Marketing24(11), 975-1000. doi: 10.1002/mar.20192
  22. Flores, P. M., Hilbert, M. (2023). Lean-back and lean-forward online behaviors: The role of emotions in passive versus proactive information diffusion of social media content. Computers in Human Behavior, 147,107841. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107841
  23. Fu, J. R., Ju, P. H., & Hsu, C. W. (2015). Understanding why consumers engage in electronic word-of-mouth communication: Perspectives from the theory of planned behavior and justice theory. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(6), 616-630. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2015.09.003
  24. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. New York Routledge.
  25. Geyser W. (2022). What is an influencer? Social media influencers defined [updated February 14th, 2024]. Influencer Marketing Hub. Retrieved from https://influencermarketinghub.com/what-is-an-influencer
  26. Graczyk-Kucharska, M., & Erickson, G.S. (2020). A  person-organization fit model of Generation Z: Preliminary studies. Journal of Entrepreneur-ship, Management and Innovation, 16(4), 149-176. doi: 10.7341/20201645
  27. Harrigan, N., Achananuparp, P., & Lim, E. P. (2012). Influentials, novelty, and social contagion: The viral power of average friends, close communities, and old news. Social Networks34(4), 470-480. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.02.005
  28. Hatfield, E., Rapson, R. L., & Le, Y.-C. L. (2009). Emotional contagion and empathy. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.),  The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 19–30). Boston Review. doi: 10.7551/mit-press/9780262012973.003.0003
  29. Haug, M., Reiter, J., & Gewald, H. (2024). Content creators on Instagram - How users cope with stress on social media. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 13, 100111. doi: 10.1016/j.teler.2023.100111
  30. Haug, M., Reiter, J., & Gewald, H. (2024). Content creators on Instagram - How users cope with stress on social media. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 13, 100111. doi: 10.1016/j.teler.2023.100111
  31. Hayes, R. A., Carr, C. T., & Wohn, D. Y. (2016). One click, many meanings: Interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media.  Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media60(1), 171-187. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2015.1127248
  32. Herman, L. E., Udayana, I. B. N., & Farida, N. (2021). Young generation and environmental friendly awareness: does it the impact of green advertising?. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 159-166. doi: 10.3846/ btp.2021.12417
  33. Jacoby, J., Speller, D. E., & Kohn, C. A. (1974). Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load.  Journal of Marketing Research11(1), 63-69.  doi: 10.1177/002224377401100106
  34. Karr-Wisniewski, P. & Lu, Y. (2010). When more is too much: Operationalizing technology overload and exploring its impact on knowledge worker productivity, Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1061-1072. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.008
  35. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press.
  36. Kohli, C., Suri, R., & Kapoor, A. (2014). Will social media kill branding? Business Horizons, 58(1), 35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.08.004
  37. Kowalczyk-Purol, K. (2015). Memes and cognitive schemas. Bridging the gap between memetics and social sciences. Teksty z Ulicy. Zeszyt Memetyczny, 16, 27-41.
  38. Krippes, M., Najmaei, M., & Wach, K. (2024). The impact of sustainable product attributes on the consumer behaviour of Generation Z in Germany. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 346-364. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2024.29.2.18.
  39. Laninga-Wijnen, L., & Veenstra, R. (2023). Peer similarity in adolescent social networks: Types of selection and influence, and factors contributing to openness to peer influence. In B. Halpern-Felsher (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Health (1st Edition, pp. 196-206), Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818872-9.00047-9
  40. Laurn, S. (2023). 7 Types of Social Media Interactions (and How To Handle Them). Retrieved from https://blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-interaction/
  41. Levickaitė, R. (2010). Generations X, Y, Z: how social networks form the concept of the world without borders (the case of Lithuania). Creativity Studies, 3(2), 170-183. doi: 10.3846/limes.2010.17
  42. Luo, L., Liu, J., Shen, H., Lai, Y. (2023). Vote or not? How language mimicry affect peer recognition in an online social Q&A community. Neurocomputing, 530, 139-149. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2023.01.086
  43. Mattke, J., Maier, Ch., Reis, L., & Weitzel, T. (2020). Herd behavior in social media: The role of Facebook likes, strength of ties, and expertise. Information & Management, 57(8), 103370. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2020.103370
  44. Matyjek, M., Meliss, S., Dziobek, I., & Murayama, K. (2020). A Multidimensional View on Social and Non-Social Rewards. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 818. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00818
  45. Menczer, F. & Hill, T. (2020). The Attention Economy. Scientific American Magazine, 323(6), 54. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1220-54
  46. Menczer, F., & Hills, T. (2020). The Attention Economy. Scientific American, 323(6), 54-61. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1220-54
  47. Modgil, S., Singh, R.K., Gupta, S., & Donnehy, D. (2021).  A Confirmation Bias View on Social Media Induced Polarisation During Covid-19.  Information Systems Frontiers, 26, 417-441. doi: 10.1007/s10796-021-10222-9
  48. Moradi,  M., &  Zihagh,  F.  (2022).  A meta-analysis of the elaboration likelihood model in the electronic word of mouth literature. International Journal of Consumer Studies46(5), 1900-1918. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12814
  49. Müller, J., & Christandl, F. (2019). Content is king - But who is the king of kings? The effect of content marketing, sponsored content & user-generated content on brand responses. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.006
  50. Muntinga, D. G. (2013). Catching COBRAs. Amsterdam: SWOCC.
  51. Park, S., & Jung, J. (2023). The interplay between social media virality metrics and message framing in influence perception of pro-environmental messages and behavioral intentions. Telematics and Informatics, 78, 101947. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2023.101947
  52. Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
  53. Ruvio, A., Gavish, Y., & Shoham, A. (2013). Consumer’s doppelganger: A role model perspective on intentional consumer mimicry. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(1), 60-69. doi: 10.1002/cb.1415
  54. Sasahara, K., Chen, W., Peng, H., Ciampaglia, G. L., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2021). Social influence and unfollowing accelerate the emergence of echo chambers.  Journal of Computational Social Science4(1), 381-402. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1905.03919
  55. Schlaile, M. P., Knausberg, T., Mueller, M., & Zeman, J. (2018). Viral ice buckets: A memetic perspective on the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge’s diffusion. Cognitive Systems Research, 52, 947-969. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.09.012
  56. Sheng, N., Yang, Ch., Han, L., & Jou, M. (2023). Too much overload and concerns: Antecedents of social media fatigue and the mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107500. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107500
  57. Smeijers, D., Uzieblo, K., Glennon, J. C., Driessen J. M. A, & Brazil, I. A. (2022). Examining Individual Differences in Social Reward Valuation: a Person-Based Approach. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 44, 312-325. doi: 10.1007/s10862-021-09934-8
  58. Smith, K. (2017). Mobile advertising to Digital Natives: preferences on content, style, personalization, and functionality. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 27, 1-14. doi: 10.1080/0965254X.2017.1384043
  59. Song, Y., Lin, Q., Kwon, K. H., Choy, Ch. H. Y., Xu, R. (2022). Contagion of offensive speech online: An interactional analysis of political swearing. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107046. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107046
  60. Stavrositu, C. D., & Kim, J. (2014). Social media metrics: Third-person perceptions of health information. Computers in Human Behavior35, 61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.025
  61. Stel, M., & Vonk, R. (2010). Mimicry in social interaction: Benefits for mimickers, mimickees, and their interaction.  British Journal of Psychology101(2), 311-323. doi: 10.1348/000712609x465424
  62. Strong, E. (1925). The Psychology of Selling. MacGraw-Hill, Nueva York.
  63. Sun, H. (2013). A Longitudinal Study of Herd Behavior in the Adoption and Continued Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1013-1041. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43825780
  64. Sun, H., Feng, Y., & Meng, Q. (2024). Information dissemination behavior of self-media in emergency: Considering the impact of information synergistic-hedging effect on public utility. Expert Systems with Applications (In Press, Journal Pre-proof), 124110. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124110
  65. Tan, X., & Cousins, K.C. (2016). Herding Behavior in Social Media Networks in China. Americas Conference on Information Systems. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301368818.pdf
  66. Trinity College Dublin (2024). Frequently asked questions. Trinity College Dublin School of Linguistic, Speech and Communication Sciences Research Ethics Committee. Retrieved from www.tcd.ie/slscs/assets/documents/research/ethics/SLSCS_REC_FAQs.pdf.
  67. Vandenbosch, L., Fardouly, J., & Tiggemann, M. (2022). Social media and body image: Recent trends and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101289. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.002
  68. Whelan, G., Moon, J., & Grant, B. (2013). Corporations and Citizenship Arenas in the Age of Social Media. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 777-790. doi: 10.1007/ s10551-013-1960-3
  69. Wohn, D. Y., Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2016). How affective is a “Like”?: The effect of paralinguistic digital affordances on perceived social support. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking19(9), 562-566. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0162
  70. Xiao, C., Ye, J., Esteves, R.M., & Rong, C. (2016). Using Spearman’s correlation coefficients for exploratory data analysis on big dataset. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 28, 3866-3878. doi: 10.1002/cpe.3745”10.1002/cpe.3745
  71. Xu, F., & Warkentin, M. (2020). Integrating elaboration likelihood model and herd theory in information security message persuasiveness. Computers & Security, 98, 102009. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2020.102009
  72. Xu, M., Wei, Z., & Wu, J. (2022). How emotional communication happens in social media: Predicting “Arousal-Homophily-Echo” emotional communication with multi-dimensional features. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 8, 100019. doi: 10.1016/j.teler.2022.100019
  73. Zha, X., Yang, H., Yan, Y., Liu, K., & Huang, Ch. (2018). Exploring the effect of social media information quality, source credibility and reputation on informational fit-to-task: Moderating role of focused immersion. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 227-237. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.038
  74. Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Ni, Z., & Liu, Z. (2024). Heart or mind? The impact of congruence on the persuasiveness of cognitive versus affective appeals in debunking messages on social media during public health crises. Computers in Human Behavior, 154, 108136. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108136
  75. Zhang, S., Zhao, L., Lu, Y. & Yang, J. (2016). Do you get tired of socializing? An empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network services. Information & Management, 53(7), 904-914. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2016.03.006
  76. Zhang, X., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2020). An overview of online fake news: Characterization, detection, and discussion.  Information Processing & Management, 57(2), 102025. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2024-0031 | Journal eISSN: 2543-912X | Journal ISSN: 2543-6597
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 33
Submitted on: Aug 1, 2024
|
Accepted on: Nov 30, 2024
|
Published on: Dec 24, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Krzysztof Stepaniuk, George Lăzăroiu, Chrystyna Misiewicz, Verónica Crespo Pereira, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.