Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Operationalising Responsible Research and Innovation – tools for enterprises Cover

Operationalising Responsible Research and Innovation – tools for enterprises

Open Access
|Nov 2019

References

  1. Chodakowska, E., & Nazarko, J. (2017). Network DEA Models for Evaluating Couriers and Messengers. Procedia Engineering, 182, 106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.130
  2. Ceicyte, J. (2019). Implementing responsible innovation at the firm level. Kaunas, Lithuania: Kaunas University of Technology.
  3. Ejdys, J., & Nazarko, Ł. (2014). Foresight gospodarczy - instrumentem orientacji na przyszłość [Economic foresight as an instrument of a future-oriented strategy]. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 340, 651–664.
  4. Ejdys, J., Nazarko, J., Nazarko, L., & Halicka, K. (2015). Foresight application for transport sector. In M. Fiorini (Ed.), Clean Mobility and Intelligent Transport Systems (pp. 379–402). London, Great Britain: The Institution of Engineering and Technology. doi: 10.1049/PBTR001E_ch17
  5. Flipse, S. M., Van Dam, K. H., Stragier, J., Oude Vrielink, T. J. C., & Van der Sanden, M. C. A. (2015). Operationalizing responsible research innovation in industry through decision support in innovation practice. Journal of Chain and Network, 15(2), 135–146. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2015.x004
  6. Genus, A., & Iskandarova, M. (2018). Responsible innovation: its institutionalisation and a critique. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.029
  7. Geoghegan-Quinn, M. (2012). Responsible Research and Innovation. Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. Proceedings of the Science in Dialogues - Towards a European Model for Responsible Research and Innovation. Odense, Denmark, 23–35.
  8. Gianni, R. (2016). Responsibility and Freedom. The Ethical Realm of RRI. London and Hoboken: ISTE and John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Goepel, K. D. (2018). Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHPOS). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(3), 469–487. doi: 10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590
  10. Grinbaum, A., & Groves, C. (2013) What is “responsible” about “responsible innovation”? In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 119–142). Chichester, Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons.
  11. Grunwald, A. (2011). Responsible Innovation: Bringing together Technology Assessment, Applied Ethics, and STS research. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, 10, 9–31.
  12. Grunwald, A. (2014). Technology assessment for responsible innovation. In J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swiestra, B. J. Koops, & H. A. Romijn (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 1 (pp. 15–31). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  13. Gurzawska, A., Mäkinen, M., & Brey, P. (2017). Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) practices in industry: Providing the right incentives. Sustainability, 9(10), 1759. doi: 10.3390/su9101759
  14. Halicka, K. (2017). Main Concepts of Technology Analysis in the Light of the Literature on the Subject. Procedia Engineering, 182, 191–298. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.196
  15. Halme, M., & Korpela, M. (2014). Responsible innovation toward sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises: a resource perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(8), 547–566. doi: 10.1002/bse.1801
  16. Hedstrom, G. S. (2019). Sustainability: What It Is and How to Measure It. Boston-Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781547400423-202
  17. Inzelt, A., & Csonka, L. (2017). The Approach of the Business Sector to Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). Foresight and STI Governance, 11(4), 63–73. doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.63.73
  18. KARIM (2014). Introduction to a guide to entrepreneurs and innovation support organization. Retrieved from http://www.nweurope.eu/media/1118/guide_online.pdf
  19. Kuhlman, S., Stegmaier, P., & Konrad, K. (2019). The tentative governance of emerging science and technology — A conceptual introduction. Research Policy, 48(5), 1091–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.006
  20. MoRRI (2018). The evolution of Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe: The MoRRI indicators report. Retrieved from https://morri.netlify.com/
  21. Nazarko, J., Kuźmicz, K. A., Szubzda-Prutis, E., & Urban, J. (2009). The General Concept of Benchmarking and Its Application in Higher Education in Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 34(3&4), 497–510.
  22. Nazarko, J., Radziszewski, R., Dębkowska, K., Ejdys, J., Gudanowska, A., Halicka, K., Kilon, J., Kononiuk, A., Kowalski, K. J., Król, J. B., Nazarko, Ł., Sarnowski, M., & Vilutienė, T. (2015). Foresight Study of Road Pavement Technologies. Procedia Engineering, 122, 129–136. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.016
  23. Nazarko, L. (2019). Responsible Research and Innovation – a Conceptual Contribution to Theory and Practice of Technology Management. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 342–351. doi: 10.3846/btp.2019.32
  24. OECD (2015). Daejeon Declaration on Science, Technology, and Innovation Policies for the Global and Digital Age. OECD Ministerial Meeting Daejeon 2015, World Science Forum. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sti/daejeon-declaration-2015.htm
  25. OECD (2016). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016. Paris. doi:10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-en
  26. Owen, R., Stigloe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 27–50). Chichester, Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons.
  27. Pavie, X., & Carthy, D. (2013). Responsible-innovation in practice: How to implement responsibility across an organization. Cahier Innovation & Society, 33.
  28. Pavie, X., Scholten, V., & Carthy, D. (2014). Responsible innovation: From concept to practice. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
  29. ResAgorA (2016). Responsibility Navigator. Retrieved from https://responsibility-navigator.eu/navigator/
  30. Rohrbeck, R. (2011). Corporate Foresight: Towards a Maturity Model for the Future Orientation of a Firm. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  31. RRI Tools (undated). Self-Reflection Tool. Retrieved from https://www.rri-tools.eu/self-reflection-tool
  32. Stahl, B. (2013). Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework. Science and Public Policy, 40(6), 708–716. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct067
  33. Stahl, B. C. (2017). The ORBIT Self-Assessment Tool. ORBIT Journal, 1(2). doi: 10.29297/orbit.v1i2.59
  34. Stahl, B. C., Obach, M., Yaghmaei, E., Ikonen, V., Chatfield, K., & Brem, A. (2017). The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice. Sustainability, 9(6), 1–19. doi: 10.3390/su9061036
  35. Stigloe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework from responsible innovation. Research policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
  36. Sutcliffe, H. (2000). A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf
  37. van de Poel, I., Asveld, L., Flipse, S., Klaassen, P., Scholten, V., & Yaghmaei, E. (2017). Company Strategies for Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): A Conceptual Model. Sustainability, 9(11), 2045. doi: 10.3390/su9112045
  38. van den Hoven, M. J., Lokhorst, G., & van de Poel, I. (2012). Engineering and the problem of moral overload. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18, 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9277-z
  39. van den Hoven, J. (2013). Value sensitive design and responsible innvation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & H. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 75–83). London, Great Britain: John Wiley.
  40. van den Hoven, J. (2014). Responsible Innovation: A new look at technology ethics. In J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swiestra, B. J. Koops, & H. A. Romijn (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 1 (pp. 3–13). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  41. von Schomberg, R. (2012). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In M. Dusseldorp, & R. Beecroft (Eds.), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren (pp. 39–61). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  42. von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & H. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 51–74). London, Great Britain: John Wiley.
  43. Wilford, S. H. (2015). What is required of requirements? A first stage process towards developing guidelines for responsible research. SIGCAS Computers and Society, 45(3), 348–355. doi: 10.1145/2874239.2874291
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2019-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2543-912X | Journal ISSN: 2543-6597
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 28
Submitted on: Jun 5, 2019
Accepted on: Sep 10, 2019
Published on: Nov 19, 2019
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Lukasz Nazarko, Borisas Melnikas, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.