Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Peri-Urban Forests as a Recreational Environment for the Public in Kyiv, Ukraine Cover

Peri-Urban Forests as a Recreational Environment for the Public in Kyiv, Ukraine

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Agimass, F., Lundhede, T., Panduro, T.E. & Jacobsen J.B. (2018). The choice of forest site for recreation: A revealed preference analysis using spatial data. Ecosystem Services, 31(C), 445‒454. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.016.
  2. Andkjær, S. & Arvidsen J. (2015). Places for active outdoor recreation – a scoping review. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 12, 25‒46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2015.10.001.
  3. Baránková, Z. & Špulerová J. (2023). Human–nature relationships in defining biocultural landscapes: A systematic review. Ekológia (Bratislava), 42(1), 64‒74. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2023-0008.
  4. Bartczak, A., Lindhjem, H., Navrud, S., Zandersen, M. & Żylicz T. (2008). Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: The case of Poland. Forest Policy and Economics, 10(7–8), 467‒472. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.04.002.
  5. Bindewald, A., Brundu, G., Schueler, S., Starfinger, U., Bauhus, J. & Lapin K. (2021). Site-specific risk assessment enables trade-off analysis of non-native tree species in European forests. Ecologi and Evolution, 11, 18089‒18110. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8407.
  6. Cao, J., Zhang, J., Wang, C., Hu, H. & Yu P. (2020). How Far Is the Ideal Destination? Distance Desire, Ways to Explore the Antinomy of Distance Effects in Tourist Destination Choice. Journal of Travel Research, 59(4), 614‒630. DOI: 10.1177/0047287519844832.
  7. Cheng, Z., Nitoslawski, S., Konijnendijk, C., Sheppard, S., Nesbitt, L. & Girling C. (2021). Alignment of municipal climate change and urban forestry policies: A Canadian perspective. Environmental Science & Policy, 122, 2021, 14‒24. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.04.005.
  8. Daniel, T.C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1‒4), 267‒281, DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4.
  9. Dimitrova, A., Csilléry, K., Klisz, M., Lévesque, M., Heinrichs, S., Cailleret, M., Andivia, E., Madsen, P., Böhenius, H., Cvjetkovic, B., de Cuyper, B., de Dato, G., Ferus, P., Heinze, B., Ivetic, V., Köbölkuti, Z., Lazarevic, J., Lazdina, D., Maaten, T., Makovskis, K., Milovanovic, J., Monteiro, A.T., Nonic, M., Place, S., Puchalka, R. & Montagnoli A. (2022). Risks, benefits, and knowledge gaps of non-native tree species in Europe. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 908464. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.908464.
  10. Dumas, Y. (2016). Introduced tree species in forest and the implications for biodiversity. In F. Krumm & L.Vitkova (Eds.), Introduced tree species in European forests: challenges and opportunities (pp. 286‒293). European Forest Institute.
  11. Forest Code of Ukraine No. 3852-XII. (1994) (in Ukrainian). Retrieved February 10, 2025, from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3852-12#Text.
  12. Geacu, S. & Grigorescu I. (2022). Historical Changes in Urban and Peri-Urban Forests: Evidence from the Galați Area, Romania. Land, 11, 2043. DOI: 10.3390/land11112043.
  13. Giné D.S., Albert, M.Y.P. & Buendía A.V.P. (2021). Aesthetic assessment of the landscape using psychophysical and psychological models: Comparative analysis in a protected natural area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214, 104197. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104197.
  14. Grebner, D.L., Bettinger, P., Siry, J.P. & Boston K. (2022). Introduction to Forestry and Natural Resources. London: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819002-9.00007-9.
  15. Gregor, T., & Kasperek G. (2021). Non-native woody plant species in urban forests of Frankfurt/Main (Germany). Tuexenia, 41, 133‒145. DOI: 10.14471/2020.41.001.
  16. Gundersen, V. & Vistad O.I. (2016). Public Opinions and Use of Various Types of Recreational Infrastructure in Boreal Forest Settings. Forests, 7, 113. DOI: 10.3390/f7060113.
  17. Hegetschweiler, K.T., Stride, C.B., Fischer, C., Ginzler, C. & Hunziker M. (2022). Integrating recreation into National Forest Inventories – Results from a forest visitor survey in winter and summer. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 39, 100489. DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2022.100489.
  18. Kaisová, D. & Laco I. (2021). Capacity and flow of selected cultural ecosystem services: Case study of microregion Terchovská valley. Ekológia (Bratislava), 40(3), 276‒285. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2021-0030.
  19. Kim, J. & Nicholls S. (2016). Influence of the measurement of distance on assessment of recreation access. Leisure Sciences, 38(2), 118‒139, DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2015.1071211.
  20. Kohno, M. (2001). Dendroflora of Ukraine. Wild and cultivated trees and shrubs (in Ukraine). Kyiv: Higher School.
  21. Korpilo, S., Virtanen, T., Saukkonen, T. & Lehvävirta S. (2018). More than A to B: Understanding and managing visitor spatial behaviour in urban forests using public participation GIS. Journal of Environmental Management, 207, 124‒133. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.020.
  22. Krnáčová, Z., Barančok, P., Pavličková, K. & Platková-Demčáková A. (2021). Comparison of methodological approaches for the evaluation of ecosystem services for options to develop sustainable tourism forms (ecotourism) (Example: Bratislava IV). Ekológia (Bratislava), 40(2), 189‒200. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2021-0021.
  23. Langmaier, M. & Lapin K. (2020) A Systematic Review of the Impact of Invasive Alien Plants on Forest Regeneration in European Temperate Forests. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 524969. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.524969.
  24. Liu, H., Xu, X., Tam, V.WY. & Mao P. (2023). Exploring the ‘dark’ side of forest therapy and recreation: A critical review and future directions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 183, 113480. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113480.
  25. Municipal association Kyivzelenbud. Recreation areas. Retrieved February 13, 2025, from https://kyivzelenbud.com/maps/zony-vidpochynku/.
  26. Nevřelová, M., Lehotská, B. & Ružičková J. (2022). Methodology of wild-life underpasses attractiveness assessment. Ekológia (Bratislava), 41(2), 172‒182. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2022-0018.
  27. Ode, Å., Tveit, M. & Fry G. (2008). Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape Research, 33(1), 89‒117. DOI: 10.1080/01426390701773854.
  28. Ozkan, U.Y. & Ozdemir I. (2015). Assessment of landscape silhouette value in urban forests based on structural diversity indices. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 12, 3971‒3980. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-015-0826-x.
  29. Park, D., Kim, J., Kim, W.G. & Park H. (2019). Does distance matter? Examining the distance effect on tourists’ multi-attraction travel behaviors. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(6), 692‒709. DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2019.1624243.
  30. Pötzelsberger, E., Spiecker, H., Neophytou, C., Mohren, F., Gazda, A. & Hasenauer H. (2020). Growing Non-native Trees in European Forests Brings Benefits and Opportunities but Also Has Its Risks and Limits. Current Forestry Report, 6, 339‒353. DOI: 10.1007/s40725-020-00129-0.
  31. Project of Organization and Development of the Communal Enterprise “Darnytske Forest Park Management” of the Municipal Association “Kyivzelenbud” of the Kyiv City State Administration. (in Ukrainian). (2020a). Irpin: Publishing House of Geodesy and Forest Management.
  32. Project of Organization and Development of the Communal Enterprise “Forest Park Management Koncha-Zaspa” of the Municipal Association “Kyivzelenbud” of the Kyiv City State Administration. (in Ukrainian). (2020b). Irpin: Publishing House of Geodesy and Forest Management.
  33. Project of Organization and Development of the Communal Enterprise “Svyatoshynske Forest Park Management” of the Municipal Association “Kyivzelenbud” of the Kyiv City State Administration. (in Ukrainian). (2020c). Irpin: Publishing House of Geodesy and Forest Management.
  34. Qian, J., Law, R. & Wei J. (2018). Effect of cultural distance on tourism: A study of pleasure visitors in Hong Kong. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 19(2), 269‒284. DOI: 10.1080/1528008X.2017.1410079.
  35. Rathmann, J., Beck, C., Flutura, S., Seiderer, A., Aslan, I. & André E. (2020). Towards quantifying forest recreation: Exploring outdoor thermal physiology and human well-being along exemplary pathways in a central European urban forest (Augsburg, SE-Germany). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 49, 126622. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126622.
  36. Rolfe, J. & Windle J. (2015). Multifunctional recreation and nouveau heritage values in plantation forests. Journal of Forest Economics, 21(3), 131‒151. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2015.06.001.
  37. Ryan, S.C., Sugg, M.M., Runkle, J.D. & Matthews J.L. (2023). Spatial Analysis of Greenspace and Mental Health in North Carolina. Family & Community Health, 46(3), 181‒191. DOI: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000363.
  38. Salbitano, F., Borelli, S., Conigliaro, M. & Chen Y. (2016). Guidelines on urban and peri-urban forestry. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/i6210e/i6210e.pdf.
  39. Takhtajan, A. (1978). The Floristic Regions of the World (in Russian). Leningrad: Nauka.
  40. Tan, P.Y., Ismail, H.N. & Syed Jaafar S.M.R. (2023). A comparative review: distance decay in urban and rural tourism. Anatolia, 34(4), 476‒493. DOI: 10.1080/13032917.2022.2051057.
  41. Termansen, M., Zandersen, M. & McClean C.J. (2008). Spatial substitution patterns in forest recreation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(1), 81‒97. DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.01.006.
  42. Tokarieva, О.V. (2011). The main directions of improving the sanitary and aesthetic condition of urban forests in Kyiv (in Ukrainian). Scientific Bulletin of NUBiP of Ukraine, 164(3), 139‒143.
  43. Trummer, J. & Hegetschweiler K.T. (2023). How do forest visitors perceive forest management forms? Public acceptance of coppice-with-standards in urban forests. Trees, Forests and People, 14, 100439. DOI: 10.1016/j. tfp.2023.100439.
  44. Tveit, M., Ode Sang, Å. & Hägerhäll C. (2018). Scenic beauty: Visual landscape assessment and human landscape perception. In Environmental Psychology: An Introduction (pp. 37‒46). London: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781119241072.ch5.
  45. Vishnevskyi, V.I., Donich, O.A., & Kutsiy A.V. (2023). Climate of Kyiv and its surroundings (in Ukrainian). Kyiv: Varto.
  46. Wajchman-Switalska, S., Zajadacz, A. & Lubarska A. (2021). Recreation and Therapy in Urban Forests–The Potential Use of Sensory Garden Solutions. Forests, 12, 1402. DOI: 10.3390/f12101402.
  47. Wajchman-Świtalska, S., Zajadacz, A., Woźniak, M., Jaszczak, R. & Beker C. (2022). Recreational Evaluation of Forests in Urban Environments: Methodological and Practical Aspects. Sustainability, 14(22), 15177. DOI: 10.3390/su142215177.
  48. Wang, G., Li, J., Liu, X., Li, B. & Zhang Y. (2024). Social-ecological network of peri-urban forest in urban expansion: A case study of urban agglomeration in Guanzhong Plain, China. Land Use Policy, 139, 107074. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107074.
  49. Wang, X., Zhang, J. & Wu C. (2022). Users’ recreation choices and setting preferences for trails in urban forests in Nanjing, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 73, 127602. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127602.
  50. WFO (2025). World Flora Online. http://www.worldfloraonline.org.
  51. Yavorovskyi, P.P., Sendonin, S.J. & Tokarieva O.V. (2019). Recreational forestry (in Ukrainian). Kyiv: Naukova Stolyzja.
  52. Yu, H.-W., Lin, C.-C. & Liu W.-Y. (2023). Predicting forest recreation benefits changes under different climate change scenarios. Trees, Forests and People, 12, 100390. DOI: 10.1016/j.tfp.2023.100390.
  53. Zandersen, M. & Tol R.S.J. (2009). A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe. Journal of Forest Economics, 15(1–2), 109‒130. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2026-0009 | Journal eISSN: 1337-947X | Journal ISSN: 1335-342X
Language: English
Page range: 82 - 90
Submitted on: Mar 22, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 5, 2026
Published on: Jun 17, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Olha Tokarieva, Anzhela Dzyba, Hafte Mebrahten Tesfay, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.