Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Harvest Mouse (Micromys Minutus) Nest Density and Dimensions in Slovakia Cover

The Harvest Mouse (Micromys Minutus) Nest Density and Dimensions in Slovakia

Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Balčiauskas, L. & Balčiauskienė L. (2023). Long-term stability of harvest mouse population. Diversity, 15, 1102. DOI: 10.3390/d15101102.
  2. Bence, S.L., Stander, K. & Griffiths M. (2003). Habitat characteristics of harvest mouse nests on arable farmland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 99, 179‒186. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00137-3.
  3. Benton, T.G., Vickery, J.A. & Wilson J.D. (2003). Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogenity the key? Trends Ecol. Evol., 18, 182–188. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9.
  4. Csanády, A. (2022). Occurrence of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) and the hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) in Slovakia based on summer nests (2013–2021). Acta Musei Silesiae. Scientiae Naturales, 71(3), 223–236. DOI: 10.2478/cszma-2022-0012.
  5. Čanády, A. (2012). Contribution to the knowledge of Micromys minutus and Muscardinus avellanarius distribution in eastern Slovakia based on the survey of summer nests in 2010–2012 (Rodentia). Lynx (Praha), n.s. 43(1–2), 5–15.
  6. Čanády, A. (2013). Nest dimensions and nest sites of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus Pallas, 1771) from Slovakia: a case study from field margins. Zoology and Ecology, 23(4), 253–259. DOI: 10.1080/21658005.2013.853492.
  7. Čanády, A. (2015). Factors predicting summer nest construction of Muscardinus avellanarius in deciduous woodland edges in Slovakia. Biologia, 70(1), 132–140. DOI: 10.1515/biolog-2015-0010.
  8. Darinot, F. (2016). The harvest mouse (Micromys minutus Pallas, 1771) as prey: a literature review. Folia Zool., 65(2), 117–137. DOI: 10.25225/fozo.v65.i2.a7.2016.
  9. Darinot, F. (2019). Dispersion et structure génétique d’une population de Rat des moissons (Micromys minutus PALLAS, 1771) soumise à des inondations régulières. Doctoral dissertation, PSL research University.
  10. Darinot, F., Le Petitcorps, Q., Arnal, V., Coulon, A. & Montgelard C. (2021). Effects of landscape features and flooding on the genetic structure of a small wetland rodent, the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus). Landsc. Ecol., 36, 1755–1771. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-021-01235-5.
  11. Dickman, C.R. (1986). Habitat utilization and diet of the harvest mouse Micromys minutus, in an urban environment. Acta Theriol., 31, 249–256.
  12. Donald, P.F., Green, R.E. & Heath, M.F. (2001). Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Series B, 268, 25–29. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1325.
  13. Dover, J.W. (2019). The Ecology of Hedgerows and Field Margins. Oxon: Rout-ledge.
  14. Farský, O. (1963). Finding of harvest mouse (Micromys minutus Pallas) in the Czech lands between 1912–1950. Lynx (Praha) n.s. 2, 9–15.
  15. Feber, R.E., Johnson, P.J., Gelling, M. & Macdonald D.W. (2019). Ecology and conservation of mammals of hedgerows and field margins. In J.W. Dover (Ed.), The Ecology of Hedgerows and Field Margins (pp. 233‒249). Oxon: Routledge.
  16. Gregory, R.D., Noble, D.G. & Custance J. (2004). The state of play of farmland birds: population trends and conservation status of lowland farmland birds in the United Kingdom. Ibis, 146, 1–13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00358.x.
  17. Harris, S. (1979). History, distribution, status and habitat requirements of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) in Britain. Mammal Rev., 9(4), 159–171. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1979.tb00253.x.
  18. Hata, S. (2011). Nesting characteristics of harvest mice (Micromys minutus) in three types of Japanese grasslands with different inundation frequencies. Mammal Study, 36, 49–53. DOI: 10.3106/041.036.0106.
  19. Hata, S., Sawabe, K. & Natsuhara Y. (2010). A suitable embankment mowing strategy for habitat conservation of the harvest mouse. Landscape Ecology Engineering, 6, 133–142. DOI: 10.1007/s11355-009-0079-2.
  20. Kminiak, M. (1968a). Contribution to the knowledge of the Micromys minutus Pallas 1771 ecology in the western part of the reservation Jursky Sur in Bratislava. Zoologické Listy, 17(2), 127–139.
  21. Kminiak, M. (1968b). The knowledge of the nesting ecology of the species Micromys minutus Pallas, 1771 in the reserve Jurský Šúr in Bratislava. Lynx (Praha), n.s. 9, 36–37.
  22. Kuroe, M., Ohori, S., Takatsuki, S. & Miyashita T. (2007). Nest-Site Selection by the harvest mouse Micromys minutus in seasonally changing environments. Acta Theriol., 54(2), 355–360. DOI: 10.1007/BF03194233.
  23. Lloyd, A.J. & Kirk S. (2021). Annual fluctuations in harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) nest densities in southern England. Mammal Communications, 7, 1–5. DOI: 10.59922/PWJA9530.
  24. Marshall, E.J.P. (2002). Introducing field margin ecology in Europe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 89(1–2), 1‒4. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00314-0.
  25. Marshall, E.J.P. (2005). Field margins in northern Europe: Integrating agricultural, environmental and biodiversity functions. In A.G. Thomas (Ed.), Field boundary habitats: implications for weed, insect and disease management (pp. 39‒67). Sainte-Anne-de Bellevue, QC, Canada: Canadian Weed Science Society.
  26. Marshall, E.J.P. & Arnold G.M. (1995). Factors affecting field weed and field margin flora on a farm in Essex, UK. Landsc. Urban Plann. 31(1–3), 205–216. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(94)01047-C.
  27. Marshall, E.J.P. & Moonen A.C. (2002). Field Margins in Northern Europe: Their Functions and Interactions with Agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 89, 5–21. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00315-2.
  28. Mathews, F. & Harrower C. (2020). IUCN – compliant Red List for Britain’s terrestrial mammals. Assessment by the mammal society under contract to Natural England, Natural Resources Wales and Scottish Natural Heritage. Peterborough: Natural England.
  29. Májsky, J. (1985). Drobné zemné cicavce lužných lesov a vetrolamov hornej časti Žitného ostrova. Biologické Práce SAV, 31(2), 1–111.
  30. Montgomery, I., Caruso, T. & Reid N. (2020). Hedgerows as ecosystems: Service Delivery, Management, and Restoration. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 51, 81–102. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-012120-100346.
  31. Pelikán, J. (1986). Small mammals in windbreaks and adjacent fields. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Academiae Scientiarum Bohemicae, Brno, 20(4), 1–38.
  32. Pelikán, J. (1989). Small mammals in fragments of Robinia pseudoacacia stands. Folia Zool., 38(3), 199–212.
  33. Riordan, P., Lloyd, A. & Macdonald D.W. (2009). Do harvest mouse nest survey results predict population size? A report to the people’s trust for endangered species.
  34. Robinson, R.A. & Sutherland W.J. (2002). Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J. Appl. Ecol., 39(1), 157–176. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00695.x.
  35. Selås, V. (2006). Explaining bank vole cycles in southern Norway 1980-2004 from bilberry reports 1932-1977 climate. Oecologia, 147, 625–631. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0326-7.
  36. Shepherd, J.D. & Ditgen R.S. (2012). Predation by Rattus norvegicus on a native small mammal in an Araucaria araucana forest of Neuquén, Argentina. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat., 85(2), 155–159.
  37. Sklenicka, P., Molnarova, K., Brabec, E., Kumble, P., Pittnerova, B, Pixova, K. & Salek M. (2009). Remnants of medieval field patterns in the Czech Republic: analysis of driving forces behind their disappearance with special attention to the role of hedgerows. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 129, 465–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.026.
  38. Sleptsov, M.M. (1947). The biology of Micromys minutus ussuricus B-Ham (in Russian). Fauna i ekologiya gryzunov. 2. Materialy k poznaniyu fauny ifrory SSSR.
  39. Smart, S.M., Marrs, R.H., Le Duc M.G., Thompson, K., Bunce, R.G.H., Firbank, L.G. & Rosall M.J. (2006). Spatial relationships between intensive land cover and residual plant species diversity in temperate farmed landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol., 43, 1128–1137. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01231.x.
  40. Stanko, M. (1994a). Small mammal communities of windbreaks and adjacent fields in the eastern Slovakia lowlands. Folia Zool., 43, 135–143.
  41. Stanko, M. (1994b). Small mammal communities in agrocenosis of the East Slovakian Lowlands. Poľnohospodárstvo, 40, 596–605.
  42. Stanko, M. & Miklisová D. (1995). Interactions of small mammal communities of windbreaks and adjacent fields with respect to epidemiological aspects. Ekológia( Bratislava), 14, 3–16.
  43. Stanko, M., Mošanský, I., Fričová, J. & Casanova C.J. (1999). Comparison of two sampling methods of small mammals in the margin of a lowland forest. Biologia, 54, 595–597.
  44. Stoate, C., Boatman, N.D., Barralho, R.J., Carvalho, C.R., DeSnoo, G.R. & Eden P. (2001). Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J. Environ. Manag., 63, 337–365. DOI: 10.1006/jema.2001.0473.
  45. Stoate, C., Harper, D., Jarvie, H., Wasiak, K., Williams, P. & Szczur J. (2009). Benefits of grassland livestock production to aquatic ecosystems. Aspects of Applied Biology, 95, 33–38.
  46. Surmacki, A., Gołdyn, G. & Tryjanowski P. (2005). Location and habitat characteristics of the breeding nests of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) in the reed-beds of an intensively used farmland. Mammalia, 69(1), 5–9. DOI: 10.1515/mamm.2005.001.
  47. Szunyoghy, J. (1952). The harvest mouse in Hungary. Part I. Ann. Hist.-Nat. Mus. Natl. Hung., 3, 245–250.
  48. Štollmann, A. & Dudich A. (1984). Hmyzožravce (insectivora) a hlodavce (Rodentia) južnej časti Východoslovenskej nížiny. Zborník Východoslovenského múzea v Košiciach, Prírodné vedy, 24, 127–141.
  49. Štollmann, A. & Dudich A. (1985). Drobné zemné cicavce Burdy a južnej časti Ipeľskej pahorkatiny. Zb. Slov. Nár. Múz. Prír. Vedy, 31, 145–170.
  50. Trout, R.C. (1976). An ecological study of populations of wild Harvest mice (Micromys minutus soricinus Hermann). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
  51. Trout, R.C. (1978a). A review of studies on populations of wild harvest mice (Micromys minutus (Pallas)). Mammal Rev., 8(4), 143–158. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1978.tb00224.x.
  52. Trout, R.C. (1978b). A review of studies on captive harvest mice (Micromys minutus (Pallas)). Mammal Rev., 8(4), 159–175. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1978.tb00225.x.
  53. Vecsernyés, F. (2020). Autumn habitat selection of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus Pallas, 1771) in a rural and fragmented landscape. Rev. Suisse Zool., 126(1), 111–125. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2619526.
  54. Wachtendorf, W. (1951). Contributions to Ecology and Biology of the Dor-mouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) in the Foothills of the Alps. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Syst., 80, 189–204.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2025-0016 | Journal eISSN: 1337-947X | Journal ISSN: 1335-342X
Language: English
Page range: 138 - 146
Submitted on: May 9, 2025
|
Accepted on: Sep 27, 2025
|
Published on: Dec 18, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Branislav Tej, Alexander Csanády, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.