Methodology of Wildlife Underpasses Attractiveness Assessment
References
- Anděl, P., Hlaváč, V. & Lenner R. (2006). Migration objects to ensure the pass-ability of highways and roads for wildlife (in Czech). Praha: Ministerstvo dopravy, odbor pozemních komunikací ČR.
- Beben, D. (2016). Crossings construction as a method of animal conservation. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 474–483. DOI: 10.1016/j. trpro.2016.05.100.
- Bellis, M.A. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of wildlife crossing structures in Southern Vermont. Unpublished master thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA.
- Bhardway, M., Olsson, M. & Seiler A. (2020). Ungulate use of non-wild-life underpasses. J. Environ. Manag., 273, 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111095.32734891
- Choi, T.Y., Yang, B.G., & Woo D.G. (2012). The suitable types and measures of wildlife crossing structures for mammals of Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 21(1), 209–218. DOI: 10.14249/EIA.2012.21.1.209.
- Clevenger, A.P. & Huijser M.P. (2011). Wildlife Crossing Structure Handbook. Design and Evaluation in North America. Publication No. FHWA-CFL/TD-11-003.
- Clevenger, A.P. & Waltho N. (2000). Factors influencing the effectiveness of wildlife underpasses in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada. Conserv. Biol., 14, 47–56. DOI: 10.1046/J.1523-1739.2000.00099-085.X.
- Clevenger, A.P. & Waltho N. (2005). Performance indices to identify attributes of highway crossing structures facilitating movement of large mammals. Biol. Conserv., 121(3), 453–464. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.04.025.
- Denneboom, D., Bar-Massada, A. & Shwartz A. (2021). Factors affecting usage of crossing structures by wildlife – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ., 777, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146061.
- Fabrizio, M.D., Febbraro, M., D’Amico, M., Frate, L., Roscioni, F. & Loy A. (2019). Habitat suitability vs landscape connectivity determining road-kill risk at a regional scale: a case study on European badger (Meles meles). European Journal of Wildlife Research, 65, 7. DOI: 10.1007/s10344-018-1241-7.
- Gibson, L., Lynam, A.J., Bradshaw, C.J.A., He, F. & Bickford D.P. (2013). Near-complite extinction of native small mammal fauna 25 years after forest fragmentation. Science, 341(6153), 1508–1510. DOI: 10.1126/science.1240495.24072921
- Gloyne, C.C. & Clevenger A.P. (2001). Cougar Puma concolor use of wild-life crossing structures on the Trans-Canada highway in Banff National Park, Alberta. Wildl. Biol., 72(2), 117–124. DOI: 10.2981/wlb.2001.009.
- Grilo, C., Bissonette, J.A. & Santos-Reis M. (2008). Response of carnivores to existing highway culverts and underpasses: implications for road planning and mitigation. Biodivers. Conserv., 17, 1685–1699. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-008-9374-8.
- Hlaváč, V. & Anděl P. (2001). Methodical manual for ensuring the passability of highways for wildlife animals (in Czech). Praha: AOPaK ČR.
- Hlaváč, V. & Anděl P. (2008). Bridges over watercourses – ecological aspects and requirements (in Czech). Vysočina: Krajský úřad kraje.
- Hlaváč, V., Anděl, P., Matoušová, J., Dostál, I., Strnad, M., Immerová, B., Kadlečík, J., Meyer, H., Moț, R., Pavelko, A., Hahn, E. & Georgiadis L. (2019). Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians, Guidelines how to minimize the impact of transport infrastructure development on nature in the Carpathian countries. DTP1-187-3.1 TRANSGREEN. Praha: Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic.
- Huck, M., Jędrzejewski, W., Borowik, T., Miłosz-Cielma, M., Schmidt, K., Jędrzejewska, B., Nowak, S. & Mysłajek R.W. (2010). Habitat suitability, corridors and dispersal barriers for large carnivores in Poland. Acta Theriol., 55, 177–192. DOI: 10.4098/j.at.0001-7051.114.2009.
- Ibisch, P.L., Hoffmann, M.T., Kreft, S., Pe’er, G., Kati, V., Biber-Freudenberger, L., DellaSala, D.A., Vale, M.M., Hobson, P.R. & Selva N. (2016). A global map of roadless areas and their conservation status. Science, 354(6318), 1423–1427. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf7166.
- Iuell, B., Bekker, G.J., Cuperus, R., Dufek, J., Fry, G., Hicks, C., Hlaváč, V., Keller, V.B., Rosell, C., Sangwine, T., Tørsløv, N. & Wandall B. le Maire (Eds.) (2003). Wildlife and Traffic: A European Handbook for Identifying Conflicts and Designing Solutions. KNNV Publishers.
- Jędrzejewski, W. & Sidorovich V. (2010). The art of tracking animals. Białowieża: Mammal Research Institute of Polish Academy of Sciences.
- Klescht, V. & Valachovič D. (2002). Protection of animals on roads (in Slovak). Banská Bystrica: State Nature Protection of Slovak Republic.
- Laurance, W.F., Clements, G.R., Sloan, S., O’Connell, C.S., Mueller, N.D., Goosem, M., Venter, O., Edwards, D.P., Phalan, B., Balmford, A., van der Ree, R. & Arrea I.B. (2014). A global strategy for road building. Nature, 513, 229–232. DOI: 10.1038/nature13717.
- Lehotská, B. & Horváthová B. (2009). Functional evaluation of wildlife underpasses under highway D2 in cadastral areas Rusovce and Čunovo (in Slovak). Acta Environmentalica Universitatis Comenianae (Bratislava), 17(1), 71–78.
- Loyd, K.A.T, Hernandez, S.M., Carroll, J.P., Abernathy, K.J. & Marshall G.J. (2013). Quantifying free-roaming domestic cat predation using animal-borne video cameras. Biol. Conserv., 160, 183–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.008.
- MAFE (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and the Environment) (2016). Technical prescriptions for wildlife crossing and fence design (second edition, revised and expanded). Documents for the mitigation of habitat fragmentation caused by transport infrastructure, number 1. Madrid: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and the Environment (Spain).
- Mata, C., Hervaás, I., Herranz, J., Suárez, F. & Malo J.E. (2005). Complementary use by vertebrates of crossing structures along a fenced Spanish motorway. Biol. Conserv., 124(3), 397–405. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.044.
- MTCRD SR (Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development of the Slovak Republic) (2012). Technical conditions No. 02/2012 – Migration structures for wildlife. Part 1: Project engineering, construction, operation, maintenance and repair of ecoducts. Bratislava: Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development of the Slovak Republic.
- Mysłajek, R.W., Olkowska, E., Wronka-Tomulewicz, M. & Nowak S. (2020). Mammal use of wildlife crossing structures along a new motorway in an area recently recolonized by wolves. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 66, 79. DOI: 10.1007/s10344-020-01412-y.
- Nevřelová, M. & Novota M. (2020). Functionality of the ecological network elements from the point of view of mammal migrations in the contact zone of the forest and agricultural landscape. Ekológia (Bratislava), 39(1), 45–57. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2020-0004.
- Ng, S.J., Dole, J.W., Sauvajot, R.M., Riley, S.P.D. & Valone T.J. (2004). Use of highway undercrossing by wildlife in southern California. Biol. Conserv., 115(3), 499–507. DOI: 1016/S0006-3207(03)00166-6.
- Poessel, S.A., Burdett, C.L., Boydston, E.E., Lyren, L.M., Alonso, R.S., Fisher, R.N. & Crooks K.R. (2014). Roads influence movement and home ranges of a fragmentation-sensitive carnivore, the bobcat, in an urban landscape. Biol. Conserv., 180, 224–232. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.010.
- Puig, J., Sanz, L., Serrano, M. & Elosegui J. (2012). Wildlife roadkills and underpass use in northern Spain. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 11(6), 1141–1147.10.30638/eemj.2012.138
- Reck, H., Hänel, K., Strein, M., Georgii, B., Henneberg, M., Peters-Ostenberg, E. & Böttcher M. (2017). Green bridges, wildlife tunnels and fauna culverts – the biodiversity approach. Bonn: Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Germany.
- Rodriquez, A., Crema, G. & Delibes M. (1997). Use of non-wildlife passages across a high speed railway by terrestrial vertebrates. J. Appl. Ecol., 33(6), 1527–1540. DOI: 10.2307/2404791.
- Ružičková, J. (2007). Fragmentation of landscape and biotopes. In M. Kozová et al. Landscape Ecology in Slovakia, Development, Current State and Perspectives (pp. 227–236). Bratislava: Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic, IALE SK, Slovakia.
- Ružičková, J. & Lehotská B. (2008). Possibilities to mitigate negative impact of roads to migration routes of fauna (in Slovak). In A. Daniš & P. Wirthová (Eds.), Urbanistické, architektonické a technické aspekty obnovy vidieka VII (pp. 61–74). Bratislava: STU.
- Ružičková, J. & Lehotská B. (2014). Evaluation and passport of underpasses on the railway line between Pezinok and Báhoň (in Slovak). In P. Fedor & M. Molnárová (Eds.), Nové horizonty environmentálnej ekológie a ochrany životného prostredia (pp. 159–169). Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského.
- Samia, D.S.M., Nakagawa, S., Nomura, F., Rangel, T.F. & Blumstein D.T. (2015). Increased tolerance to humans among disturbed wildlife. Nature Communications, 6, 8877. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9877.466021926568451
- Seidler, R.G., Green, D.S. & Beckmann J.P. (2018). Highways, crossing structures and risk: Behaviors of Greater Yellowstone pronghorn elucidate efficacy of road mitigation. Global Eco. Conserv., 15, e00416. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00416.
- Seiler, A. & Olsson M. (2009). Are non-wildlife passages effective passages for wildlife? In International Conference on Ecology & Transportation (pp. 317–331). 13-17 September 2009, Duluth, Minnesota.
- Seo, H., Choi, C., Lee, K. & Woo D. (2021). Landscape characteristics based on effectiveness of wildlife crossing structures in South Korea. Sustainability, 13, 675. DOI: 10.3390/su13020675.
- Smith, D.J., van der Ree, R. & Rosell C. (2015). Wildlife crossing structures: an effective strategy to restore or maintain wildlife connectivity across roads. In R. van der Ree, D.J. Smith & C. Grilo (Eds.), Handbook of Road Ecology (pp. 172–183). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9781118568170.ch21.
- Valerio, F., Carvalho, F., Barbosa, A.M., Mira, A. & Santos S.M. (2019). Accounting for connectivity uncertainties in predicting roadkills: a comparative approach between path selection functions and habitat suitability models. Environ. Manag., 64, 329–343. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-019-01191-6.31372805
- van der Grift, E.A. & van der Ree R. (2015). Guidelines for evaluating use of wildlife crossing structures. In R. van der Ree, D.J. Smith & C. Grilo (Eds.), Handbook of Road Ecology (pp. 119–128). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9781118568170.ch15
- van der Ree, R., van der Grift, E.A., Gulle, N., Holland, K., Mata, C. & Suarez F. (2007). Overcoming the barrier effect of roads–how effective are mitigation strategies? An international review of the use and effectiveness of underpasses and overpasses designed to increase the permeability of roads for wildlife. In International conference on ecology and transportation (pp. 423-431). Raleighe, North Carolina: Center for Transportation and Environment, North Carolina State University.
- Völk, F., Kalivodová, E., Kalivoda, H., Glitzner, I., Kürthy, A. & Wöss M. (2000). Wildtier-Korridor Alpen-Karpaten slowakischer Teilberiech: Staatsgrenze Österreich bis östlich der Autobahn E 65. Wien: Institut für Wildbiologie und Jagwirtschaft der Universität für Bodenkultur, Bratislava: Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Malacky: Administration of Protected Landscape Area Záhorie.
- Ważna, A., Kaźmierczak, A., Cichocki, J., Bojarski, J. & Gabryś G. (2020). Use of underpasses by animals on a fenced expressway in a suburban area in western Poland. Nature Conservation, 39, 1–18. DOI: 10.3897/natureconservation.39.33967.
Language: English
Page range: 172 - 182
Submitted on: Feb 22, 2022
Accepted on: Apr 15, 2022
Published on: Jul 4, 2022
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2022 Marta Nevřelová, Blanka Lehotská, Jana Ružičková, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.