Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Capacity and flow of selected cultural ecosystem services: Case study of microregion Terchovská valley Cover

Capacity and flow of selected cultural ecosystem services: Case study of microregion Terchovská valley

By: Dominika Kaisová and  Ivan Laco  
Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. Bagstad, K.J., Johnson, G.W., Voigt, B. & Villa F. (2013). Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: a comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosystem Services, 4, 117−125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012.10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012
  2. Barral, M.P., Rey Benayas, J.M., Meli, P. & Maceira N.O. (2015). Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: A global meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 202, 223–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.009.10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.009
  3. Brown, G., Montag, J.M. & Lyon K. (2011). Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Society and Natural Resources, 25(7), 633−651. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2011.621511.10.1080/08941920.2011.621511
  4. Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y. & Műller E. (2014). Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands – concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape Online, 34. DOI: 10.3097/LO.201434.10.3097/LO.201434
  5. Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S. & Műller F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand, and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
  6. Bushell, R. & Eagles P.F. (Eds). (2007). Tourism and protected areas: benefits be yond boundaries: the 5th IUCN World Parks Congress. Oxfordshire: CABI. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/styles/publication/public/book_covers/BC-2007-027.jpg
  7. Chan, K.M.A., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B., Hannahs, B., Levine, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R., Tam, J. & Woodside U. (2012a). Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience, 62(8), 744−756. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7.10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7
  8. Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T. & Goldstein J. (2012b). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8−18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
  9. Clemente, P., Calvache, M., Antunes, P., Santos, R., Cerdeira, J.O. & Martin M.J. (2019). Combining social media photographs and species distribution models to map cultural ecosystem services: The case of a Natural Park in Portugal. Ecological Indicators, 96(1), 59−68. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.043.
  10. Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M.A., Constanza, R., Elmquist, T., Flint, C.G., Gobster, P.H., Gret-Regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, S., Penker, M., Ribe, R.G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg., M., Taczanowska,K., Tam, J. & Von Der Dunk A. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. PNAS, 109(23), 8812–8819. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109.10.1073/pnas.1114773109338414222615401
  11. Dobrovodská, M., Kanka, R., David, S., Kollár, J., Špulerová, J., Štefunková, D., Mojses, M., Petrovič, F., Krištín, A., Stašiov, S., Halada, Ľ. & Gajdoš P. (2019). Assessment of the biocultural value of traditional agricultural landscape on a plot-by-plot level: case studies from Slovakia. Biodivers. Conserv., 28(10), 2615−2645. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-019-01784-x.10.1007/s10531-019-01784-x
  12. Dudley, N. & Stolton S. (2010). Arguments for protected areas: Multiple benefits for conservation and use. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781849774888
  13. Eagles, P.F.J., Mccool, S.F. & Haynes CH.D.A. (2002). Sustainable tourism in protected areas: Guidelines for planning and management. Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN Gland.
  14. Google Maps (2019). https://www.google.sk/maps
  15. Hanley, N., Wright, R.E. & Koop G. (2002). Modelling recreation demand using choice experiments: climbing in Scotland. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22(3), 449−466. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016077425039.10.1023/A:1016077425039
  16. Hermes, J., Albert, CH. & Von Haaren Ch. (2018). Assessing the aesthetic quality of landscapes in Germany. Ecosystem Services, 31, 296−307. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015.10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015
  17. Huang, J., Tichit, M., Poulot, M., Darly, S., Li, S., Petit, C. & Aubry C. (2015). Comparative review of multifunctionality and ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture. J. Environ. Manag., 149, 138–147. DOI: 10.1016/j. jenvman.2014.10.020.
  18. IUCN (2017). Protected areas. https://www.iucn.org/theme/protected-areas/about.
  19. Izakovičová, Z., Špulerová, J. & Petrovič F. (2018). Integrated approach to sus-Špulerová, J. & Petrovič F. (2018). Integrated approach to sus-, J. & Petrovič F. (2018). Integrated approach to sustainable land use management. Environments MDPI, 5(3), 1−16. DOI: 10.3390/environments5030037.10.3390/environments5030037
  20. Jančura, P. & Bohálová I. (2010). Methodology of identification and evaluation of the characteristic appearance of the landscape (in Slovak). Enviromaga zín, 15(6), 18−19.
  21. Kemp, D.R. & Michalk D.L. (2007). Towards sustainable grassland and livestock management. J. Agric. Sci., 145(6), 543−564. DOI: 10.1017/ S0021859607007253.
  22. Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S. & Makeschin F. (2012). A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators, 21, 54−66. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010.
  23. Kubinský, D., Weis, K., Fuska, J., Lehotský, M. & Petrovič F. (2015). Changes in retention characteristics of 9 historical artificial water reservoirs near Banská Štiavnica, Slovakia. Open Geosciences, 7(1), 880−887. DOI: 10.1515/ geo-2015-0056.
  24. Lieskovský, J., Rusňák, T., Klimantová, A., Izsóff, M. & Gašparovičová P. (2017). Appreciation of landscape aesthetic values in Slovakia assessed by social media photographs. Open Geosciences, 9(1). DOI: 10.1515/geo-2017-0044.10.1515/geo-2017-0044
  25. Linnell, J.D.C., Kaczensky, P., Wotschikowsky, U., Lescureux, N. & Boitani L. (2015). Framing the relationship between people and nature in the context of European conservation. Conserv. Biol., 29(4), 978−985. DOI: 10.1111/ cobi.12534.
  26. Manning, R.E., Anderson, L.E. & Pettengill P. (2017). Managing outdoor recrea tion: Case studies in the national parks. CABI.
  27. Mapy CZ (2019). https://sk.mapy.cz/zakladni?x=19.0729779&y=49.2571053&z=9
  28. Mederly, P., Černecký, J., Špulerová, J., Izakovičová, Z., Jančovič, M., Ďuricová, V., Stašová, S., Hreško, J., Petrovič, F., Štefunková, D., Šatalová, B., Močko, M., Vrbičanová, G., Kaisová, D., Turanovičová, M., Kováč, T. & Laco I. (2019). Catalog of ecosystem services (in Slovak). Bratislava: State Nature Protection of the Slovak Republic, Nitra: Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Bratislava: Institute of Landscape Ecology SAS.
  29. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well being: multiscale assessments. Washington: Island Press.
  30. Moyle, B.D., Scherrer, P., Weiler, B., Wilson, E., Caldicott, R. & Nielsen N. (2017). Assessing preferences of potential visitors for nature-based experiences in protected areas. Tourism Management, 62, 29–41. DOI: 10.1016/j. tourman.2017.03.010.
  31. Muñoz, L., Hausner, V., Browm, G., Runge, C. & Fauchald P. (2019). Identifying spatial overlap in the values of locals, domestic - and international tourists to protected areas. Tourism Management, 71, 259−271. DOI: 10.1016/j. tourman.2018.07.015.
  32. OpenStreetMaps (2019). https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/49.2821/18.9112
  33. Othman, N., Mohamed, N. & Ariffin M.H. (2015). Landscape aesthetic values and visiting performance in natural outdoor environment. Proce dia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202, 330−339. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.237.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.237
  34. Palkechová, L. & Kozáková J. (2015). Ekonomika agroturistických prevádzok vo vybraných agrosubjektoch SR. Ekonomika Poľnohospodárstva, 15, 69−85.
  35. Palmer, C. (1999). Tourism and the symbols of identity. Tourism Management, 20(3), 313−321. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00120-4.10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00120-4
  36. Petrovič, F. (2006). Changes of the landscape with dispersed settlement. Ekoló gia (Bratislava), 25(Suppl. 1), 201−211.
  37. Petrovič, F., Bugár, G. & Hreško J. (2009). List of landscape elements mapped in Slovakia (in Slovak). GeoInformation, 5, 112−124.
  38. Petrovič, F. & Muchová Z. (2013). The potential of the landscape with dispersed settlement (Case Study Čadca Town). In J. Fialová & H. Kubíčková (Eds.), Public Recreation and Landscape Protection With Man Hand in Hand? (pp. 199−204). Brno: Mendel University.
  39. Petrovič, F. & Petrikovičová L. (2021). Landscape transformation of small rural settlements with dispersed type of settlement in Slovakia. European Coun tryside, 13(2), 455–478. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-019-01784-x.10.2478/euco-2021-0027
  40. Petrovič, F., Stránovský, P., Muchová, Z., Falťan, V., Skokanová, H., Havlíček, M., Gábor, M. & Špulerová J. (2017). Landscape-ecological optimization of hydric potential in foothills region with dispersed settlements - a case study of Nová Bošáca, Slovakia. Applied Ecology and Environmental Re search, 15(1), 379−400. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1501_379400.
  41. Plieninger, T, Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E. & Bieling C. (2013). Assessing, mapping and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33, 118−129. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013
  42. Schneider, J., Holušová, K., Buchtová, M., Konečný, O., Kozumplíková, A., Lacina, D., Lampartová, I., Lorencová, H., Miškolci, S., Redlichová, R., Venzlů, M. & Vyskot I. (2016). Ecosystem services and forest functions (in Czech). Brno: Mendelova Univerzita.
  43. Smiraglia, D., Ceccarelli, T., Bajocco, S., Perini, L. & Salvati L. (2015). Unraveling landscape complexity: Land use/land cover changes and landscape pattern dynamics (1954-2008) in contrasting peri-urban and agro-forest regions of Northern Italy. Environ. Manag., 56(4), 916−932. DOI: 10.1007/ s00267-015-0533-x.
  44. Špulerová, J., Petrovič, F., Mederly, P., Mojses, M. & Izakovičová Z. (2018). Contribution of traditional farming to ecosystem services provision: Case studies from Slovakia. Land, 7(2), 74. DOI: 10.3390/land7020074.10.3390/land7020074
  45. Štefunková, D., Špulerová, J., Dobrovodská, M., Mojses, M. & Petrovič F. (2013). Traditional agricultural Landscapes - A model of detailed land use mapping. Tájökológiai Lapok, 11(1), 1−21.
  46. Torland, M., Weiler, B., Moyle, B.D. & Wolf I.D. (2015). Are your ducks in a row? External and internal stakeholder perceptions of the benefits of parks in New South Wales, Australia. Managing Sport and Leisure, 20(4), 211−237. DOI: 10.1080/23750472.2015.1028428.10.1080/23750472.2015.1028428
  47. Vandewalle, M., Sykes, M.T., Harrison, P.A., Luck, G.W., Berry, P., Bugter, R., Dawson, T.P., Feld, C.K., Harrington, R., Haslett, J.R., Hering, D., Jones, K.B., Jongamn, R. & Lavorel S. (2009). Review paper on concepts of dy namic ecosystems and their services. The Rubicode Project Rationalising Biodiversity Conservation in Dynamic Ecosystems. http://www.rubicode.net/rubicode/RUBICODE.
  48. Vološčuk, I. (2013). Theoretical principles of ecological processes, functions, and services of ecosystems (in Slovak). Banská Bystrica: Belianum.
  49. Vrbičanová, G., Kaisová, D., Močko, M., Petrovič, F. & Mederly P. (2020). Map- P. (2020). Map- Mapping cultural ecosystem services enables better informed nature protection and landscape management. Sustainability, 12(5), 2138. DOI: 10.3390/ su12052138.
  50. ZBGIS (2019). https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa?bm=zbgis&z=14&c=19.024839,49.285714&sc=n#/meta/base-map/204
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2021-0030 | Journal eISSN: 1337-947X | Journal ISSN: 1335-342X
Language: English
Page range: 276 - 285
Submitted on: Jul 25, 2021
|
Accepted on: Aug 14, 2021
|
Published on: Oct 22, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Dominika Kaisová, Ivan Laco, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.