Factors Associated with Habitat Segregation Among the Four Species of Cervids in the Chitwan National Park, Nepal

Bhattarai, Bishnu Prasad

doi:10.2478/eko-2019-0004

Abstract

Study of habitat segregation among the four species of cervids was conducted in the Chitwan National park of lowland Nepal. This study aimed to investigate the possible mechanisms of habitat partitioning among the four cervids - chital, sambar deer, hog deer and northern red muntjac using discriminant analysis and canonical correlation analysis. Present study considered four major niche dimensions - habitat, human disturbance, presence of predators and seasons. The data were collected by walking along the line transects that encompasses the different habitats, varying degree of human disturbances and frequency of predator’s presence. Results showed the significant effect of season on the habitat segregation among these cervids. There was higher niche overlap during summer season as compared to winter season. Habitat overlap between chital and muntjac was higher and unstable than others, which showed that they were the competitors of the same resources as enlightened by their generalist nature. Therefore, maintaining habitat heterogeneity and minimizing human disturbances will be better solutions for the coexistence of herbivores in the Chitwan National Park and can be an example for similar areas of lowland Nepal.

References

Bagchi, S. (2001). Resource selection and resource partitioning among wild ungulates in the tropical semiarid forest of Ranthambhore National Park, Rajasthan. Masters dissertation, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, India.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bhattarai, B.P. & Kindlmann P. (2012). Habitat heterogeneity as the key determinant of the abundance and habitat preference of prey species of tiger in the Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Acta Theriol., 57, 89–97. DOI: 10.1007/s13364-011-0047-8.10.1007/s13364-011-0047-8
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CNP (2018, June). Biodiversity of the Chitwan National Park.www.chitwannationalpark.gov.np/index.php/biodiversity
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Corbet, G.B. & Hill J.E. (1992). The Mammals of the Indomalayan Region: A Systematic Review. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dhakal, M., Karki, M., Jnawali, S.R., Subedi, N., Pradhan, N.M.B., Malla, S., Lamichhane, B.R., Pokheral, C.P., Thapa, G.J., Oglethorpe, J., Subba, S.A., Bajracharya, P.R. & Yadav H. (2014). Status of tigers and prey in Nepal. Kathmandu: Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Nepal.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dhungel, S.K. & O’Gara B.W. (1991). Ecology of the hog deer in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Wildlife Monograph No. 119. Bethesda: Wildlife Society.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dueser, R.D. & Shugart Jr. H.H. (1978). Microhabitats in a forest-floor small mammal fauna. Ecology, 59, 89‒98. DOI: 10.2307/1936634.10.2307/1936634
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Edge, D.W., Marcum, C.L. & Olson-Edge S.L. (1987). Summer habitat selection by elk in western Montana: A multivariate approach. J. Wildl. Manag., 51, 844‒851.10.2307/3801750
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eisenberg, J.F. (1981). The mammalian radiations: an analysis of trends in evolution, adaptation and behaviour. London: The Athlone Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ellis, J.E. & Swift D.M. (1988). Stability of African pastoral ecosystems: alternate paradigms and implications for development. J. Range Manag., 41, 450‒459. DOI: 10.2307/3899515.10.2307/3899515
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Endo, Y., Takada, H. & Takatsuki S. (2017). Comparison of the food habits of the sika deer (Cervus nippon), the Japanese serow (Capricornis crispus), and the wild boar (Sus scrofa), sympatric herbivorous mammals from Mt. Asama, Central Japan. Mamm. Study, 42, 131‒140. DOI: 10.3106/041.042.0303.10.3106/041.042.0303
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gordon, I.J. & Illius A.W. (1989). Resource partitioning by ungulates in the Isle of Rhum. Oecologia, 79, 383‒389. DOI: 10.1007/BF00384318.10.1007/BF00384318
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Green, M.L., Kelly, A.C., Satterthwaite-Phillips, D., Manjerovic, M.B., Shelton, P., Novakofski, J. & Mateus-Pinilla N. (2017). Reproductive characteristics of female white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the Midwestern USA. Theriogenology, 94, 71‒78. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.02.010.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.02.010
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Green, R.H. (1971). A multivariate statistical approach to the Hutchinsonian niche: Bivalve molluscs of central Canada. Ecology, 52, 543‒556. DOI: 10.2307/1934142.10.2307/1934142
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hardin, G. (1960). The competitive exclusion principle. Science, 131, 1292‒1297. DOI: 10.1126/science.131.3409.1292.10.1126/.131.3409.1292
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hutchinson, G.E. (1968). When are species necessary? In R.C. Lewontin (Ed.), Population biology and evolution (pp. 177‒186). Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Illius, A.W. & O’Connor T.G. (1999). On the relevance of nonequilibrium concepts to semiarid grazing systems. Ecol. Appl., 9, 798‒813. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0798:OTRONC]2.0.CO;2.10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0798:OTRONC]2.0.CO;2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jeffries, M.J. & Lawton J.H. (1984). Enemy-free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biology Journal of Linnean Society, 23, 269–286. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb00145.x.10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb00145.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Levins, R. (1968). Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691209418
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacFaden, S.W. & Capen D.E. (2001). Avian habitat relationships at multiple scales in a New England forest. For. Sci., 48, 243–253. DOI: 10.1093/forestscience/48.2.243.10.1093/forestscience/48.2.243
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marnell, F. (1998). Discriminant analysis of the terrestrial and aquatic habitat determinants of the smooth newt (Triturus vulgaris) and the common frog (Rana temporaria) in Ireland. J. Zool. (Lond.), 244, 1‒6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00001.x.10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00001.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
May, R.M. & MacArthur R.H. (1972). Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 69, 1109‒ 1113. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.69.5.1109.10.1073/pnas.69.5.11094266414504323
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
May, R.M. (1973). Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
May, R.M. (1975). Some notes on estimating the competition matrix α. Ecology, 56, 737‒741. DOI: 10.2307/1935511.10.2307/1935511
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mishra, H.R. (1982). The ecology and behaviour of chital (Axis axis) in the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Palmer, M.W. (1993). Putting things in even better order: The advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology, 74, 2215–2230. DOI: 10.2307/1939575.10.2307/1939575
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pianka, E.R. (1976). Competition and niche theory. In R.M. May (Ed.), Theoretical ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pokharel, K.P., Ludwig, T. & Storch I. (2015). Spatial niche partitioning in sub-tropical solitary ungulates: four-horned antelope and barking deer in Nepal. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0117917. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117917.10.1371/journal.pone.0117917434094425714092
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prater, S.H. (1998). The book of Indian animals. Bombay: Bombay Natural History Society and Oxford University Press, Mumbai, India.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Putman, R.J. (1986). Competition and coexistence in a multispecies grazing system. Acta Theriol., 31, 271‒291.10.4098/AT.arch.86-26
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reinert, H.K. (1984). Habitat separation between sympatric snake populations. Ecology, 65, 478‒486. DOI: 10.2307/1941410.10.2307/1941410
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schaller, G.B. (1967). The deer and the tiger: a study of wildlife in India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schneier, S.M. (1993). Multiple response variables and multispecies interactions. In S.M. Schneier & J. Gurevitch (Eds.), Design and analysis of ecological experiments (pp. 94−112). London: Chapman and Hall.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schoener, T.W. (1974). Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science, 185, 27‒39. DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4145.27.10.1126/.185.4145.27
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schoener, T.W. (1977). Competition and niche. In C. Gans & D. Tinkle (Eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 7 (pp. 35‒136). New York: Academic Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schoener, T.W. (1983). Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am. Nat., 122, 240‒285. DOI: 10.1086/284133.10.1086/284133
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, J.L.D., McDougal, C., Ahearn, S.C., Joshi, A. & Conforti, K. (1999). Metapopulation structure of tigers in Nepal. In J. Seidensticker, S. Christie & P. Jackson (Eds.), Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes (pp. 176–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stoen, O.G. & Wegge P. (1996). Prey selection and prey removal by tiger (Panthera tigris) during the dry season in lowland Nepal. Mammalia, 60, 363–373.10.1515/mamm-1996-0303
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ter Braak, C.J.F. (1986). Canonical correspondence analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct analysis. Ecology, 67, 1167–1179. DOI: 10.2307/1938672.10.2307/1938672
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ter Braak, C.J.F. & Prentice I.C. (1988). A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res., 18, 271–317. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60183-X.10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60183-X
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ter Braak, C.J.F. & Šmilauer P. (2002). CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Wageningen/České Budějovice: Biometris.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tobler, M.W., Carrillo-Percastegui, S.E. & Powell G. (2009). Habitat use, activity patterns and use of mineral licks by five species of ungulate in south-eastern Peru. J. Trop. Ecol., 25, 261‒270. DOI: 10.1017/S0266467409005896.10.1017/S0266467409005896
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Toft, C.A. (1985). Resource partitioning in amphibians and reptiles. Copeia, 1985, 1‒21. DOI: 10.2307/1444785.10.2307/1444785
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Venables, W.N. & Ripley B.D. (1994). Modern applied statistics with S-Plus. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4899-2819-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Voeten, M.M. & Prins H.H.T. (1999). Resource partitioning between sympatric wild and domestic herbivores in the Tarangire region of Tanzania. Oecologia, 120, 287‒294. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050860.10.1007/s00442005086028308091
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang, J., Wang, P., Aryal, A., Meng, X., & Weladji, R.B. (2018). Summer habitat selection of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) governs on the unprotected forest and human interface in china. Ekológia (Bratislava), 37(2), 112–121. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2018-0011.10.2478/eko-2018-0011
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wei, F., Feng, Z., Wang, Z. & Hu J. (2000). Habitat use and separation between the giant panda and the red panda. J. Mammal., 81, 448‒455. DOI: 10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<;0448:HUASBT>2.0.CO;2.10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<;0448:HUASBT>2.0.CO;2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Werner, E.E., Gilliam, J.F., Hall, D.F. & Mittelbach G.G. (1983). An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology, 64, 1540‒1548. DOI: 10.2307/1937508.10.2307/1937508
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wiens, J.A. (1977). On competition and variable environments: populations may experience “ecological crunches” in variable climates, nullifying the assumptions of competition theory and limiting the usefulness of short-term studies of population patterns. Am. Sci., 65, 592‒597. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27848086
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wikramanayake, E., Dinerstein, E., Loucks, C., Olson, D., Morrison, J., Lamoreux, J., McKnight, M. & Hedao P. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the Indo-Pacific: A conservation assessment. Washington: Island Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Factors Associated with Habitat Segregation Among the Four Species of Cervids in the Chitwan National Park, Nepal

Abstract

Paradigm

My account