Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Estimation of benefits from the actual use of inland water ecosystem services in the Slovak Republic Cover

Estimation of benefits from the actual use of inland water ecosystem services in the Slovak Republic

Open Access
|Sep 2018

References

  1. Austin, D., Cerman, G., Heywood, T., Marshall, R., Refling, K. & Van Patter L. (2012). Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services. Ontario: University of Guelph.
  2. Bechtel, R.B. & Churchman A. (Eds.) (2002). Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: J. Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  3. Boyd, J. & Banzhaf S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63, 616–626. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
  4. Brouwer, R. (2004). The concept of environmental and resource costs. Lessons learned from ECO2. In R. Brouwer & P. Strosser (Eds.), Environmental and resource costs and the Water Framework Directive. An overview of European practices (pp. 3−12). Workshop Proc. RIZA, Lelystad.
  5. Brouwer, R. (2008). The potential role of stated preference methods in the water framework directive to assess disproportionate costs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(5), 597–614. DOI: 10.1080/09640560802207860.10.1080/09640560802207860
  6. Bujnovský, R. (2015). Evaluation the ecosystem services of inland waters in the Slovak Republic – to date findings. Ekológia (Bratislava), 34(1), 19–25. DOI: 10.1515/eko-2015-0003.10.1515/eko-2015-0003
  7. Bujnovský, R. & Vilček J. (2011). Soil degradation and soil value in Slovakia – Two problems with common denominator. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 76(1), 9–14.
  8. Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S. & Müller F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
  9. Cooper, N., Brady, E., Steen, H. & Bryce R. (2016). Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: Recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 21, 218–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.014.10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.014
  10. COWI (2014a). Support policy development for integration of an ecosystem services approach with WFD and FD implementation. Resource document. Kongens Lyngby: COWI A/S.
  11. COWI (2014b). Support policy development for integration of an ecosystem services approach with WFD and FD implementation. Resource document – Annex report. Kongens Lyngby: COWI A/S.
  12. DeGroot, R., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L. & Willemen L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7, 260–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
  13. DeGroot, R., Brander, L., Van der Ploeg, S., Constanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., Christie, M., Crossman, N., Ghermandi, A., Hein, L., Hussain, S., Kumar, P., McVittie, A., Portela, R., Rodriguez, L.C., ten Brink, P. & Van Beukering P. (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services. Ecosystem Services, 1, 50–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005.10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005
  14. De Miranda Coelha, J.-A.P., Gouveira, V.V., de Souza, G.H.S., Milfont, T.L. & Barros B.N.R (2016). Emotions toward water consumption: Conservation and wastage. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48, 117–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.rlp.2015.09.006.10.1016/j.rlp.2015.09.006
  15. EEA (2015). The European environmentstate and outlook 2015: synthesis report. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
  16. Elsin, Y.K., Kramer, R.A. & Jenkins W.A. (2010). Valuing drinking water provision as an ecosystem service in the Neuse river basin. Journal of Water Research, Planning and Management, 136, 474–482. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.000005810.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000058
  17. Farber, S., Constanza, R., Childers, D.L., Erickson, J., Gross, K., Grove, M., Hopkinson, Ch.S., Kahn, J., Pincetl, S., Troy, A., Warren, P. & Wilson M. (2006). Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. BioScience, 56(2), 121–133. DOI:10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0121:LEAEFE]2.0.CO;210.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0121:LEAEFE]2.0.CO;2
  18. Gomez-Baggethun, E. & Ruiz Pérez M. (2011). Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography, 35, 613−628. DOI: 10.1177/0309133311421708.10.1177/0309133311421708
  19. Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynauld, A., Rankinen, K., Hellsten, S., Forsius, M. & Cardoso A.C. (2015a). Cook-book for water ecosystem service assessment and valuation. JRC science and policy report. Ispra: JRC.
  20. Grizzetti, B., Passy, P., Billen, G., Bouraoui, F., Garnier, J. & Lassaletta L. (2015b). The role of water nitrogen retention in integrated nutrient management: assessment in a large basin using different modelling approaches. Environmental Research Letters, 10, 065008.10.1088/1748-9326/10/6/065008
  21. Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynaud, A. & Cardoso A.C. (2016). Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environmental Science and Policy, 61, 194–203. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008.10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008
  22. Grossmann, M. (2012). Economic value of the nutrient retention function of restored floodplain wetlands in the Elbe river basin. Ecological Economics, 83, 108–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.00810.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.008
  23. Gunkel, G., Lima, D., Selge, F., Sobral, M. & Calado S. (2015). Aquatic ecosystem services of reservoirs in semiarid areas: sustainability and reservoir management. In WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment (River Basin Management VIII), 197, 187−200.10.2495/RM150171
  24. Hahn, T., McDermott, C., Ituarte-Lima, C., Schultz, M., Green, T. & Tuvendal M. (2015). Purposes and degrees of commodification: Economic instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services need not rely on markets or monetary valuation. Ecosystem Services, 16, 74–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.012.10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.012
  25. Haines-Young, R. & Potschin M. (2013). CICES V4.3 - Revised report prepared following consultation on CICES Version 4. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003. University of Nottingham: Centre for Environmental Management.
  26. Chee, Y.E. 2004. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biol. Conserv., 120, 549−565. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.028.10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.028
  27. Keeler, B.L., Polasky, S., Brauman, K., Johnson, K.A., Finlay, J.C., O´Neil, A., Kovacs, K. & Danzell B. (2012). Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Pro. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109(45), 18619–18624. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4182996110.1073/pnas.1215991109349493223091018
  28. La Note, A., Maes, J., Grizzetti, B., Bouraoui, F. & Zulian G. (2012). Spatially explicit monetary valuation of water purification services in the Mediterranean bio-physical region. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 8(1−2), 26–34. DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2011.64555710.1080/21513732.2011.645557
  29. La Note, A., Maes, J., Dalmazzone, S., Crossman, N.D., Grizzetti, B. & Bidoglio G. (2017). Physical and monetary ecosystem service accounts for Europe: A case study for in-stream nitrogen retention. Ecosystem Services, 23, 18–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.002.10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.002535181428344928
  30. Maes, J., Braat, L., Jax, K., Hutchins, M., Furman, E., Termansen, M., Luque, S., Paracchini, M.L., Chauvin, Ch., Williams, R., Volk, M., Lautenbach, S., Kopperoinen, L., Schelhaas, M.-J., Weinert, J., Goossen, M., Dumont, E., Strauch, M., Görg, Ch., Dormann, C., Katwinkel, M., Zulian, G., Varjopuro, R., Ratamäki, O., Hauck, J., Forsius, M., Hengeveld, G., Perez-Soba, M., Bouraoui, F., Scholz, M., Schulz-Zunkel, Ch., Lepistö, A., Polishchuk, Y. & Bidoglio G. (2011). A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: methods, case studies and policy analysis - phase 1. PEER Report No 3. Ispra: Partnership for European Environmental Research.
  31. Maes, J., Liquete, C., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Paracchini, L.M., Barredo, J.I., Grizzetti, B., Cardoso, A., Somma, F., Petersen, J.E., Meiner, A., Gelabert, E.R., Zal, N., Kristensen, P., Bastrup-Birk, A., Biala, K., Piroddi, Ch., Egoh, B., Degeorges, P., Fiorina, Ch., Santos-Martín, F., Naruševičius, V., Verboven, J., Pereira, H.M., Bengsson, J., Gocheva, K., Marta-Pedroso, C., Snäll, T., Estreguil, Ch., San-Miguewl-Ayanz, J., Péres-Soba, M., Grêt-Regamey, A., Lillebø, A.I., Malak, D.A., Condré, S., Moen, J., Czúcz, B., Drakou, E.G., Zulian, G. & Lavalle C. (2016). An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Ecosystem Services, 17, 14–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023.10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
  32. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  33. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MoA & RD) (2013). Multiannual National Strategic Plan for the Development of Aquaculture of the Slovak Republic for period 2014-2020 (in Slovak). Bratislava: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.
  34. Ministry of Environment (2011). Concept of utilization of hydropower potential of watercourses of the Slovak Republic by 2030 (in Slovak). Bratislava: Ministry of Environment.
  35. Morris, J. & Camino M. (2011). Economic assessment of freshwater, wetland and floodplain (FWF) ecosystem services. UK NEA Economics analysis report. Bedford: School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield University.
  36. Morvay, K., Frank, K., Gabrielová, H., Hudcovský, M., Hvozdíková, V., Jeck, T. & Šikulová I. (2014). Economic development of Slovakia in 2013 and outlook to 2015 (in Slovak). Bratislava: Ekonomický ústav SAV.
  37. National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training (NCGRT) (2013). Economic value of groundwater in Australia. Kingston : Deloitte Access Economics.
  38. OECD (2017). Tackling environmental problems with the help of behavioural insights. Paris: OECD Publishing.10.1787/9789264273887-en
  39. Rode, M., Hartwig, M., Wagenschein, D., Kebede, T. & Borchardt D. (2015). The importance of hyporheic zone processes on ecological functioning and solute transport of streams and rivers. In L. Chicharo, F. Müller & N. Fohrer (Eds.), Ecosystem services and river basin ecohydrology. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Media B.V.10.1007/978-94-017-9846-4_4
  40. Rohani, M. (2013). Freshwater values framework. A review of water valuation methods utilized within total economic valuation. Auckland Council working report WR2013/001. Auckland: Auckland Council.
  41. Seifert-Dähnn, I., Barkved, L.J. & Interwies E. (2015). Implementation of the ecosystem service concept in water management – Challenges and ways forward. Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology, 5, 3–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.swaqe.2015.01.007.10.1016/j.swaqe.2015.01.007
  42. Seitzinger, S., Harrison, J.A., Böhlke, J.K., Bouwman, A.F., Lowrance, R., Peterson, B., Tobias, C. & van Drecht, G. (2006). Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis. Ecol. Appl., 16(6), 2064−2090. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:DALAWA]2.0.CO;210.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:DALAWA]2.0.CO;2
  43. Seják, J., Cudlín, P., Pokorný, J., Zapletal, M., Petříček, V., Guth, J., Chuman, T., Romportl, D., Skořepová, I., Vacek, V., Vyskot, I., Černý, K., Hesslerová, P., Burešová, R., Prokopová, M., Plch, R., Engstová, B. & Stará L. (2010). Evaluation of ecosystem functions and services in Czech Republic (in Czech). Ústí nad Labem: Fakulta životního prostředí UJEP.
  44. Schröter, M., Van der Zanden, E., Van Oudenhoven, A.P.E., Remme, R.P., Serna-Chavez, H.M., de Groot, R.S. & Opdam P. (2014). Ecosystem services as a contested concept: A synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conservation Letters, 7(6), 514−523. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12091.10.1111/conl.12091
  45. Stern P.C. (2000). Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist, 55, 523−530. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.523.10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.523
  46. Vlachopoulou, M., Coughlin, D., Forrow, D., Kirk, S., Logan, P. & Voulvoulis N. (2014). The potential of using the ecosystem approach in the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Sci. Total Environ., 470−471, 684−694. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.072.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.072
  47. Ward, F.A. & Michelsen A. (2002). The economic value of water in agriculture: concepts and policy applications. Water Policy, 4, 423−446.10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00039-9
  48. Wollheim, W.M., Vörösmarty, C.J., Peterson, B.J., Seitzinger, S.P. & Hopkinson C.S. (2006). Relationship between river size and nutrient removal. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L06410. DOI: 10.1029/2006GL025845.10.1029/2006GL025845
  49. WWAP - United Nations World Water Assessment Programme (2014). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2014. Water and energy. Paris: UNESCO.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2018-0017 | Journal eISSN: 1337-947X | Journal ISSN: 1335-342X
Language: English
Page range: 201 - 218
Published on: Sep 1, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Radoslav Bujnovský, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.