Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Landscape Capacity for Ecosystem Services Provision Based on Expert Knowledge and Public Perception (Case Study from the Northwest Slovakia) Cover

Landscape Capacity for Ecosystem Services Provision Based on Expert Knowledge and Public Perception (Case Study from the Northwest Slovakia)

Ekológia (Bratislava)
Volume 33 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Dec 2014
References

References

  1. Agbenyega, O., Burgess, P.J., Cook, M. & Morris J. (2009). Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands.26, 551-557. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.011.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Ayumi, Y. & Chanhda H. (2009). Ecosystem Service Values and Land Use Change in Trans-Boundary National Bio- diversity Conservation Areas (NBCA): A Case study of Phou Dean Din NBCA, Lao PDR. http://www.esee2009. si/ESEE2009.html.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F. & Windhorst W. (2009). Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services—a concept for land-cover based assessments.15, 1-22. DOI: 10.3097/LO.200915.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S. & Müller F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply demand and budgets21, 17-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Costanza, R., DArge, R., de Groot, R.S., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P. & van den Belt M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital.387(6630), 253-260.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Daily, G.C., Söderqvist, T, Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P.R., Folke, C., Jansson, A., Jansson, B., Kaut- sky N., Levin, S., Lubchenco, J., Mäler, K., Simpson, D., Starrett, D., Tilman, D. & Walker B. (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value.289, 395-396. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5478.395.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. de Groot, R.S., Wilson, M. & Boumans R. (2002). A typology for the description, classification, and valuation 352 of ecosystem functions, goods and services.41(3), 393-408. DOI: 10.1016/S0921- 8009(02)00089-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., López-Santiago, C.A., Aguilera, P.A. & Montes C. (2012). The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach.19-20, 136-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.006.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Hartter, J. (2010). Resource use and ecosystem services in a forest park landscape.23, 207-223. DOI: 10.1080/08941920903360372.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. HreŠko, J., Mederly P. & PetroviČ F. (2003). Landscape-ecological research with support of GIS tools in preparation of landscape-ecological plan (model area of the Považská Bystrica city).22(Suppl. 2), 195-212.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Iverson, L., Echeverria, C, Nahuelhual, L. & Luque S. (2014). Ecosystem services in changing landscapes: An intro- duction.29(2), 181-186. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-9993-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Kelemen, E., Nguyen, G., Gomiero, T., Kovács, E., Choisis, J.P., Choisis, N., Paoletti, M.G., Podmaniczky L., Ry- schawy J., Sarthou, J.P., Herzog, F., Dennis, P. & Balázs K. (2013). Farmers’ perceptions of biodiversity: Lessons from a discourse-based deliberative valuation study35, 318-328. DOI: 10.1016/j.landuse- pol.2013.06.005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Konarska, K.M., Sutton, PC. & Castellon M. (2002). Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets.41, 491-507. DOI: 10.1016/ S0921-8009(02)00096-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Kopperoinen, L., Itkonen, P. & Niemelä J. (2014). Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology29(8), 1361-1375. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Lewan, L. & Söderqvist T (2002). Knowledge and recognition of ecosystem services among the general public in a drainage basin in Scania, Southern Sweden.42, 459-467. DOI: 10.1016/S0921- 8009(02)00127-1. Limburg, K.E. & Folke C. (1999). The ecology of ecosystem services: introduction to the special issue.29, 179-182. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00008-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., García Del Amo, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Oteros-Rozas, E., Palacios-Agundez, I., Willaarts, B., González, J.A., Santos-Martín, F., Onaindia, M., López-Santiago, C.A. & Montes C. (2012). Uncovering ecosystem services bun-dles through social preferences.e38970. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0038970.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Maynard, S., James, D. & Davidson A. (2010). The development of an ecosystem services framework for South East Queensland.45(5), 881-895. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9428-z.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Metzger, M.J., Rounsevell, M.D.A., Acosta-Michlik, L., Leemans, R. & Schröter D. (2006). The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change.114, 69-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.025.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2003).Washington: World Resources Institute.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. PetroviČ, F. & Muchová Z. (2013). The potential of the landscape with dispersed settlement: Case study Čadca town. In J. Fialová & H. KubíČková (Eds.),(pp. 199-204). Proceedings from Scientific Conference May 1-3, 2013 Brno. Brno: Mendelova Univerzita.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Schröter, D., Cramer, W, Leemans, R., Prentice, I.C., Araújo, M.B., Arnell, N.W, Bondeau, A., Bugmann, H., Carter, T.R., Gracia, C.A., de la Vega-Leinert, A.C., Erhard, M., Ewert, F., Glendining, M., House, J.I., Kankaanpää, S., Klein, R.J.T., Lavorel, S., Lindner, M., Metzger, M.J., Meyer, J., Mitchell, T.D., Reginster, I., Rounsevell, M., Sabaté, S., Sitch, S., Smith, B., Smith, J., Smith, P., Sykes, M.T., Tonicke, K., Tuiller, W, Tuck, G., Zae-hle, S. & Zierl B. (2005). Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe.310, 1333-1337. DOI: 10.1126/science.1115233.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Seják, J., Cudlín, P., Pokorný, J., Zapletal, M., PetŘíČek, V., Guth, J., Chuman, T, Romportl, D., SkoŘepová, I., Vacek, V., Vyskot, I., Černý, K., Hesslerová, P., BureŠová, R., Prokopová, M., Plch, R., Engstová, B. & Stará L. (2010). Hodnocení funkcí a služeb ekosystémě ČeskéÚstí nad Labem: Fakulta životního prostŘedí UJEP. http://fzp.ujep.cz/projekty/HodnoceniFunkciASluzebEkosystemuCR.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Wilson, M.A. & Howarth R.B. (2002). Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation.41, 431-443. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00092-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Yapp, G., Walker, J. & Tackway R. (2010). Linking vegetation type and condition to ecosystem goods and services.7(3), 292-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.008.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2014-0031 | Journal eISSN: 1337-947X | Journal ISSN: 1335-342X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 344 - 353
Published on: Dec 10, 2014
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
ecosystem services,
land cover types,
social preferences,
assessment
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Chemistry, other,
Geosciences,
Geography,
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2014 Peter Bezák, Magdaléna Bezáková, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 33 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
Previous article
Next article