Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Soil Heterogeneity Reflected in Biogeography of Beech Forests in the Borderland Between the Bohemian Massif and the Outer Western Carpathians Cover

Soil Heterogeneity Reflected in Biogeography of Beech Forests in the Borderland Between the Bohemian Massif and the Outer Western Carpathians

Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. Allison, F.E. (1973). Soil organic matter and its role in crop production. Amsterdam, London: Elsevier.
  2. Barbati, A., Corona, P. & Marchetti M. (2007). European forest types. Categories and types for sustainable forest man-agement reporting and policy. Copenhagen, Luxembourg: European Environment Agency.
  3. Berger, T.W. & Hager H. (2000). Physical top soil properties in pure stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and mixed species stands in Austria. For. Ecol. Manag., 136, 159-172. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00286-8.10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00286-8
  4. Borken, W., Xu, Y.-J., Davidson, E.A. & Beese F. (2002). Site and temporal variation of soil respiration in European beech, Norway spruce, and Scots pine forests. Global Change Biology, 8(12), 1205-1216. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365- 2486.2002.00547.x.
  5. Box, G.E.P. & Cox D.R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B, 26, 211-246. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2984418.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x
  6. BuČek, A., Maděra, P. & ÚŘadníČek L. (2007). Ecological network creation in the Czech Republic. Journal of Land-scape Ecology, 1: 12-24.
  7. Casper, B.B. & Jackson R.B. (1997). Plant competition underground. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 28, 545-570. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.545.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.545
  8. Christensen, M., Hahn, K., Mountford, E. P., Ódor, P., Standová, T, Rozenbergar, D., Diaci, J., Wijdeven, S., Meyer, P., Winter, S. & VrŠka T (2005). Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves. For. Ecol.Manag., 210, 267-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032.10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032
  9. Cienciala, E., Exnerová, Z., Mackě, J. & Henžlík V. (2006). Forest topsoil organic carbon content in Southwest Bo- hemia region. J. For. Sci., 52, 387-398.10.17221/4519-JFS
  10. Chytrý, M. (2012). Vegetation of the Czech Republic: diversity ecology, history and dynamics. Preslia, 84, 427-504.
  11. Chytrý, M., KuČera, T. & KoČí M. (Eds.) (2001). Katalog biotopů České republiky. Praha: AOPK ČR.
  12. Craine, J.M. (2007). Plant strategy theories: replies to Grime and Tilman. J. Ecol, 95, 235-240. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2745.2007.01212.x.
  13. Culek, M. (Ed.) (1996). Biogeografické Členění České republiky. Praha: Enigma.
  14. Davi, H., Dufrêne, E., Granier, A., Le Dantec, V., Barbaroux, C, Francois, C. & Bréda N. (2005). Modelling carbon and water cycles in a beech forest. Part II: Validation of the main processes form organ to stand scale. Ecol.Model., 185, 387-407. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.003.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.003
  15. Demek, J. (1987). Hory a nížiny. Zeměpisný lexikon ČSR. Praha: Academia.
  16. Diaci, J. & Rozenbergar D. (2003). Interactions of light, soil properties and regeneration in the Slovenian Dinaric Alps: Patterns in virgin and managed forests. In F. Hamor & B. Commarmot (Eds.), Natural forests in the tem-perate zone of Europe - values and utilization (pp. 58-59). Mukachevo, Rakhiv, Birmensdorf: Carpathian Bio- sphere Reserve, Swiss Federal Research Institute.
  17. Driessen, P., Deckers, J. & Nachtergaele F. (Eds.) (2001). Lecture notes on the major soils of the world. Rome: FAO.
  18. Ellenberg, H. (1996). Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer und historischer Sicht. Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer GmbH.
  19. Finzi, A.C., Canham, CD. & van Breemen N. (1998). Canopy tree soil interactions within temperate forests: Species efects on pH and cations. Ecol. Appl., 8, 447-454. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0447:CTSIWT]2.0.CO;2
  20. Fitzsimmons, K.E., Markoviě, S.B. & Hambach U. (2012). Pleistocene environmental dynamics recorded in the loess of the middle and lower Danube basin. Quaternary Science Reviews, 41, 104-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.quasci- rev.2012.03.002.
  21. Gaston, K.J. & Spicer J.I. (2004). Biodiversity: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  22. Gégout, J.-C. & Križová E. (2003). Comparison of indicator values of forest understory plant species in Western Carpathians (Slovakia) and Vosges Mountains (France). For. Ecol. Manag., 182, 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/S0378- 1127(03)00068-9.
  23. Godefroid, S., Massant, W. & Koedam N. (2005). Variation in the herb species response and the humus quality across a 200-year chronosequence of beech and oak plantations in Belgium. Ecography, 28, 223-235. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03877.x.10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03877.x
  24. Gömöry, D., Hynek, V. & Paule V. (1998). Original article Delineation of seed zones for European beech (Fa-gus sylvatica L.) in the Czech Republic based on isozyme gene markers. Ann. For. Sci., 55, 425-436. DOI: 10.1051/forest:19980403.10.1051/forest:19980403
  25. Green, R.N., Trowbridge, R.L. & Klinka K. (1993). Towards a taxonomic classification of humus forms. For. Sci. (Monograph 29), 39(Suppl. 1), a0001-z0002.10.1093/forestscience/39.s1.a0001
  26. Grunda, B. (1993). Objemová hmotnost pědy v půdní mikrobiologii. Lesnictví-Forestry, 41, 38-41.
  27. HoráČek, M., HoluŠa, O. & Samec P. (2011). Line of border of the Polonic and Westcarpathian biogeographical sub- provinces in the Czech Republic. Acta Musei Beskidensis, 3, 17-31.
  28. Houba, V.G.J., van der Lee, J.J., Novozamsky I. & Walinga I. (1989). Soil analysis procedures. Soil and plant analysis, Part 5. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.
  29. Kaplan, Z. (2012). Flora and phytogeography of the Czech Republic. Preslia, 84, 505-573.
  30. Knollová, I. & Chytrý M. (2004). Oak-hornbeam forests of the Czech Republic: geographical and ecological ap- proaches to vegetation classification. Preslia, 76, 291-311.
  31. KuČera, A., RejŠek, K., Dundek, P., Marosz, K., Samec, P. & Sýkora J. (2011). Specification of the beechwood soil environment based on chosen soil properties, aiming at the Faseta paupera habitat. J. For. Sci., 57, 185-191.10.17221/66/2010-JFS
  32. Lisá, L. & Uher P. (2006). Provenance of Würmian loess and loess-like sediments of Moravia and Silesia (Czech Republic): a study of zircon typology and cathodoluminiscence. Geol. Carpathica, 57, 397-403.
  33. Magri, D., Vendramin, G.G., Comps, B., Dupanloup, I., Geburek, T., Gömöry D., LataŁowa, M., Litt, T., Paule, L., Roure, J.M., Tantau, I., van der Knaap, W.O., Petit, R.J. & de Beaulieu J.-L. (2006). A new scenario for the Quarternary history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. NewPhytol., 171, 199-221. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x
  34. Ngao, J., Epron, D., Brechet, C. & Granier A. (2005). Estimating the contribution of leaf litter decomposi- tion to soil CO2 efux in a beech forest using 13C-depleted litter. Global Change Biology, 11(10), 1768-1776. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.01014.x.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.01014.x
  35. Patzel, N. & Ponge J.-F. (2001). The heterogeneity of humus components in a virgin beech forests. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 37, 117-124. DOI: 10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01076-7.10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01076-7
  36. Pott, R. (2000). Palaeoclimate and vegetation - long-term vegetation dynamics in central Europe with particular reference to beech. Phytocoenologia, 30, 285-333. DOI: 10.1127/phyto/30/2000/285.10.1127/phyto/30/2000/285
  37. Purdon, M., Cienciala, E., Metelka, V., Beranová, J., Hunová, I. & Černý M. (2004). Regional variation in forest health under long-term air pollution mitigated by lithological conditions. For. Ecol. Manag., 195, 355-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.039.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.039
  38. Qian, H. & Ricklefs R.E. (2004). Geographical distribution and ecological coservatism of disjunct genera of vascular plants in eastern Asia and eastern North America. J. Ecol, 92, 253-265. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00868.x.10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00868.x
  39. Rand, W.M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American StatisticalAssociation, 66, 846-850. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1971.10482356.10.1080/01621459.1971.10482356
  40. Seynave, I., Gégout, J.-G., Hervé, J.-C, Dhôte, J.-F., 2008: Is the spatial distribution of European beech (Fagus syl-vatica L.) limited by its potential height growth? Journal of Biogeography 35: 1851-1862. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2699.2008.01930.x.
  41. Schmid, I. (2002). The influence of soil type and interspecific competition of the fine root system of Norway spruce and European beech. Basic and Applied Ecology, 3, 339-346. DOI: 10.1078/1439-1791-00116.10.1078/1439-1791-00116
  42. Simon, J. (Ed.) (2003). Monitorovací plochy soustavy NATURA 2000 v České republice (1. Část). Brno: Paido. Simon, J. (2004). Management strategies on territories with special status of protection in the Czech Republic. J. For.Sci., 50, 510-513.10.17221/4648-JFS
  43. Simon, J. (Ed.) (2010). Strategie managementu lesních území se zvláŠtním statutem ochrany. Obecná Část I. Kostelec nad Černými lesy: Lesnická práce.
  44. Sugiero, D., Jaszczak, R., Rączka, G., Strzelinski, P., Węgiel, A. & Wierzbicka A. (2009). Species composition in low mountain beech (Fagus sylvatica) stands in the Bieszczady National Park under the global warming. J. For. Sci., 55, 244-250.10.17221/15/2009-JFS
  45. Svobodová, H., Reille, M. & Goeury C. (2001). Past vegetation dynamics of Vltavský luh, upper Vltava river valley in th Šumava mountains. Czech Republic. Veg. Hist. Archaebot, 10, 185-199. DOI: 10.1007/PL00006930.10.1007/PL00006930
  46. Tan, K.H. (2003). Humic matter in soil and the environment: principles and controversies. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.10.1201/9780203912546
  47. USDA-NRSC (1996). Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Washington.
  48. van der Poel, P.W. (1976). Influence of environmental factors in the growth of the beech. Catena, 3, 203-214. DOI: 10.1016/0341-8162(76)90010-2.10.1016/0341-8162(76)90010-2
  49. VavŘíČek, D., Šimková, P., Samec, P. & Formánek P. (2006). Soil aspects of forest site revitalization afer windrow cultivation by heavy mechanization on the KruŠné hory Mts. Plateau. J. For. Sci., 52, 1-12.
  50. Verdú, M., Dávila, P., García-Fayos, P., Flores-Hernandes, N. & Valiente-Banuet A. (2003). ’Convergent’ traits of Mediterranean woody plants belong to pre-mediterranean linkage. Biol. J. Linn. Soc, 78, 415-427. DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00160.x.10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00160.x
  51. Viewegh, J. (2002). South-Moravian foodplain forest herb vegetation in the period 1978-1997. J. For. Sci., 48, 88-92.10.17221/11859-JFS
  52. Voženílek, V. (2000). Regionální Členění reliéfu ČR, mapa 1: 1 250 000. Olomouc: Katedra geografe UP Olomouc.
  53. Walkley A. & Black I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjaref method for determinating soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 37, 29-38.10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  54. Wheeler, P.A. & Ward R.B. (1998). Te non-toxic farming handbook. Austin: Acres U.S.A.
  55. White, R.E. (1987). Introduction to the principles and practice of soil science. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publica- tions.
  56. Zar, J. (1994). Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Int.
  57. Zinke, P.J. (1962). The pattern of influence of individual forest trees on soil properties. Ecology, 43, 130-133. DOI: 10.2307/1932049.10.2307/1932049
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2014-0030 | Journal eISSN: 1337-947X | Journal ISSN: 1335-342X
Language: English
Page range: 321 - 343
Published on: Dec 10, 2014
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2014 Pavel Samec, Aleš Kučera, Klement Rejšek, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.