Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Soil Heterogeneity Reflected in Biogeography of Beech Forests in the Borderland Between the Bohemian Massif and the Outer Western Carpathians Cover

Soil Heterogeneity Reflected in Biogeography of Beech Forests in the Borderland Between the Bohemian Massif and the Outer Western Carpathians

Ekológia (Bratislava)
Volume 33 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Dec 2014
References

References

  1. Allison, F.E. (1973).Amsterdam, London: Elsevier.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Barbati, A., Corona, P. & Marchetti M. (2007).Copenhagen, Luxembourg: European Environment Agency.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Berger, T.W. & Hager H. (2000). Physical top soil properties in pure stands of Norway spruceand mixed species stands in Austria.136, 159-172. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00286-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Borken, W., Xu, Y.-J., Davidson, E.A. & Beese F. (2002). Site and temporal variation of soil respiration in European beech, Norway spruce, and Scots pine forests.8(12), 1205-1216. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365- 2486.2002.00547.x.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Box, G.E.P. & Cox D.R. (1964). An analysis of transformations.26, 211-246. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2984418.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. BuČek, A., Maděra, P. & ÚŘadníČek L. (2007). Ecological network creation in the Czech Republic.1: 12-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Casper, B.B. & Jackson R.B. (1997). Plant competition underground.28, 545-570. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.545.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, M., Hahn, K., Mountford, E. P., Ódor, P., Standová, T, Rozenbergar, D., Diaci, J., Wijdeven, S., Meyer, P., Winter, S. & VrŠka T (2005). Dead wood in European beechforest reserves.210, 267-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Cienciala, E., Exnerová, Z., Mackě, J. & Henžlík V. (2006). Forest topsoil organic carbon content in Southwest Bo- hemia region.52, 387-398.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Chytrý, M. (2012). Vegetation of the Czech Republic: diversity ecology, history and dynamics.84, 427-504.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Chytrý, M., KuČera, T. & KoČí M. (Eds.) (2001).Praha: AOPK ČR.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Craine, J.M. (2007). Plant strategy theories: replies to Grime and Tilman.95, 235-240. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2745.2007.01212.x.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Culek, M. (Ed.) (1996).Praha: Enigma.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Davi, H., Dufrêne, E., Granier, A., Le Dantec, V., Barbaroux, C, Francois, C. & Bréda N. (2005). Modelling carbon and water cycles in a beech forest. Part II: Validation of the main processes form organ to stand scale.185, 387-407. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.003.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Demek, J. (1987).Zeměpisný lexikon ČSR. Praha: Academia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Diaci, J. & Rozenbergar D. (2003). Interactions of light, soil properties and regeneration in the Slovenian Dinaric Alps: Patterns in virgin and managed forests. In F. Hamor & B. Commarmot (Eds.),(pp. 58-59). Mukachevo, Rakhiv, Birmensdorf: Carpathian Bio- sphere Reserve, Swiss Federal Research Institute.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Driessen, P., Deckers, J. & Nachtergaele F. (Eds.) (2001).Rome: FAO.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Ellenberg, H. (1996).Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer GmbH.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Finzi, A.C., Canham, CD. & van Breemen N. (1998). Canopy tree soil interactions within temperate forests: Species efects on pH and cations.8, 447-454. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0447:CTSIWT]2.0.CO;2
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Fitzsimmons, K.E., Markoviě, S.B. & Hambach U. (2012). Pleistocene environmental dynamics recorded in the loess of the middle and lower Danube basin.41, 104-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.quasci- rev.2012.03.002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Gaston, K.J. & Spicer J.I. (2004).Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Gégout, J.-C. & Križová E. (2003). Comparison of indicator values of forest understory plant species in Western Carpathians (Slovakia) and Vosges Mountains (France).182, 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/S0378- 1127(03)00068-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Godefroid, S., Massant, W. & Koedam N. (2005). Variation in the herb species response and the humus quality across a 200-year chronosequence of beech and oak plantations in Belgium.28, 223-235. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03877.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Gömöry, D., Hynek, V. & Paule V. (1998). Original article Delineation of seed zones for European beechL.) in the Czech Republic based on isozyme gene markers.55, 425-436. DOI: 10.1051/forest:19980403.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Green, R.N., Trowbridge, R.L. & Klinka K. (1993). Towards a taxonomic classification of humus forms.(Monograph 29), 39(Suppl. 1), a0001-z0002.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Grunda, B. (1993). Objemová hmotnost pědy v půdní mikrobiologii.41, 38-41.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. HoráČek, M., HoluŠa, O. & Samec P. (2011). Line of border of the Polonic and Westcarpathian biogeographical sub- provinces in the Czech Republic.3, 17-31.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Houba, V.G.J., van der Lee, J.J., Novozamsky I. & Walinga I. (1989).Soil and plant analysis, Part 5. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Kaplan, Z. (2012). Flora and phytogeography of the Czech Republic.84, 505-573.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Knollová, I. & Chytrý M. (2004). Oak-hornbeam forests of the Czech Republic: geographical and ecological ap- proaches to vegetation classification.76, 291-311.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. KuČera, A., RejŠek, K., Dundek, P., Marosz, K., Samec, P. & Sýkora J. (2011). Specification of the beechwood soil environment based on chosen soil properties, aiming at thehabitat.57, 185-191.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Lisá, L. & Uher P. (2006). Provenance of Würmian loess and loess-like sediments of Moravia and Silesia (Czech Republic): a study of zircon typology and cathodoluminiscence.57, 397-403.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Magri, D., Vendramin, G.G., Comps, B., Dupanloup, I., Geburek, T., Gömöry D., LataŁowa, M., Litt, T., Paule, L., Roure, J.M., Tantau, I., van der Knaap, W.O., Petit, R.J. & de Beaulieu J.-L. (2006). A new scenario for the Quarternary history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences.171, 199-221. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Ngao, J., Epron, D., Brechet, C. & Granier A. (2005). Estimating the contribution of leaf litter decomposi- tion to soil COefux in a beech forest usingC-depleted litter.11(10), 1768-1776. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.01014.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Patzel, N. & Ponge J.-F. (2001). The heterogeneity of humus components in a virgin beech forests37, 117-124. DOI: 10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01076-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Pott, R. (2000). Palaeoclimate and vegetation - long-term vegetation dynamics in central Europe with particular reference to beech.30, 285-333. DOI: 10.1127/phyto/30/2000/285.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Purdon, M., Cienciala, E., Metelka, V., Beranová, J., Hunová, I. & Černý M. (2004). Regional variation in forest health under long-term air pollution mitigated by lithological conditions.195, 355-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.039.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Qian, H. & Ricklefs R.E. (2004). Geographical distribution and ecological coservatism of disjunct genera of vascular plants in eastern Asia and eastern North America.92, 253-265. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00868.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Rand, W.M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods.66, 846-850. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1971.10482356.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Seynave, I., Gégout, J.-G., Hervé, J.-C, Dhôte, J.-F., 2008: Is the spatial distribution of European beechL.) limited by its potential height growth?35: 1851-1862. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2699.2008.01930.x.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Schmid, I. (2002). The influence of soil type and interspecific competition of the fine root system of Norway spruce and European beech.3, 339-346. DOI: 10.1078/1439-1791-00116.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Simon, J. (Ed.) (2003).(1. Část). Brno: Paido. Simon, J. (2004). Management strategies on territories with special status of protection in the Czech Republic.50, 510-513.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Simon, J. (Ed.) (2010).Obecná Část I. Kostelec nad Černými lesy: Lesnická práce.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Sugiero, D., Jaszczak, R., Rączka, G., Strzelinski, P., Węgiel, A. & Wierzbicka A. (2009). Species composition in low mountain beechstands in the Bieszczady National Park under the global warming.55, 244-250.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Svobodová, H., Reille, M. & Goeury C. (2001). Past vegetation dynamics of Vltavský luh, upper Vltava river valley in th Šumava mountains. Czech Republic.10, 185-199. DOI: 10.1007/PL00006930.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Tan, K.H. (2003).New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. USDA-NRSC (1996).Washington.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. van der Poel, P.W. (1976). Influence of environmental factors in the growth of the beech.3, 203-214. DOI: 10.1016/0341-8162(76)90010-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. VavŘíČek, D., Šimková, P., Samec, P. & Formánek P. (2006). Soil aspects of forest site revitalization afer windrow cultivation by heavy mechanization on the KruŠné hory Mts. Plateau.52, 1-12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Verdú, M., Dávila, P., García-Fayos, P., Flores-Hernandes, N. & Valiente-Banuet A. (2003). ’Convergent’ traits of Mediterranean woody plants belong to pre-mediterranean linkage.78, 415-427. DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00160.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Viewegh, J. (2002). South-Moravian foodplain forest herb vegetation in the period 1978-1997.48, 88-92.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. Voženílek, V. (2000).Olomouc: Katedra geografe UP Olomouc.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Walkley A. & Black I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjaref method for determinating soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method.37, 29-38.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. Wheeler, P.A. & Ward R.B. (1998).Austin: Acres U.S.A.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. White, R.E. (1987).Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publica- tions.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Zar, J. (1994).New Jersey: Prentice Hall Int.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Zinke, P.J. (1962). The pattern of influence of individual forest trees on soil properties.43, 130-133. DOI: 10.2307/1932049.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2014-0030 | Journal eISSN: 1337-947X | Journal ISSN: 1335-342X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 321 - 343
Published on: Dec 10, 2014
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
European beech,
biogeographical subprovince,
fulvic acids,
soil maximum capillary capacity
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Chemistry, other,
Geosciences,
Geography,
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2014 Pavel Samec, Aleš Kučera, Klement Rejšek, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 33 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
Previous article
Next article