Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Joint Slovak-Ukraine-Germany Beech Ecosystems as the World Natural Heritage Cover

Joint Slovak-Ukraine-Germany Beech Ecosystems as the World Natural Heritage

Ekológia (Bratislava)
Volume 33 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)
By:   
Open Access
|Aug 2014
References

References

  1. Akeroyd, J.R. (1993). Fagus L. In T.G. Tutin, V.H. Heywood, N.A. Burges, D.H. Valentine & D.M. Moore (Eds.),Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Assmann, T., Drees, C., Schroder, E. & Ssymank A. (2008). Low species diversity of beech forests - a myth. In H.D. Knapp (Ed.),Bonn: Bundesampt für Naturschutz (BfN), Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Skripten, 233, 25-31.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Balandina, A., Lovén, L., Ostermann, O. & Partington R. (2012). European Charter Parks - a growing network for sustainable tourism development in Protected Areas.18(2), 132-143.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Barbier, S., Gosselin, F. & Balandier P. (2008). Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved - A critical review for temperate and boreal forests.254(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j. foreco.2007.09.038.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Barna, M., Kulfan, J. & Bublinec E. (Eds.) (2011).Bratislava: VEDA, vydavateľstvo SAV.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, A.F. (1998).Gland, Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, G. (Ed.) (1994).London: Graham and Trotman.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Bishop, K., Dudfley, N., Phillips, A. & Stolton S. (2004).Cardiff University, IUCN - The World Conservation Union and UNEP - World Conservation Monitoring Centre.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Bohn, U. & Neuhäusl R. (2003).Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Hrsg. Bundesamt für Naturschutz.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Brang, P. (2005). Virgin forests as a knowledge source for central European silviculture: Reality or myth?79(1/2), 19-32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Brändli, U.B. & Dowhanytsch Y. (Eds.) (2003).Birmensdorf, Switzerland: Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt WSL; Rakhiv, Ukraine: Karpaten-Biosphärenreservat. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien, Haupt.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Britz, H., Dieckmann, O., Engels, B., Frede, A., Geisel, T., Grossmann, M., Kaiser, K., Knapp, H.D., Luthardt, M.E. & Seuring J. (2009).Nationale Naturlandschaften, Federal Republic of Germany. Niedenstein: Specialised editing Cognitio Kommunikation & Planung.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Bublinec, E. & Pichler V. (2001).Zvolen: Ústav ekológie lesa SAV
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Capotorti, G., Del Vico, E., Lattanzi, E., Persiani, A.M., Ravera Blasi, C., Marchetti, M., Chiavetta, U., Aleffi, M., Audi-sio, P., Azzella, M.M., Brunialti, G., S., Tilia, A. & Burrascano S. (2010). Multi-taxon and forest structure sampling for identification of indicators and monitoring of old-growth forest.144(1), 160-170. DOI: 10.1080/11263500903560538.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Ceballos-Lascuráin, H. (1996).Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge: IUCN
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Commarmot, B., Duelli, P. & Chumak V. (2000).Bir-mensdorf, Switzerland: Naturwerte in Ost und West. Publ. zur Tagung “Forum fuer Wissen”, WSL, p. 61-68.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Cooney, R. (2004).Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Čeŕovský, J. (Ed.) (1996).Praha: ECOPOINT Foundation.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Denisiuk, Z. & Stoyko S. (2000).In A. Breymayer & P. Dabrowski (Eds.), Biosphere Reserves on Borders (pp. 79-93). Warsaw: National UNESCO - MAB Committee of Poland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Dierschke, H. & Bohn U. (2004). Eutraphente Rotbuchenwälder in Europa.24: 19-58.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Dörfelt, H. (2008). Fungi of beech forests. In H.D. Knapp (Ed.),Bonn: Bundesampt für Naturschutz (BfN), Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. Skripten, 233, 33-36.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Drössler, L. & Lupke B. (2005). Canopy gaps in two virgin beech forest reserves in Slovakia.51, 446-457.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Drössler, L. (2006). Stand structure and gaps of virgin beech forests in Slovakia. In(pp. 18-20). Proceedings of IUFRO Conference, Poliana Brasov, 4. - 8. 9. 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Dudley, N. & Phillips A. (2006).Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Eagles, P.F.J., McCool, S.F. & Haynes Ch.D. (2002).Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. EUROPARK Federation (1993).Revised and Republished 2001. Grafenau: EUROPARK Federation.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. EUROPARK, IUCN (2000).Grafenau: EUROPARK and WCPA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Falkengren-Grerup, U. & Tyler G. (1991). Dynamic floristic changes of Swedish beech forest in relation to soil acidity and stand management.95,149-158. DOI: 10.1007/BF00045213.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Gebhard, K., Meyer, M. & Roth S. (2007).Ecological Tourism in Europe, Bonn, Germany and UNESCO MAB.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Giurgiu, V., Donita, N., Bândiu, C., Radu, S., Cenusa, R., Dissescu, R., Stoiculescu, C. & Iovu A. (2001).Asbl. Forêt Wallonne.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Gömöry, D., Kukla, J. & Schieber B. (2011). Taxonomy, phylogeny and distribution of beech in Europe and in Slovakia (in Slovak). In M. Barna, J. Kulfan & E. Bublinec (Eds.),(pp. 19-36). Bratislava: VEDA, vydavateľstvo SAV.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Hamilton, L.S., Mackay, J.C., Worboys, G.L., Jones, R.A. & Manson G.B. (1996).Canberra: Australian Alps Liaison Committee, IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Hamilton, L. & McMillan L. (2004).Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Hamor, F. & Commarmot B. (Eds.) (2003).International Conference in Mukachevo, Transcarpathia, Ukraine, October 13 - 17, 2003. Rakhiv, Ukraine: Carpathian Biosphere Reserve, Birmensdorf, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Hockings, M., Stolton, S. & Dudley N. (2000).Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Leverington, F., Dudley, N. & Courrau J. (2006).Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1991).Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. IUCN (1994).CNPPA with the assistance of WCMC. Glang, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. IUCN WCPA, 2000:Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Jaworski, A., Skrzyszewski, J. & Pach M. (1994a). Characteristic ofL. andL. virgin type forests in Bieszczady National Park. In I. Vološčuk (Ed.),(pp. 40-49). Ustrzyki Gorne, Poland: Bieszczady National Park, Association of the Carpathian National Parks and Protected Areas.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Jaworski, A., Kaczmarski, J., Skrzysewski, J. & Swiatkowski W. (1994b). Structure and dynamics of lower subalpine timber stands of Carpathian Mts of primeval character. In I. Vološčuk (Ed.),(pp. 23-39). Ustrzyki Gorne, Poland: Bieszczady National Park, Association of the Carpathian National Parks and Protected Areas.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Knapp, H.D. (2011). European beech forests and their biogeographical position. In H.D. Knapp & A. Fichtner (Eds.),Bonn: Bundesampt für naturschutz (BfN), Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. Skripten, 297, 9-14.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Koop, H. & Hilgen, P. (1987). Forest dynamics and regeneration mosaic shift in unexploited beechstands at Fontainebleau (France).20, 135-150. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(87)90155-1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Korpeľ, Š. (1982). Degree of equilibrium and dynamical changes of the forest on example of natural forests of Slovakia.24, 9-30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Korpeľ, Š. (1989).Bratislava: VEDA, vydavateľstvo SAV.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Korpeľ, Š. (1995).Stuttgart: Fischer Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Kozak, J., Estreguil, C. & Vogt P. (2007). Forest cover changes in the northern Carpathians in the 20th century: A slow transition.126, 77-90. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-006-0160-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Kricsfalusy, V., Ivaneha, I., Lugovoj, A., Budnikov, G., Mezö-Kricsfalusy, G., Mateleshko, A., Popov, S., Syvokhop, J., Pavlej, J. & Lesjo I. (2001).Uzhgorod: Karpaty.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Kuemmerle, T., Hostert, P., Radeloff, V.C., van den Linden, S., Perzanowski, K. & Kruhlov I. (2008). Cross-border comparison of post-Socialist farmland abondonement in the Carpathians.11, 614-628. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-008-9146-z.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Le Goff, J. (Ed.) (1990).London: The Chicago University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Leibundgut, H. (1978). Über die Dynamik europäicher Urwälder.24, 686-690.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Leibundgut, H. (1982).Bern/Stuttgart: Haupt.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Leibundgut, H. (1993).Bern und Stuttgart: Verlag Haupt.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Levrel, H. (2007).Paris: Institut Francais de la Biodiversité.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Lockwood, M., Worboys, G.L. & Kothari A. (2006).London, UK: IUCN and Earthscan.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Magri, D., Vendramin, G.G., Comps, B., Dupanloup, I., Geburek, T., Gömöry, D., Latalowa, M., Litt, T., Paule, L., Roure, J.M., Tantau, I., Van der Knaap, W.O., Petit, R.J. & de Beaulieu J.L. (2006). A new scenario for the Quaternary history of European beech populations: paleobotanical evidence and genetic consequences.171, 199-222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. Manos, P.S. & Stanford A.M. (2001). The historical biogeography of Fagaceae: tracking the Tertiary history of temperate and subtropical forests of the northern hemisphere.162, 77-93. DOI: 10.1086/323280.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Meyer, P. (1999). Determination of development phases and diversity of forest texture.170, 203-211.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Mölder, A., Bernhardt-Römermann, M. & Schmidt W. (2008). Herb-layer diversity in deciduous forests: Raised by tree richness or beaten by beech?256, 272-281. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.012.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  60. Oheimb, G., Westphal, C., Tempel, H. & Hardtle W. (2005). Structural pattern of a near-natural beech forest(Serrahn, North-east Germany).212, 253-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.033.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  61. Otto, H. (1994).Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer. Peterson, G., Allen, C.R. & Holling C.S. (1998). Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale.1, 6-18. DOI: 10.1007/s100219900002.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  62. Phillips, A. (Ed.) (2000).Guidelines for protected area managers. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  63. Phillips, A. (2002).Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  64. Pichler, V. & Soroková M. (2005). Utilisation of natural forests for ecotourism: Matching the goals and reality.79(1/2), 185-194.
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Pichler, V., Hamor, F., Vološčuk, I. & Sukharyuk D. (2007a). Outstanding universal value of the ecological processes in the primeval beech forests of the Carpathians and their management as World Heritage Sites. Bratislava: VEDA, vydavateľstvo SAV.
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Pichler, V., Vološčuk, I. & Bublinec E. (2007b). Designation of corridors connecting primeval forests properties within the East Carpathian Biosphere Reserve (Slovak Part). In Z. Guziová (Ed.),(pp.121-126). Proceedings from the International Conference, Stará Lesná, Tatry Biosphere Reserve, Slovakia, 2-6 June. Bratislava: Slovak National Committee for UNESCO MAB Programme.
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Plachter, H., Hoffmann, A., Panek, N. & Schmidt P.A. (2008). European Beech forests as a Natural site on the World Heritage List of UNESCO. In H.D. Knapp (Ed.),Bonn: Bundesampt für Naturschutz (BfN), Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. Skripten, 233, 53-60.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Sandwith, T., Shine, C., Hamilton, L. & Sheppard D. (2001).Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. Saniga, M. (2002). Structure, production conditions and regeneration processes of the beech virgin forest Rožok (in Slovak).21, 207-218.
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. Saniga, M. (2003). Structure, production conditions and regeneration processes of the beech virgin forest Havešová (in Slovak).22, 179-190.
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. Saniga, M. (2011): Primeval beech forests. In M. Barna, J. Kulfan & E. Bublinec (Eds.),(pp. 209-226). Bratislava: VEDA, vydavateľstvo SAV.
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. Saniga, M. & Klimaš V. (2004). Structure, production conditions and regeneration processes of the beech virgin forest Stužica in 4. forest vegetation stage (in Slovak).46, 93-104.
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. Saniga, M. & Schütz J.Ph. (2001). Dynamik das Totholzes in zwei gemischten Urväldern der Westkarpaten in pflanz-engeographischen Bereich der Tannen-Buchen und der Buchenwälder in verschidenen Entwicklugsstadien.152, 407-416.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  74. Saniga, M. & Schütz J.Ph. (2002). Relation of dead wood course within the development cycle of selected virgin forests in Slovakia.48, 513-528.
    Search in Google Scholar
  75. Saniga, M. & Sklenár P. (2003). Structure, production and regeneration processes of the beech virgin forest in National Nature Reserve Oblík (in Slovak).45, 169-178.
    Search in Google Scholar
  76. Stolton, S. & Dudley N. (Eds.) (1999).London: Earthscan.
    Search in Google Scholar
  77. Stolton, S., Hockings, M., Dudley, N., Mackinnom, K. & Written T. (2003).Gland, Switzerland: World Bank Washington, USA/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use.
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. Stolton, S., Dudley, N. & Shadie P. (2012).Gland, Switzerland: UNESCO, ICCROM, ICOMOS, IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  79. Stoyko, S., Sayik, D.S., Tatarinov, K.A., Tretyak, P.R., Tasenkevitsch, L.O., Malinovskij, K.A., Schewtschenko, S.V., Sukhariuk, D.D., Milkina, L.I., Komendar, V.I., Miller, M.P. & Manyiko M.P. (1982).Uzhgorod: Karpaty.
    Search in Google Scholar
  80. Stoyko, S. & Tasenkevitch L. (1993). Some aspects of endemism in the Ukrainian Carpathians.2(1), 343-353.
    Search in Google Scholar
  81. Stoyko, S. (2002).(in Ukraine). L’viv: Naukovi Praci Lisivničoji Akademii Nauk Ukrainy.
    Search in Google Scholar
  82. Synge, H. (2004).Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management: IUCN..
    Search in Google Scholar
  83. Thomas, L. & Middleton J. (2003).Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  84. Turnock, D. (2002). Ecoregion-based conservation in the Carpathians and the land use implications.19, 47-63. DOI: 10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00039-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  85. Udvardy, M. (1975). AIUCN Occasional Paper No.18. Morges: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  86. Vološčuk, I. (1992). Biological diversity in the Carpathians.2, 43-47.
    Search in Google Scholar
  87. Vološčuk, I. (1994). Conservation and Rational Use of Forest ecosystems in Carpathian Mountains. In I. Vološčuk (Ed.),(pp. 5-10). Ustrzyki Gorne: Bieszczady National Park, Association of the Carpathian National Parks and Protected Areas.
    Search in Google Scholar
  88. Vološčuk, I. (1995). Long-term Ecological Research and Monitoring on Carpathian National Parks and Biosphere Reserves. In F. Hamor & I. Vološčuk (Eds.),(pp. 10-22). Rakhiv: Carpathian Biosphere Reserve, Association of the Carpathian National Parks and Protected Areas.
    Search in Google Scholar
  89. Vološčuk, I. (Ed.) (1999).The Last Nature Paradises. Tatran-ská Lomnica: ACANAP.
    Search in Google Scholar
  90. Vološčuk, I. (2003).The Monographical Studies on National Parks 3. Tatranská Štrba: State Nature Conservancy, Tatry National Park Administration.
    Search in Google Scholar
  91. Wilshusen, P.R., Brechin, S.R., Fortwangler, C.L. & West P.C. (2002). Reinvesting a Square Wheel: Critique of Resurgent „Protection Paradigm “in International Biodiversity Conservation.15, 17-40. DOI: 10.1080/089419202317174002.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  92. Zbicz, D.C. & Green M.J.B. (1997). Status of the world’s transfrontier protected areas.7(3), 5-10.
    Search in Google Scholar
  93. Zlatník, A. & Hilitzer A. (1932). The Review of Nature Reserves and their proposals in Transcarpathian Ruthenia (in Czech).6(2), 33-84.
    Search in Google Scholar
  94. Zlatník, A. (1934). The Study of the State Forests in Transcarpathian Ruthenia. First Volume. The Contribution to the history of state forests and forestry in Transcarpathian Ruthenia (in Czech).sv. 126. Praha: Ministerstvo zemčdčlství republiky Československé,
    Search in Google Scholar
  95. Zlatník, A. (1935). The Study of the State Forests in Transcarpathian Ruthenia. Second Volume and Third Volume (in Czech).sv. 127. Praha: Ministerstvo zemédélství republiky Československé.
    Search in Google Scholar
  96. Zlatník, A. (1936). Luzhanskyi Virgin Forest in Subcarpathian Ruthenia, the largest Czechoslovakian Firgin Forest (in Czech).28, 110-118.
    Search in Google Scholar
  97. Zlatník, A., Korsuň, F., Kočetov, F. & Kseneman M. (1938). The Investigation of Natural Forests in Transcarpathian Ruthenia. First Volume (in Czech).sv. 152. Brno: Ministerstvo zemédélství republiky Československé.
    Search in Google Scholar
  98. Zukrigl, K., Eckhardt, G. & Nather J. (1963). Standortskundliche und waldbauliche Untersuchungen in Urwaldresten der niederösterreichischen Kalkalpen.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2014-0027 | Journal eISSN: 1337-947X | Journal ISSN: 1335-342X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 286 - 300
Published on: Aug 21, 2014
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
primeval beech forest,
ancient beech forest,
World Natural Heritage,
integrated management plan
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Chemistry, other,
Geosciences,
Geography,
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2014 Ivan Vološčuk, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 33 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)
Previous article