Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Proportion of Root Production in Several Temperate Grasslands of Central Europe Cover

Proportion of Root Production in Several Temperate Grasslands of Central Europe

Ekológia (Bratislava)
Volume 33 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Aug 2014
References

References

  1. Andrzejewska, L. (1991). Root production of some grass communities on peat soil in river valleys of Biebrza and Narew.17, 63-72.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bakker, M.R., Augusto, L. & Achat D.L. (2006). Fine root distribution of trees and understory in mature stands of marine pineon dry and humid sites.286, 37-51. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-006-9024-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Fay, P.A., Kaufman, D.M., Nippert, J.B., Carlisle, J.D. & Harper C.W. (2008). Changes in grassland ecosystem function due to extreme rainfall events: implications for responses to climate change.14, 1600-1608. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01605.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Fiala, K. (1993). Underground biomass in meadow stands. In M. Rychnovská (Ed.),(pp. 133-153). Praha: Academia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Fiala, K. (1997). Underground plant biomass of grassland communities in relation to mowing intensity.31, 1-54.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Fiala, K. (1998). Variation in belowground biomass of grass stands in deforested areas affected by air pollution in the Beskydy Mts.17(Suppl. 1), 256-278.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Fiala, K. (2000). Root and rhizome growth of grassesandon deforested sites in response to pollution and climatic impacts.55, 91-98.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Fiala, K. (2001). The role of root system ofin its successful expansion in alluvial meadows.20, 292-300.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Fiala, K., Záhora, J., Tûma, I. & Holub P. (2004). Importance of plant matter accumulation, nitrogen uptake and utilization in expansion of tall grassesandinto acidophilous dry grassland.23, 225-240.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Fiala, K., Tûma, I. & Holub P. (2009). Effect of manipulated rainfall on root production and plant belowground dry mass of different grassland ecosystems.12, 906-914. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-009-9264-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Fiala, K. (2010). Belowground plant biomass of grassland ecosystems and its variation according to ecological factors.29, 182-206. DOI: 10.4149/ekol_2010_02_182.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Fiala, K., Tûma, I. & Holub P. (2012). Interannual variation in root production in grasslands affected by artificially modified amount ofrainfall.Article ID 805298, 10 pages. DOI: 10.1100/2012/805298.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Fitter, A.H., Graves, J.D., Self, G.K. & Brown T.K. (1998). Root production, turnover and respiration under two grassland types along an altitudinal gradient: influence of temperature and solar radiation.114, 2030. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050415.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Gill, R.A. & Jackson R.B. (2000). Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems.147, 13-31. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00681.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Gill, R.A., Kelly, R.H., Parton, W.J., Day, K.A., Jackson, R.B., Morgan, J.A., Scurlock, J.M.O., Tieszen, L.L., Castle, J.V., Okima, D.S. & Zhang X.S. (2002): Using simple environmental variables to estimate belowground productivity in grasslands.11, 79-86. DOI: 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00267.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Hayes, D.C. & Seastedt T.R. (1987). Root dynamics of tallgrass prairie in wet and dry years.65, 787-791. DOI: 10.1139/b87-105.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Holub, P. (2002). The expansion ofinto alluvial meadows: comparison of aboveground biomass in relation to water regimes.21, 27-37.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Holub, P., Fabšičová, M., Tûma, I., Záhora, J. & Fiala K. (2013a). Effects of artificially varying amounts of rainfall on two semi-natural grassland types.24(3), 518-529. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01487.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Holub, P., Tûma, I. & Fiala K. (2013b). Effect of fertilization on root growth of submontane Polygono-Cirsietum meadow.59, 342-347.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Hrabe, F., Straka, J. & Rosická L. (2002). Produkční a strukturální zmeny polopŕirozeného a nove setého lučního společenstva v oblasti CHKO Žďárské vrchy. In V. Krajčovič. (Ed.),(pp. 220-227). Banská Bystrica: Výskumný ústav trávnych porastov a horského poľnohospodárstva.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Hui, D. & Jackson R.B. (2006). Geographical and interannual variability in biomass partitioning in grassland ecosystems: a synthesis of field data.169, 85-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01569.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Ibrahim, L., Proe, M.F. & Cameron A.D. (1997). Main effects of nitrogen supply and drought stress upon whole-plant carbon allocation in poplar.27, 1413-1419. DOI: 10.1139/x97-080.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Jakrlová, J. (1971). Flooded meadow communities. An analysis of productivity in a dry year.6, 1-27.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Jakrlová, J. (1996). Variability of aboveground production ofin localities exposed to emissions in the region of the Beskydy Mts. In K. Fiala (Ed.),(pp. 75-82). Brno: ASCR, Institute of Landscape Ecology.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Köchy, M. & Wilson S.D. (2004). Semiarid grassland responses to short-term variation in water availability.174, 197-203. DOI: 10.1023/B:VEGE.0000049098.74147.57.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Koppisch, D. (1994). Nährstoffhaushalt un Populationsdynamik von(Chais.) J.F. Gmel, einer Rhizompflanze des Unterwuchses von Fichtenwäldern.12, 1-187.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Melillo, J.M., McGuire, A.D., Kicklighter, A.W., Moore, B.I., Vorosmary, C.J. & Schloss A.L. (1993). Global climate-change and terrestrial net primary production.363, 234-240. DOI: 10.1038/363234a0.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Milchunas, D.G. (2012). Biases and errors associated with different root production methods and their effects on field estimates of belowground net primary production. In S. Mancuso (Ed.),(pp. 303-339). Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22067-8_16.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Ni, J. (2004). Estimating net primary productivity of grasslands from field biomass measurements in temperate northern China.174, 217-234. DOI: 10.1023/B:VEGE.0000049097.85960.10.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Pilát, A. (1969). Underground dry weight in the grassland communities ofR. Tx. 1937 andVicherek 1960.4, 225-234.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Pyšek, P. (1993). What do we know aboutA review of the species behaviour in secondary habitats.63, 9-20.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Qaderi, M.M., Kurepin, L.V. & Reid D.M. (2006). Growth and physiological responses of canolato three components of global climate changes: Temperature, carbon dioxide and drought.128, 710-721. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00804.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Risch, A.C., Jurgensen, M.F. & Frank D.A. (2007). Effects of grazing and soil micro-climate on decomposition rates in a spatio-temporally heterogeneous grassland.298, 191-201. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-007-9354-x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Rychnovská, M. (1983). Grasslands: A multifunctional link between natural and man-made ecosystems.2, 337-345.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Stanton, N.L. (1988). The underground in grasslands.19, 573-589. DOI: 10.1146/annurev. es.19.110188.003041.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Titlyanova, A.A., Romanova, I.P., Kosykh, N.P. & Mironycheva-Tokareva N.P. (1999). Pattern and process in above-ground and below-ground components of grassland ecosystems.10, 307-320. DOI: 10.2307/3237060.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Tomaškin, J. & Tomaškinová J. (2012). The ecological and environmental functions of grass ecosystems and their importance in the elimination of degradation processes in agricultural landscape.7, 71-78.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Xu, X., Niu, Sh., Sherry, R.A., Zhou, X. & Zhou J. (2012). Interannual variability in responses of belowground net primary productivity (NPP) and NPP partitioning to long-term warming and clipping in a tallgrass prairie.18, 1648-1656. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02651.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Yahdjian, L. & Sala O.E. (2006). Vegetation structure constrains primary production response to water availability in the Patagonian steppe.87, 952-962. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[952:VSCPPR]2.0.CO.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2014-0022 | Journal eISSN: 1337-947X | Journal ISSN: 1335-342X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 232 - 241
Published on: Aug 21, 2014
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
altitude,
biomass partitioning,
grassland,
net primary productivity,
precipitation,
temperature
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Chemistry, other,
Geosciences,
Geography,
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2014 Karel Fiala, Ivan Tůma, Petr Holub, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 33 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)
Previous article
Next article