Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fractal analysis of leaves: are all leaves self-similar along the cane? Cover

Fractal analysis of leaves: are all leaves self-similar along the cane?

By:   
Open Access
|Aug 2013

References

  1. Borkowski, W. (1999). Fractal dimension based features are useful descriptors of leaf complexity and shape.., 29, 1301−1310. DOI:10.1139/cjfr-29-9-1301.
  2. Bradbury, R.H., Reichelt, R.E. & Green D.G. (1984). Fractals in ecology: methods and interpretation., 14, 295−296. DOI:10.3354/meps014295.
  3. Bruno, O.M., Plotze, R.D., Falvo, M. & de Castro M. (2008). Fractal dimension applied to plant identification., 178, 2722−2733. DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2008.01.023.
  4. Dicke, M. & Burrough P.A. (1988). Using fractal dimensions for characterizing tortuosity of animal trails., 13, 393−398. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1988.tb01122.x.
  5. Fitter, A.H. & Stickland T.S. (1992). Fractal characterization of root system architecture.., 6, 632−635. DOI:10.2307/2389956.
  6. Gastner, M.T., Oborny B., Zimmermann, D.K. & Pruessner G. (2009). Transition from connected to fragmented vegetation across an environmental gradient: scaling laws in ecotone geometry.., 174, E23−E39. DOI:10.1086/599292.
  7. Gazda, A. (1996). The geometry of fractal and its applications in ecology., 62, 163−178.
  8. Hastings, H.M. & Sugihara G. (1993).. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  9. Jonckheere, I., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B., van Aardt, J. & Coppin P. (2006). A fractal dimension-based modelling approach for studying the effect of leaf distribution on LAI retrieval in forest canopies., 197, 179−195. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.036.
  10. Kalliokoski, T., Sievanen, R. & Nygren P. (2010). Tree roots as self-similar branching structures: axis differentiation and segment tapering in coarse roots of three boreal forest tree species., 24, 219-236. DOI:10.1007/ s00468-009-0393-1.
  11. Kincaid, D.T. & Schneider R.B. (1983). Quantification of leaf shape with a microcomputer and Fourier transform.., 61, 2333−2342. DOI:10.1139/b83-256.
  12. Mandelbrot, B.B. (1983).. New York: WH Freeman & Co.
  13. Morse, D.R., Lawton, J.H., Dodson, M.M. & Williamson M.H. (1985). Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths., 314, 731−733. DOI:10.1038/314731a0.
  14. Palmer, M.W. (1988). Fractal geometry: a tool for describing spatial pattern of plant communities., 75, 91−102. DOI:10.1007/BF00044631.
  15. Peitgen, H.-O. & Soupe D. (1988).. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer- Verlag.
  16. Prusinkiewicz, P., Lindenmayer, A. & Hanan J. (1988). Developmental models of herbaceous plants for computer imagery purposes., 22, 141−150. DOI:10.1145/378456.378503.
  17. Siso, S., Camarero, J.J. & Gil-Pelegrin E. (2001). Relationship between hydraulic resistance and leaf morphology in broadleaf Quercus species: a new interpretation of leaf lobation., 15, 341-345. DOI:10.1007/ s004680100110.
  18. Sugihara, G. & May M.M. (1990). Applications of fractals in ecology.., 5, 79−86. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90235-6.
  19. Tokarski, R. (1992).. Manuscript.
  20. Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters S.M. & Webb D.A. (1968).. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Vlcek, J. & Cheung E. (1986). Fractal analysis of leaf shapes.., 16, 124−127. DOI:10.1139x86-020.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2013-0009 | Journal eISSN: 1337-947X | Journal ISSN: 1335-342X
Language: English
Page range: 104 - 110
Published on: Aug 24, 2013
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2013 Anna Gazda, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.