Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The impact of service quality on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty: An analysis of the KFC fast food chain company in Inner Mongolia in China Cover

The impact of service quality on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty: An analysis of the KFC fast food chain company in Inner Mongolia in China

By:  and    
Open Access
|Aug 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1:

Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for all constructs

ConstructCronbach’s alpha (α)Number of items
Service quality0.97412
Customer satisfaction0.96212
Customer loyalty0.96611
Overall0.95535
Table 2:

Demographics of the study (n = 353)

VariableCategoryFrequency (F)Percentage (%)
GenderMale17750.1
Female17649.9
Age18 – 2414440.8
25 – 3410830.6
35 – 445214.7
45 – 54298.2
55 and above205.7
NationalityMongolia26073.7
China6919.5
Korea92.5
Japan72.0
Others82.3
EducationBelow High school4613.0
High school or equivalent4312.2
Vocational degree4412.5
College8925.2
Bachelor’s degree9025.5
Postgraduate4111.6
ProfessionEmployed14942.2
Vocational job339.3
Unemployed6418.1
Retired144.0
Student7220.4
Homemaker215.9
Yearly IncomeUnder RMB 20,0009526.9
RMB 20,001 – RMB 30,0004713.3
RMB 30.001 – RMB 40,0004913.9
RMB 40,001 – RMB 50,000359.9
RMB 50,000 – RMB 70.000339.3
RMB 70,000 – RMB 90,000215.9
RMB 90,000 – RMB 110,0004512.7
RMB 110,000 or above287.9
Frequency of visitsDaily3710.5
Weekly4813.6
Monthly6117.3
Every 3 months6418.1
Every 6 months6017.0
Once a year4913.9
Never349.6
Table 3:

Correlation of the study

Scales123
Service quality1
Customer satisfaction0.786**1
Customer loyalty0.680**0.753**1

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Table 4:

Regression analysis

Dependent variable: customer loyalty
Independent variablesβt-valuep-valueToleranceVIFHypothesis
Service quality0.99314.5160.0000.4522.212H1 – Significant
Customer satisfaction0.5007.7900.0000.4522.212H2 – Significant

[i] Notes: Durbin-Watson =1.415, R2 = 0.482, F = 64.629, p ≤ 0.001

Table 5:

Regression analysis

Dependent variable: customer satisfaction
Independent variableβt-valuep-valueHypothesis
Service Quality0.816923.7990.000H3 - Significant

[i] Notes: R2 = 0.6174, F = 566.419, p≤0.001

Table 6:

Regression Analysis

Dependent variable: customer loyalty
Independent variablesβt-valuep-value
Customer Satisfaction0.62410.3230.000
Service Quality0.2604.1410.000

[i] Notes: R2 = 0.587, F = 249.494, p ≤ 0.001

Table 7:

Regression analysis

Dependent variable: customer loyalty
Independent variableβt-valuep-value
Service Quality0.770017.3690.000

[i] Notes: R2 = 0.4622, F = 301.6823, p ≤ 0.001

Table 8:

Total, direct and indirect effects

Total effect of SQ on CL
EffectSEtpLLCIULCI
0.77000.044317.36900.00000.68280.8572
Direct effect of SQ on CL
EffectSEtpLLCIULCI
0.26030.06284.14150.00000.13670.3839
Indirect effect of SQ on CL
EffectBoot SEBootLLCIBootULCI
CSall0.50970.06260.38780.6329
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2026-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2182-4924 | Journal ISSN: 2182-4916
Language: English
Page range: 193 - 206
Submitted on: Jan 20, 2025
Accepted on: Dec 4, 2025
Published on: Aug 31, 2026
Published by: Polytechnic Institute of Leiria
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Li Xiang, Anshul Garg, published by Polytechnic Institute of Leiria
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.