Personality traits and environmental identity in participating in trekking: The flow theory

Şenel, Elif; Sarı, Yaşar

doi:10.2478/ejthr-2025-0011

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the effect of five-factor personality traits and environmental identity on the flow experience of levels of individuals participating in trekking activities, a form of special-interest tourism. The research model was built on flow theory. The relationship among the related variables was tested using Smart PLS. The research universe consists of individuals (n=384) who participated in trekking activities with outdoor sports clubs in Eskişehir Province. The study found that while five-factor personality traits—extraversion, agreeableness, openness, and neuroticism—positively affect environmental identity, the personality trait of conscientiousness has no significant effect on environmental identity. Individuals with the personality traits of openness and neuroticism were also found to have experienced flow, while extraversion, conscientiousness, and agreeableness did not have any significant effect on the flow experience. Finally, environmental identity positively influenced the flow experience. Based on the research findings, original recommendations have been developed for enterprises organising trekking activities within the tourism sector.

References

Ajibade, I., & Boateng, G. (2021). Predicting why people engage in pro-sustainable behavior in Portland, Oregon: The role of environmental self-identity, personal norm, and socio-demographics. Journal of Environmental Management, 289(2021), 112538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112538
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Akçakese, A., Demirel, M., Yolcu, A. F., Gümüş, H., Ayhan, C., Sarol, H., Işık, Ö, Demirel, D. H., & Stoica, L. (2024). Nature relatedness, flow experience, and environmental behaviors in nature-based leisure activities. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(2024), 1–12. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1397148/full
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arthur, W., & Graziano, W. G. (1996). The five-factor model, conscientiousness, and driving accident involvement. Journal of Personality, 64(3), 593–618. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00523.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Asakawa, K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college 5(2), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOHS.0000035915.97836.89
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blanchard, C., & Paquet, M. (2023). Exploring environmental identity at work and at home: A multifaceted perspective. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 5(2023), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100141
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blatt, E. N. (2013). Exploring environmental identity and behavioral change in an environmental science course. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(2), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9459-2-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bonaiuto, M., Mao, Y., Roberts, S., Psalti, A., Ariccio, S., Ganucci Cancellieri, U., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2016). Optimal experience and personal growth: Flow and the consolidation of place edentity. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(2016), 1654. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01654
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bravo, G., & Farjam, M. (2022). Actions speak louder than words: Attitudes, behaviour, and partisan identity in a polarized environmental domain. Energy Research & Social Science, 90(2022), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102547
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burger, J. M. (2006). Kişilik [Personality]. Kaknüs Yayınları.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Caprara, G. V., & Cervone, D. (2000). Personality: Determinants, dynamics, and potentials. Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carfora, V., Caso, D., Sparks, P., & Conner, M. (2017). Moderating effects of pro-environmental self-identity on pro-environmental intentions and behavior: A multi-behavior study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53(2017), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.07.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen, W.–T., & Hsieh, M.-H. (2023). Environmental self-identity, self-efficacy, and the emergence of green opinion leaders: An exploratory study. Heliyon, 9(2023), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17351
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cheng, T.-M., Hsu, C.-Y., & Li, S.-N. (2024). Testing the moderated mediation effect of recreation safety climate on the interrelationship of serious leisure, recreation involvement, and flow experience. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 46(2024), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2024.100762
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment (pp. 45–65). MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003). Identity and the natural environment. MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.utstat.toronto.edu/brunner/oldclass/378f16/readings/CohenPower.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2020). Akış: Mutluluk bilimi [Flow: The science of happiness]. Hyb Yayıncılık.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (1992). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (1989). The dynamics of intrinsic motivation: A study of adolescents. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions (pp. 45–71). Academic Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ding, H.-M., & Hung, K.-P. (2021). The antecedents of visitors’ flow experience and its influence on memory and behavioral intentions in the music festival context. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 19(2021), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100551
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Edwards, G. I. (2018). Multidisciplinary approach to environmental problems and sustainability. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Encyclopedia of sustainability in higher education (pp. 1–6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_241-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Egan, S., & Stelmack, R. M. (2003). A personality profile of Mount Everest climbers. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(8), 1491–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00130-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Erikson, E. H. (1984). İnsanın Sekiz Çağı [Eight ages of man]. Birey ve Toplum.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications. https://eli.johogo.com/Class/CCU/SEM/_A%20Primer%20on%20Partial%20Least%20Squares%20Structural%20Equation%20Modeling_Hair.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. hhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jackson, S. A., Eklund, R. C., Gordon, A., Norsworthy, C., Mackenzie, S. H., Hodge, K., & Stephen, S. A. (2023). Flow and outdoor adventure recreation: Using flow measures to re-examine motives for participation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 67(2023), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102427
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jiang, Z., & Tu, H. (2022). Does sincere social interaction stimulate tourist immersion? A conservation of resources perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 62(2), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211067549
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Keith, R. J., Given, L. M., Martin, J. M., & Hochul, D. F. (2022). Environmental self-identity partially mediates the effects of exposure and connection to nature on urban children’s conservation behaviors. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 3(2022), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100066
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kim, M. J., Bonn, M., Lee, C.–K., & Kim, J. S. (2019). Effects of employees’ personality and attachment on job flow experience relevant to organizational commitment and consumer-oriented behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 41(2019), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.09.010
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lappegard Hauge, A. (2007). Identity and place: A critical comparison of three identity theories. Architectural Science Review, 50(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2007.5007
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lou, X., & Li, L. M. W. (2021). The relationship between identity and environmental concern: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76(2021), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101653
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCrae, R. R. (2010). The Place of the FFM in Personality Psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 21(1), 57–64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25704848
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1995). Trait explanations in personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 9(4), 231–252. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/per.2410090402
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50032-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). Guilford Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The big five personality traits and environmental engagement: Associations at the individual and societal level. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & J. L. Snyder (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Parks-Leduc, L., Feldman, G., & Bardi, A. (2015). Personality traits and personal values: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314538548
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pomfret, G. (2006). Mountaineering adventure tourists: A conceptual framework for research. Tourism Management, 27(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.08.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Poškus, M. S. (2017). Normative influence of pro-environmental intentions in adolescents with different personality types. Current Psychology, 39(2017), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9759-5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rather, R. A., Hollebeek, L. D., & Rasoolimanesh, S. M. (2021). First-time versus repeat tourism customer engagement, experience, and value cocreation: An empirical investigation. Journal of Travel Research, 61(3), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287521997572
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2022). Smart PLS 4. Smart PLS.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Şenel, E. (2023). Effect of personality traits of individuals participating in trekking within the scope of special interest tourism on their environmental identity and flow (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Institute of Social Sciences.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stets, J. E., & Biga, C. F. (2003). Bringing identity theory into environmental sociology. Social Theory, 21(4), 398–423. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9558.2003.00196.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swann, C., Keegan, R. J., Piggott, D., & Crust, L. (2012). A systematic review of the experience, occurrence, and controllability of flow states in elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(6), 807–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.05.006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tian, Y., & Ou, L. (2023). How do personality traits of college students affect their learning flow experience?. Learning and Motivation, 83(2023), Article 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101917
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Williams, S. (2003). Tourism and recreation. Pearson Education
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wu, C. H.-J., & Liang, R.–D. (2011). The relationship between white-water rafting experience formation and customer reaction: A flow theory perspective. Tourism Management, 32(2), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.03.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xiang, K., Cao, Y., Qiao, G., & Li, W. (2023). Glamping: An exploration of emotional energy and flow experiences in interaction rituals. Tourism Management Perspectives, 48(2023), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101149
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xie, M., Mao, Y., & Yang, R. (2022). Flow experience and city identity in the restorative environment: A conceptual model and nature-based intervention. Frontiers in Public Health, 11(2022), 1074321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1011890
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.259
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
This article is based on the doctoral dissertation titled Effect of personality traits of individuals participating in trekking within the scope of special interest tourism on their environmental identity and flow, completed by Şenel, E. at Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Institute of Social Sciences, in 2023.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Personality traits and environmental identity in participating in trekking: The flow theory

Abstract

Paradigm

My account