The Relationships Between Environmental Regulation and Eco-Efficiency: Evidence from China

Chu, Xuyuan

doi:10.2478/eces-2024-0037

Abstract

This study explores the causal relationships between environmental regulation and eco-efficiency in China’s industrial and power sectors using a vector autoregressive (VAR) model and Granger causality tests. By analysing data from 2006 to 2020, we find that energy structure plays a pivotal role in determining eco-efficiency within the industrial sector, while imperative environmental regulations are a significant Granger cause of eco-efficiency in the power sector. Industrial agglomeration also exerts notable effects in both sectors. These findings underscore the sector-specific differences in the effectiveness of environmental regulations and highlight the need for tailored policy approaches to improve eco-efficiency across industries.

References

Xu XF, Cui YJ, Zhong Y. Impact of environmental regulation and FDI on green total factor productivity: Evidence from China. Environ Eng Manage J. 2021;20(2):177-84. DOI: 10.30638/EEMJ.2021.018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen B, Gegentana, Wang Y. The impact of environmental regulations on enterprise pollution emission from the perspective of “overseeing the government”. Sustainability. 2023;15(14):11311. DOI: 10.3390/su151411311.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhao YM, Zhu FM, He LL. Definition, classification and evolution of environmental regulation. Chinese Population, Resources Environ. 2009;(6):85-90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2009.06.016.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ren S, Li X, Yuan B, Li B, Chen X. The effects of three types of environmental regulation on eco-efficiency: A cross-region analysis in China. J Cleaner Prod. 2018;173:245-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.113.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shao S, Hu Z, Cao J, Yang L, Guan D. Environmental regulation and enterprise innovation: a review. Business Strategy Environ. 2020;29(3):1465-78. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2446.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang J, Kang L, Li H, Ballesteros-Pérez P, Skitmore M, Zuo J. The impact of environmental regulations on urban green innovation efficiency: the case of Xi’An. Sustain Cities Society. 2020;57:102123. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102123.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wu H, Hao Y, Ren S. How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency: Evidence from China. Energy Economics. 2020;91:104880. DOI: 10.1016/J.Eneco.2020.104880.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wu L, Wang C. Research on rural environmental pollution control path under administrative intervention mechanism. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2022;29(3):391-402. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2022-0028.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shangguan X, Wang X. Tax competition, environmental regulation and air pollution-empirical evidence from 278 cities in China. Environ Eng Manage J. 2021;20(4):635-44. DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2021.062.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wu SH, Wang HQ, He M, Qin C. Environmental regulation, environmental policy complexity and technological innovation efficiency. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2023;30(2):159-66. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2023-0015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Neves SA, Marques AC, Da Silva Patricio M. Determinants of CO₂ emissions in European union countries: does environmental regulation reduce environmental pollution? Economic Analysis Policy. 2020;68:114-25. DOI: 10.1016/J.Eap.2020.09.005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luo Y, Salman M, Lu Z. Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulations and foreign direct investment on green innovation across different regions in China. Sci Total Environ. 2021;759:143744. DOI: 10.1016/J.Scitotenv.2020.143744.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu L, Zou Y. Monitoring of marine ecological environmental data security and management system based on internet of things. Environ Eng Manage J. 2022;21(2):225-36. DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2022.022.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lei X, Wang H, Deng F, Li S, Chang W. Sustainability through scrutiny: Enhancing transparency in Chinese corporations via environmental audits. J Knowledge Economy. 2024;1-70. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-02106-5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cui S, Wang Y, Zhu Z, Zhu Z, Yu C. The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulation on the energy eco-efficiency of China’s energy-mineral cities. J Cleaner Prod. 2022;350:131553. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131553.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Konisky DM. Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: Is there a race to the bottom? Am J Political Sci. 2007;51(4):853-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00285.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yuan B, Ren S, Chen X. Can environmental regulation promote the coordinated development of economy and environment in China’s manufacturing industry? - A panel data analysis of 28 sub-sectors. J Cleaner Prod. 2017;149:11-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.065.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dongyan L. Fiscal and tax policy support for energy efficiency retrofit for existing residential buildings in China’s northern heating region. Energy Policy. 2009;37(6):2113-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.036.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Qin M, Sun M, Li J. Impact of environmental regulation policy on ecological efficiency in four major urban agglomerations in eastern China. Ecol Indicators. 2021;130:108002. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Korhonen J, Pätäri S, Toppinen A, Tuppura A. The role of environmental regulation in the future competitiveness of the pulp and paper industry: the case of the sulfur emissions directive in Northern Europe. J Cleaner Prod. 2015;108(Part_A):864-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.003.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cox B, Innis S, Kunz NC, Steen J. The mining industry as a net beneficiary of a global tax on carbon emissions. Commun Earth Environ. 2022;3(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1038/s43247-022-00346-4.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mahmood H, Adow AH, Abbas M, Iqbal A, Murshed M, Furqan M. The fiscal and monetary policies and environment in GCC countries: analysis of territory and consumption-based CO₂ emissions. Sustainability. 2022;14(3):1225. DOI: 10.3390/su14031225.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yasmeen H, Tan Q, Zameer H, Tan J, Nawaz K. Exploring the impact of technological innovation, environmental regulations and urbanization on ecological efficiency of China in the context of COP21. J Environ Manage. 2020;274:111210. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111210.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luo G, Wang X, Wang L, Guo Y. The relationship between environmental regulations and green economic efficiency: A study based on the provinces in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(3):889. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18030889.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li R, Sun T. Research on impact of different environmental regulation tools on energy efficiency in China. Polish J Environ Studies. 2020;29(6):4151-60. DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/120520.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tsung-Li W, Hung-Pin L, Yu-Chi S. The dynamic analysis among energy consumption, tourist expansion and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions. Economic Computation Economic Cybernetics Stud Res. 2022;56(4):157-72. DOI: 10.24818/18423264/56.4.22.10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fendoğlu E, Konat G. Asymmetric relationship between environmental protection expenditures and economic growth: Panel causality findings from selected OECD countries. Economic Computation Economic Cybernetics Stud Res. 2023;57(1):121-36. DOI: 10.24818/18423264/57.1.23.08.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meșter IT, Meșter LE, Fora AF. Exploring the relationship between economic growth, trade openness, CO2 emissions, and renewable energy: Evidence from eastern European countries. Economic Computation Economic Cybernetics Stud Res. 2023;57(2):221-34. DOI: 10.24818/18423264/57.2.23.14.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grigore GE, Mușetescu RC, Nicolae S, Vladut O, Ionescu AM. The interplay between natural gas consumption, oil consumption, and economic growth: An empirical evidence. Economic Computation Economic Cybernetics Stud Res. 2023;57(4):23-40. DOI: 10.24818/18423264/57.4.23.02.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu L, Jiang J, Bian J, Liu Y, Lin G, Yin Y. Are environmental regulations holding back industrial growth? Evidence from China. J Cleaner Prod. 2021;306:127007. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jclepro.2021.127007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang Z, Chen H. Dynamic interaction of renewable energy technological innovation, environmental regulation intensity and carbon pressure: Evidence from China. Renew Energy. 2022;192: 420-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.136.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang Y, Chen H, He Z. Environmental Regulation, R&D Investment, and green technology innovation in China: Based on the pvar model. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(10):0275498. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275498.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Omodero CO. Fiscal and monetary measures in achieving green ecology: Evidence from Nigeria. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia. 2023;23(2):311-30. DOI: 10.2478/foli-2023-0033.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang C, Yang X, Sun Y, Chen B, Wu X, Dong M. How to achieve carbon emission reduction in the power industry: Perspective from the power grid company. Environ Eng Manage J. 2023;22(12):1973-84. DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2023.170.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The Relationships Between Environmental Regulation and Eco-Efficiency: Evidence from China

Abstract

Paradigm

My account