Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Appropriateness of Numbers of Receptive Fields in Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Classifying CIFAR-10 and EEACL26 Datasets Cover

Appropriateness of Numbers of Receptive Fields in Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Classifying CIFAR-10 and EEACL26 Datasets

By:   
Open Access
|Mar 2019

References

  1. [1] H. H. Aghdam and E. J. Heravi, Guide to convolutional neural networks: a practical application to traffic-sign detection and classification. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57550-610.1007/978-3-319-57550-6
  2. [2] A. Gibson and J. Patterson, Deep Learning: A Practitioner’s Approach. O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2017.
  3. [3] K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition,” Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, arXiv:1409.1556v6 [cs.CV], 2015.
  4. [4] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 84–90, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/306538610.1145/3065386
  5. [5] P. Tang, H. Wang, and S. Kwong, “G-MS2F: GoogLeNet based multi-stage feature fusion of deep CNN for scene recognition,” Neurocomputing, vol. 225, pp. 188–197, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.11.02310.1016/j.neucom.2016.11.023
  6. [6] V. Campos, B. Jou, and X. Giró-i-Nieto, “From pixels to sentiment: Fine-tuning CNNs for visual sentiment prediction,” Image and Vision Computing, vol. 65, pp. 15–22, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2017.01.01110.1016/j.imavis.2017.01.011
  7. [7] Z. Bai, L. L. C. Kasun, and G.-B. Huang, “Generic object recognition with local receptive fields based extreme learning machine,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 53, pp. 39–399, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.31610.1016/j.procs.2015.07.316
  8. [8] V. V. Romanuke, “Appropriateness of Dropout layers and allocation of their 0.5 rates across convolutional neural networks for CIFAR-10, EEACL26, and NORB datasets,” Applied Computer Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 54–63, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/acss-2017-001810.1515/acss-2017-0018
  9. [9] M. Ranzato, C. Poultney, S. Chopra, and Y. L. Cun, “Efficient Learning of Sparse Representations with an Energy-Based Model,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 19, pp. 1137–1144, 2006.
  10. [10] V. V. Romanuke, “Training data expansion and boosting of convolutional neural networks for reducing the MNIST dataset error rate,” Research Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, no. 6, pp. 29–34, 2016. https://doi.org/10.20535/1810-0546.2016.6.8411510.20535/1810-0546.2016.6.84115
  11. [11] E. Kussul and T. Baidyk, “Improved method of handwritten digit recognition tested on MNIST database,” Image and Vision Computing, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 971–981, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2004.03.00810.1016/j.imavis.2004.03.008
  12. [12] P. Date, J. A. Hendler, and C. D. Carothers, “Design index for deep neural networks,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 88, pp. 131–138, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.41610.1016/j.procs.2016.07.416
  13. [13] D. Ciresan, U. Meier, J. Masci, L. M. Gambardella, and J. Schmidhuber, “Flexible, high performance convolutional neural networks for image classification,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 1237–1242, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-21010.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-210
  14. [14] V. V. Romanuke, “Two-layer perceptron for classifying flat scaled-turned-shifted objects by additional feature distortions in training,” Journal of Uncertain Systems, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 286–305, 2015.
  15. [15] V. V. Romanuke, “Boosting ensembles of heavy two-layer perceptrons for increasing classification accuracy in recognizing shifted-turned-scaled flat images with binary features,” Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2015.
  16. [16] V. V. Romanuke, “An attempt of finding an appropriate number of convolutional layers in CNNs based on benchmarks of heterogeneous datasets,” Electrical, Control and Communication Engineering, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2478/ecce-2018-000610.2478/ecce-2018-0006
  17. [17] N. Srivastava, G. E. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. R. Salakhutdinov, “Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 15, pp. 1929–1958, 2014.
  18. [18] V. V. Romanuke, “Appropriate number and allocation of ReLUs in convolutional neural networks,” Research Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, no. 1, pp. 69–78, 2017. https://doi.org/10.20535/1810-0546.2017.1.8815610.20535/1810-0546.2017.1.88156
  19. [19] Z. Liao and G. Carneiro, “A deep convolutional neural network module that promotes competition of multiple-size filters,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 71, pp. 94–105, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2017.05.02410.1016/j.patcog.2017.05.024
  20. [20] J. Mutch and D. G. Lowe, “Object class recognition and localization using sparse features with limited receptive fields,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-007-0118-010.1007/s11263-007-0118-0
Language: English
Page range: 157 - 163
Published on: Mar 12, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Vadim Romanuke, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.