Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Navigating moral and market realities: Sustainability strategies for ethical SMEs Cover

Navigating moral and market realities: Sustainability strategies for ethical SMEs

Open Access
|Jun 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Proposed conceptual frameworkSource: own research

Figure 2:

Results of the modelSource: Data processing from PLS-SEM

Respondents' Profile

Demographic CharacteristicGreater Accra (n=250)Western Region (n=165)Total (N=415)
Gender
Male140 (56%)90 (55%)230 (55%)
Female110 (44%)75 (45%)185 (45%)
Age Group
18–30 years75 (30%)40 (24%)115 (28%)
31–45 years125 (50%)85 (52%)210 (51%)
46+ years50 (20%)40 (24%)90 (22%)
Education Level
Masters15 (6%)20 (12%)35 (8%)
SSSCE/Diploma120 (48%)90 (55%)210 (51%)
Degree115 (46%)55 (33%)170 (41%)

discriminant validity-Fornell Lacker

ConstructsCognitive AbilityCompetitive AdvantageOrganizational SlackStakeholder PressureSustainable Strategies
Cognitive Ability0.877
Competitive Advantage0.7710.853
Organizational Slack0.5410.5540.926
Stakeholder Pressure0.6040.6420.4520.856
Sustainable Strategies0.6930.7230.6920.5550.888

Construct Measurement, VIF and factor loadings

ConstructIndicatorFactor LoadingVIF
Cognitive AbilityCA2: My business leadership effectively anticipates market changes and adjusts strategies proactively.0.8101.478
CA3: I consistently evaluate risks and opportunities using logical reasoning before making key decisions.0.9152.255
CA4: Our team learns quickly from setbacks and innovates solutions to complex operational challenges.0.9022.135

Competitive AdvantageCOA2: Our SME offers unique products/services that stand out from competitors in the market.0.7791.703
COA3: We maintain lower operational costs than rivals, allowing competitive pricing without sacrificing quality.0.8932.622
COA4: Customer loyalty to our business provides a strong edge over other firms in our industry.0.8822.484

Organisational SlackOS1: Our business maintains excess financial resources to handle unexpected challenges or opportunities.0.8822.423
OS2: We have unused capacity in staff, equipment, or inventory that allows quick adaptation to market demands.0.9584.113
OS3: Extra operational buffers enable us to experiment with new sustainability initiatives without risking core stability.0.9364.118

Stakeholder PressureSP2: Customers increasingly demand sustainable practices from our business, influencing our operational choices0.7281.444
SP3: Regulatory bodies or government policies push our SME to adopt environmentally friendly strategies0.9262.922
SP4: Investors or partners expect us to prioritise ethical and green initiatives to maintain their support0.9002.540

Sustainable StrategiesSS2: Our SME actively incorporates eco-friendly materials and processes into core production or operations.0.8562.067
SS3: We pursue innovative green practices (e.g., energy efficiency or waste reduction) to gain a competitive edge.0.9233.074
SS4: Sustainability goals are embedded in our long-term business planning and resource allocation.0.8832.282

Hypothesis Testing

Standard Bootstrap Results
EffectsOriginal coefficientMean valueStandard Deviationt-valuep-valueInterpretation
H1: Stakeholder Pressure -> Cognitive Ability0.1860.1850.0652.8440.004Accepted
H2: Competitive Advantage -> Cognitive Ability0.6520.6520.05312.4040.000Accepted
H3: Cognitive Ability -> Sustainable Strategies0.4020.3940.0785.1840.000Accepted
H4: Organisational Slack -> Cognitive Ability -> Sustainable Strategies−0.076−0.1070.0651.1730.241Not Accepted

Determination R2

ConstructR-squareR-square adjusted
Cognitive Ability0.6150.612
Sustainable Strategies0.6360.633

Construct reliability and validity

ConstructsCronbach alphaComposite reliability (rho_a)Composite reliability (rho_c)Average Var. extracted (AVE)
Cognitive Ability0.8500.8670.9090.769
Competitive Advantage0.8110.8210.8880.727
Organizational Slack0.9160.9190.9470.858
Stakeholder Pressure0.8140.8520.8900.732
Sustainable Strategies0.8650.8670.9180.788
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2026-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2453-7829 | Journal ISSN: 1338-5615
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 47
Published on: Jun 10, 2026
Published by: University of Prešov
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 John Amoah, Sulemana Bankuoru Egala, George Ewur, Emmanuel Bruce, Appiah Sarpong, published by University of Prešov
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.