Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Barriers to Effective Breast Cancer Screening Programs: A Scoping Review Cover

Barriers to Effective Breast Cancer Screening Programs: A Scoping Review

Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

PRISMA flow chart

Key barriers to breast cancer screening reported across included studies

Barrier domainKey barriers (representative examples)
Patient-level barriersFear of pain during mammography; fear of cancer diagnosis or treatment; low perceived personal risk; absence of symptoms; anxiety related to radiation exposure; previous negative screening experiences; competing life priorities (work, caregiving, illness).
Socioeconomic and cultural barriersLow income; lack of health insurance or underinsurance; indirect costs (transport, time off work); low educational attainment; limited health literacy; social deprivation; financial insecurity despite availability of free screening.
Access-related barriersLong distance to screening facilities; transportation difficulties; inconvenient appointment times; limited service availability; long waiting times; poor physical accessibility for women with disabilities; urban–rural disparities in service provision.
Health system / organizational barriersFailure or delay in invitation letters; inaccurate population registries; lack of reminder or recall systems; fragmented care pathways; non-personalized screening processes; insufficient screening capacity; long screening intervals; administrative complexity.
Provider-related barriersAbsence of physician recommendation; inadequate communication about screening benefits and procedures; limited counseling time; inconsistent or unclear screening guidance; lack of cultural competence; language barriers during clinical encounters.

Distribution of reported barriers to breast cancer screening across included studies (n = 103)

Barrier domainStudies reporting barrier, n (%)
Patient-level barriers78 (75.7%)
Access-related barriers63 (61.2%)
Health system / organizational barriers59 (57.3%)
Socioeconomic and cultural barriers43 (41.7%)
Provider-related barriers33 (32.0%)

Characteristics of included studies (n = 103)

Characteristicn (%)
Publication period
2000–200936 (35.0%)
2010–201946 (44.7%)
≥202021 (20.4%)
Geographic region
Europe45 (43.7%)
North America35 (34.0%)
Asia-Pacific21 (20.4%)
Africa0 (0.0%)
Latin America1 (1.0%)
Multinational1 (1.0%)
Study design
Quantitative71 (68.9%)
Qualitative21 (20.4%)
Mixed-methods11 (10.7%)
Screening context
Organized50 (48.5%)
Opportunistic23 (22.3%)
Mixed / unclear30 (29.1%)
Target population (primary focus)
General population80 (77.7%)
Low socieconomic status3 (2.9%)
Migrant / ethnic minorities14 (13.6%)
Rural / remote2 (1.9%)
Other4 (3.9%)

Eligibility criteria for study selection_

DomainInclusion criteriaExclusion criteria
Study designOriginal quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods studiesReviews, meta-analyses, editorials, commentaries, conference abstracts, case reports
PopulationWomen eligible for or invited to mammography-based breast cancer screening in the general population or specific subgroupsStudies focused exclusively on high-risk genetic surveillance populations or symptomatic/diagnostic populations
Screening focusStudies examining barriers, determinants, or facilitators related to participation in or effectiveness of mammography-based screening programmesStudies focused exclusively on diagnostic mammography, imaging accuracy, or technical performance without behavioural, programmatic, or access-related context
Barriers / determinants of interestIndividual, socio-cultural, economic, health-system, provider-related, geographic, or informational barriers affecting screening uptake or effectivenessStudies not addressing factors associated with screening participation, non-participation, or programme effectiveness
Geographic contextStudies from all geographic regions and income settings were eligibleNo exclusions based solely on geographic region; however, studies outside the scope of organised or programme-based mammography screening were excluded
Publication characteristicsPeer-reviewed full-text articles published in English from 2000 onwardNon-English publications, unavailable/incomplete full-text articles, and studies published before 2000
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eabr-2026-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2956-2090 | Journal ISSN: 2956-0454
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 28, 2026
Accepted on: Mar 28, 2026
Published on: May 15, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Neda Milosavljevic, Marko Spasic, Ivana Ivanovic, Marija Zivkovic Radojevic, Bojan Stojanovic, Olivera Kostic, Petar Canovic, Milos Grujic, published by University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Medical Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT