Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Phenomenological Perspectives in Dialectical Leadership: Influence of Aesthetic Experiences on Managing Organisational Complexity and Paradoxes Cover

Phenomenological Perspectives in Dialectical Leadership: Influence of Aesthetic Experiences on Managing Organisational Complexity and Paradoxes

By: Michał Szostak  
Open Access
|Dec 2024

References

  1. Anderson, P. (1999). Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216—232. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.10.3.216.
  2. Aristotle (2014). Nicomachean Ethics (R. Crisp (Ed.)). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139600514.
  3. Ashworth, P. (2003). The Phenomenology of the Lifeworld and Social Psychology. Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 18—34.
  4. Barry, D., & Meisiek, S. (2010). Seeing More and Seeing Differently: Sensemaking, Mindfulness, and the Workarts. Organization Studies, 31(11), 1505—1530. DOI: 10.1177/0170840610380802.
  5. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  6. Beech, N., Burns, H., de Caestecker, L., MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. (2004). Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations, 57(10), 1313—1332. DOI: 10.1177/0018726704048357.
  7. Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A Dialectical View. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 1—21. DOI: 10.2307/2391741.
  8. Bitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 57—71. DOI: 10.1177/002224299205600205.
  9. Blesser, B., & Salter, L. R. (2007). Spaces Speak, Are You Listening?: Experiencing Aural Architecture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  10. Clegg, Stewart R., da Cunha, J. V., & e Cunha, M. P. (2002). Management Paradoxes: A Relational View. Human Relations, 55(5), 483—503. DOI: 10.1177/0018726702555001.
  11. Cooper, R., Boyko, C., & Codinhoto, R. (2009). The effect of the physical environment on mental capital and wellbeing. In C. L. Cooper, J. Field, U. Goswami, R. Jenkins, & B. J. Sahakian (Eds.), Mental capital and wellbeing (pp. 967—1006). Wiley-Blackwell.
  12. Cunha, M. P. e, & Putnam, L. L. (2019). Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organization, 17(1), 95—106. DOI: 10.1177/1476127017739536.
  13. Cunliffe, A. L. (2009). A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Management. Sage Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.4135/9781446280317.
  14. Cunliffe, A. L., & Eriksen, M. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64(11), 1425—1449. DOI: 10.1177/0018726711418388.
  15. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.
  16. Dreyfus, H. L. (1996). The current relevance of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment. The Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 4. Retrieved from https://ejap.louisiana.edu/EJAP/1996.spring/dreyfus.1996.spring.html.
  17. Dul, J., & Ceylan, C. (2011). Work environments for employee creativity. Ergonomics, 54(1), 12—20. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2010.542833.
  18. Elsbach, K. D., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). The Physical Environment in Organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 181—224. DOI: 10.1080/078559809.
  19. Fairhurst, G. T. (2001). Dualisms in leadership research. In F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), New Handbook Of Organizational Communication: Advances In Theory, Research, And Methods (pp. 379—439). SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781412986243.
  20. Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. L. (2019). An Integrative Methodology for Organizational Oppositions: Aligning Grounded Theory and Discourse Analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 22(4), 917—940. DOI: 10.1177/1094428118776771.
  21. Gagliardi, P. (2006). Organisational culture and symbols. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organisation studies (pp. 1028—1045). London: Sage Publications.
  22. Gagliardi, P. (Ed.) (1990). Symbols and Artifacts. De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110874143.
  23. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.
  24. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  25. Gołaszewska, M. (1984). Estetyka i antyestetyka. Kraków: Wiedza Powszechna.
  26. Gosling, J., & Mintzberg, H. (2004). The Education of Practicing Managers. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 26—32.
  27. Grint, K. (2001). The Arts of Leadership. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244898.001.0001.
  28. Hansen, H., Ropo, A., & Sauer, E. (2007). Aesthetic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 544—560. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.09.003.
  29. Hargreaves, D. J. (2012). Musical imagination: Perception and production, beauty and creativity. Psychology of Music, 40(5), 539—557. DOI: 10.1177/0305735612444893.
  30. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being in Time. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  31. Herz, R. (2016). The Role of Odor-Evoked Memory in Psychological and Physiological Health. Brain Sciences, 6(3), 22. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci6030022.
  32. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  33. Ingarden, R. (1981). Wykłady i dyskusje z estetyki. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  34. Koivunen, N., & Wennes, G. (2011). Show us the sound! Aesthetic leadership of symphony orchestra conductors. Leadership, 7(1), 51—71. DOI: 10.1177/1742715010386865.
  35. Küpers, W. M. (2013). Embodied inter-practices of leadership — Phenomenological perspectives on relational and responsive leading and following. Leadership, 9(3), 335—357. DOI: 10.1177/1742715013485852.
  36. Küpers, W. M. (2005). Phenomenology of embodied implicit and narrative knowing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(6), 114—133. DOI: 10.1108/13673270510630006.
  37. Ladkin, D. (2008). Leading beautifully: How mastery, congruence and purpose create the aesthetic of embodied leadership practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 31—41. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.003.
  38. Ladkin, D. (2010). Rethinking leadership: A new look at old leadership questions. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  39. Ladkin, D., & Taylor, S. S. (2010). Enacting the ‘true self’: Towards a theory of embodied authentic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 64—74. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.005.
  40. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. L. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
  41. Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489—508. DOI: 10.1348/0007126042369811.
  42. Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760—776. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2000.3707712.
  43. Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a Metatheoretical Perspective: Sharpening the Focus and Widening the Scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127—149. DOI: 10.1177/0021886314522322.
  44. Liu, S. Q., Bogicevic, V., & Mattila, A. S. (2018). Circular vs. angular servicescape: “Shaping” customer response to a fast service encounter pace. Journal of Business Research, 89, 47—56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.007.
  45. Malnar, J. M., & Vodvarka, F. (2004). Sensory design. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  46. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
  47. Minahan, S. (2020). Aesthetic Turn in Management. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351147965.
  48. Mintzberg, H., & Westley, F. (2001). Decision making: it’s not what you think. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(3), 89—93. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/decision-making-its-not-what-you-think/.
  49. Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The “Need for Touch” Scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430—442. DOI: 10.1086/378619.
  50. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., & Spence, C. (Eds.) (2016). Multisensory Flavor Perception. Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/C2014-0-03761-6.
  51. Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
  52. Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65—171. DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421.
  53. Riisberg, V., Mads, &, & Folkmann, N. (2015). Exploring the Aesthetics of Sustainable Fashion. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/80935931/Exploring_the_Aesthetics_of_Sustainable_Fashion.
  54. Ropo, A., & Parviainen, J. (2001). Leadership and bodily knowledge in expert organizations: epistemological rethinking. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17(1), 1—18. DOI: 10.1016/S0956-5221(00)00030-0.
  55. Ropo, A., Sauer, E., & Salovaara, P. (2013). Embodiment of leadership through material place. Leadership, 9(3), 378—395. DOI: 10.1177/1742715013485858.
  56. Sadler-Smith, E. (2008). The Role of Intuition in Collective Learning and the Development of Shared Meaning. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 494—508. DOI: 10.1177/1523422308320065.
  57. Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2011). Grasping the Logic of Practice: Theorizing Through Practical Rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338— 360. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2009.0183.
  58. Schroeder, J. E. (2002). Visual Consumption. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203471630.
  59. Schroeder, J. E., & Zwick, D. (2004). Mirrors of Masculinity: Representation and Identity in Advertising Images. Consumption Markets & Culture, 7(1), 21—52. DOI: 10.1080/1025386042000212383.
  60. Schumpeter, J. A. (1949). Theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. In Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  61. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381— 403. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2009.0223.
  62. Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522—536. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0134.
  63. Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68—76. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making.
  64. Strati, A. (2009). Do you do beautiful things? Aesthetics and art in qualitative methods of organization studies. In The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (Issue September, pp. 230—245). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1309.3849.
  65. Strati, A. (1999). Organization and Aesthetics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd. Retrieved from https://sk.sagepub.com/books/organization-and-aesthetics.
  66. Strati, A., & DeMontoux, P. G. (2002). Introduction: Organizing aesthetics. Human Relations, 55(7), 755—766. DOI: 10.1177/0018726702557001.
  67. Szostak, M. (2023). Sztuka zarządzania — zarządzanie sztuką. Łódź—Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Społecznej Akademii Nauk.
  68. Szostak, M. (2024). Humanistic Management, Organisation and Aesthetics: Art of Management and Management of Art. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003458029.
  69. Szostak, M. (2025). The aesthetical perspective of post-Schumpeterian innovations. In J. Chen, & R. Lenart-Gansiniec (Eds.), Handbook on Post-Schumpeterian Innovations. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  70. Szostak, M., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2020). Manager as an artist: Creative endeavour in crossing the borders of art and organizational discourse. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 351—368. DOI: 10.3846/cs.2020.11373.
  71. Taylor, S. S. (2023). New Horizons for Organizational Aesthetics. Organizational Aesthetics, 12(1), 1—3. Retrieved from https://oa.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/index.php/oa/article/view/275.
  72. Taylor, S. S., & Ladkin, D. (2009). Understanding arts-based methods in managerial development. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 55—69. DOI: 10.5465/AMLE.2009.37012179.
  73. Uhl-Bien, M., & Marion, R. (2009). Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: A meso model. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 631—650. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.007.
  74. Van Manen, M. (2016). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. London: Routledge.
  75. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  76. Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business Press.
  77. Vince, R., & Broussine, M. (1996). Paradox, Defense and Attachment: Accessing and Working with Emotions and Relations Underlying Organizational Change. Organization Studies, 17(1), 1—21. DOI: 10.1177/017084069601700101.
  78. Weiss, H., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Organizational Behavior, 18, 1—74. Retrieved from https://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Affect/AffectiveEventsTheory_WeissCropanzano.pdf.
  79. Zahavi, D. (2019). Phenomenology: The Basics. London: Routledge.
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 76
Submitted on: Aug 31, 2024
Accepted on: Oct 7, 2024
Published on: Dec 20, 2024
Published by: SAN University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Michał Szostak, published by SAN University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.