Leadership and Humor, the Moomin Way

Tienari, Janne; Savage, Paul

doi:10.2478/doc-2024-0008

Abstract

Drawing on an ethnographic study in the Moomin business we explore how a discourse on humor enables organizational members to enact a particular form of leadership. While the Moomin heritage and philosophy steers leadership towards supporting and caring for people and respecting their differences, the relational and contextual nature of organizational interactions renders leadership and humor subject to friction and tensions. We elucidate how humor plays out between leaders, in meetings, in supporting people, and in parties, and how humor is constantly on the edge. Our study contributes to understanding leadership as discursive practice steered by humor.

References

Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (3rd ed). London: Sage.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2003). Managers doing leadership: The extra--ordinarization of the mundane. Human Relations, 56(12), 1435—1459.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bunea, E. (2022). Can Humor Make You a Better Leader? Lessons from managers who dabble in comedy. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/to-manage-is-human/202211/can-humor-make-you-a-better-leader. Accessed 11 March 2024.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Constantino, A. K. (2022). These Stanford experts say humor is the key to great leadership: ‘We can do serious things without taking ourselves too seriously’. CNBC Digital. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/14/stanford-experts-workplace-humor-is-the-secret-to-great-leadership.html. Accessed 11 March 2024.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cooper, C. D., Kong, D. T., & Crossley, C. D. (2018). Leader humor as an interpersonal resource: integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 769—796. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2014.0358.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Crevani, L., Lindgren, M. & Packendorff, J. (2010). Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 77—86. DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2009.12.003.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Einola K., & Alvesson, M. (2019). The making and unmaking of teams. Human Relations, 72(2), 1891—1919. DOI: 10.1177/0018726718812130.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fairhurst, G. T. (2008). Discursive Leadership: A communication alternative to leadership psychology. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 510—521. DOI: 10.1177/0893318907313714.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fairhurst, G. T., & Connaughton, S. L. (2014). Leadership: A communicative perspective. Leadership, 10(1), 7—35. DOI: 10.1177/1742715013509396.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fairhurst, G. T., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2012). Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1043—1062. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fineman, S., Gabriel, Y., & Sims, D. (2000). Organizing and organizations. London: Sage.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003). Working at a cynical distance: Implications for power, subjectivity and resistance. Organization, 10(1), 157—179. DOI: 10.1177/135050840301000137.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ford, J. (2006). Discourses of leadership: Gender, identity and contradiction in a UK public sector organization. Leadership, 2(1), 77—99. DOI: 10.1177/1742715006060654.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gkorezis, P., & Bellou, V. (2016). The relationship between leader self--deprecating humor and perceived effectiveness: Trust in leader as a mediator. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(7), 882—898. DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-11-2014-0231.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hansen, H., Elias, S. R. S. T. A., Stevenson, A., Smith, A. D., Alexander, B. N., & Barros, M. (2023). Resisting the objectification of qualitative research: The unsilencing of context, researchers, and noninterview data. Organizational Research Methods, forthcoming. DOI: 10.1177/10944281231215119.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hatch, M. J., & Ehrlich, S. B. (1993). Spontaneous humour as an indicator of paradox and ambiguity in organizations. Organization Studies, 14(4), 505—526. DOI: 10.1177/017084069301400403.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Huang, M. J. (2022). Leader self -deprecating humor and employee creativity at workplace: a longitudinal study. Review of Managerial Science, 17(2), 467—492. DOI:10.1007/s11846-022-00532-w.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jansson, T. (2018). Tales from Moominvalley. London: Penguin. (Originally published in 1964.)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jarzabkowski, P. A., & Le, J. K. (2017). We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 433—462. DOI: 10.1177/0170840616640846.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koivunen, N. (2007). The processual nature of leadership discourses. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(3), 284—305. DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2007.05.006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Laajarinne, J. (2009). Muumit ja olemisen arvoitus. Jyväskylä: Atena. [Moomins and the mystery of being.]
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martin, D. M. (2004). Humor in middle management: Women negotiating the paradoxes of organizational life. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 147—170. DOI: 10.1080/0090988042000210034.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2022). The Moomin family: An elastic permeable multi -dimensional construct in semiotic and social space. In A. J. Moya--Guijarro, & E. Ventola (Eds.), A multimodal approach to challenging gender stereotypes in children’s picture books. New York: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ospina, S. M., Foldy, E. G., Fairhurst, G. T., & Jackson, B. (2020). Collective dimensions of leadership: Connecting theory and method. Human Relations, 70(4), 441—463. DOI: 10.1177/0018726719899714.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Plesner, U. (2015). “Take it like a man!”: Performing hegemonic masculinity through organizational humour. Ephemera, 15(3), 537—559.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316534984.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robinson, S., & Kerr, R. (2015). Reflexive conversations: constructing hermeneutic designs for qualitative management research. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 777—790. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12118.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rodriques, S. S. B., & Collinson, D. L. (1995). Having fun? Workplace resistance and humour in Brazil. Organization Studies, 16(5), 739—768. DOI: 10.1177/017084069501600501.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Romero, E. J., & Cruthirds, K. W. (2006). The use of humor in the workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 58—69. DOI: 10.5465/AMP.2006.20591005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Savage, P., & Tienari, J. (2024). Moomin management: Redefining generosity. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Westin, B. (2014). Tove Jansson: Life, art, words: The authorised biography. London: Sort of Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Westwood, R., & Johnston, A. (2012). Reclaiming authentic selves: Control, resistive humour and identity work in the office. Organization, 19(6), 787—808. DOI: 10.1177/1350508411422583.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Leadership and Humor, the Moomin Way

Abstract

Paradigm

My account