References
- Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (3rd ed). London: Sage.
- Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2003). Managers doing leadership: The extra--ordinarization of the mundane. Human Relations, 56(12), 1435—1459.
- Bunea, E. (2022). Can Humor Make You a Better Leader? Lessons from managers who dabble in comedy. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/to-manage-is-human/202211/can-humor-make-you-a-better-leader. Accessed 11 March 2024.
- Constantino, A. K. (2022). These Stanford experts say humor is the key to great leadership: ‘We can do serious things without taking ourselves too seriously’. CNBC Digital. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/14/stanford-experts-workplace-humor-is-the-secret-to-great-leadership.html. Accessed 11 March 2024.
- Cooper, C. D., Kong, D. T., & Crossley, C. D. (2018). Leader humor as an interpersonal resource: integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 769—796. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2014.0358.
- Crevani, L., Lindgren, M. & Packendorff, J. (2010). Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 77—86. DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2009.12.003.
- Einola K., & Alvesson, M. (2019). The making and unmaking of teams. Human Relations, 72(2), 1891—1919. DOI: 10.1177/0018726718812130.
- Fairhurst, G. T. (2008). Discursive Leadership: A communication alternative to leadership psychology. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 510—521. DOI: 10.1177/0893318907313714.
- Fairhurst, G. T., & Connaughton, S. L. (2014). Leadership: A communicative perspective. Leadership, 10(1), 7—35. DOI: 10.1177/1742715013509396.
- Fairhurst, G. T., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2012). Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1043—1062. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.005.
- Fineman, S., Gabriel, Y., & Sims, D. (2000). Organizing and organizations. London: Sage.
- Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003). Working at a cynical distance: Implications for power, subjectivity and resistance. Organization, 10(1), 157—179. DOI: 10.1177/135050840301000137.
- Ford, J. (2006). Discourses of leadership: Gender, identity and contradiction in a UK public sector organization. Leadership, 2(1), 77—99. DOI: 10.1177/1742715006060654.
- Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
- Gkorezis, P., & Bellou, V. (2016). The relationship between leader self--deprecating humor and perceived effectiveness: Trust in leader as a mediator. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(7), 882—898. DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-11-2014-0231.
- Hansen, H., Elias, S. R. S. T. A., Stevenson, A., Smith, A. D., Alexander, B. N., & Barros, M. (2023). Resisting the objectification of qualitative research: The unsilencing of context, researchers, and noninterview data. Organizational Research Methods, forthcoming. DOI: 10.1177/10944281231215119.
- Hatch, M. J., & Ehrlich, S. B. (1993). Spontaneous humour as an indicator of paradox and ambiguity in organizations. Organization Studies, 14(4), 505—526. DOI: 10.1177/017084069301400403.
- Huang, M. J. (2022). Leader self -deprecating humor and employee creativity at workplace: a longitudinal study. Review of Managerial Science, 17(2), 467—492. DOI:10.1007/s11846-022-00532-w.
- Jansson, T. (2018). Tales from Moominvalley. London: Penguin. (Originally published in 1964.)
- Jarzabkowski, P. A., & Le, J. K. (2017). We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 433—462. DOI: 10.1177/0170840616640846.
- Koivunen, N. (2007). The processual nature of leadership discourses. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(3), 284—305. DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2007.05.006.
- Laajarinne, J. (2009). Muumit ja olemisen arvoitus. Jyväskylä: Atena. [Moomins and the mystery of being.]
- Martin, D. M. (2004). Humor in middle management: Women negotiating the paradoxes of organizational life. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 147—170. DOI: 10.1080/0090988042000210034.
- Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2022). The Moomin family: An elastic permeable multi -dimensional construct in semiotic and social space. In A. J. Moya--Guijarro, & E. Ventola (Eds.), A multimodal approach to challenging gender stereotypes in children’s picture books. New York: Routledge.
- Ospina, S. M., Foldy, E. G., Fairhurst, G. T., & Jackson, B. (2020). Collective dimensions of leadership: Connecting theory and method. Human Relations, 70(4), 441—463. DOI: 10.1177/0018726719899714.
- Plesner, U. (2015). “Take it like a man!”: Performing hegemonic masculinity through organizational humour. Ephemera, 15(3), 537—559.
- Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316534984.
- Robinson, S., & Kerr, R. (2015). Reflexive conversations: constructing hermeneutic designs for qualitative management research. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 777—790. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12118.
- Rodriques, S. S. B., & Collinson, D. L. (1995). Having fun? Workplace resistance and humour in Brazil. Organization Studies, 16(5), 739—768. DOI: 10.1177/017084069501600501.
- Romero, E. J., & Cruthirds, K. W. (2006). The use of humor in the workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 58—69. DOI: 10.5465/AMP.2006.20591005.
- Savage, P., & Tienari, J. (2024). Moomin management: Redefining generosity. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press.
- Westin, B. (2014). Tove Jansson: Life, art, words: The authorised biography. London: Sort of Books.
- Westwood, R., & Johnston, A. (2012). Reclaiming authentic selves: Control, resistive humour and identity work in the office. Organization, 19(6), 787—808. DOI: 10.1177/1350508411422583.